PAE Government Services awarded $197.7M for overseas facilities support, highlighting long-term service delivery

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $197,684,441 ($197.7M)

Contractor: PAE Government Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2010-06-16

End Date: 2014-12-31

Contract Duration: 1,659 days

Daily Burn Rate: $119.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: OVERSEAS CONTRACT

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $197.7 million to PAE GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. for work described as: OVERSEAS CONTRACT Key points: 1. Contract value represents significant investment in maintaining overseas operational capabilities. 2. Full and open competition suggests a robust market for these specialized services. 3. Long contract duration (over 4 years) indicates a need for sustained, reliable support. 4. Facilities support services are critical for government operations in challenging environments. 5. The award to a single contractor implies successful bid against multiple potential competitors. 6. Performance period spans multiple fiscal years, requiring consistent budget allocation and oversight.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $197.7 million over approximately 4.5 years for overseas facilities support appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale, long-term overseas support contracts is challenging due to unique operational environments and specific service requirements. However, the full and open competition suggests that pricing was likely scrutinized against market rates. The absence of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes a definitive value-for-money assessment difficult, but the sustained award implies satisfactory performance.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of two bids suggests a competitive environment, though the exact number of potential bidders is unknown. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive bidding process which typically drives down costs and ensures the government receives services at a fair market price.

Public Impact

US Department of State personnel and operations at overseas locations are directly supported. Ensures continuity of government functions and diplomatic missions abroad. Supports the physical infrastructure and operational readiness of US facilities overseas. Indirectly supports local workforces at overseas installations through contractor employment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns in long-term, complex overseas operations.
Geopolitical instability in operating regions could impact service delivery and costs.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical infrastructure may pose risks if performance falters.

Positive Signals

Successful award through full and open competition indicates contractor capability.
Long-term nature of the contract suggests a stable, ongoing requirement met.
The scale of the award implies significant operational experience and capacity.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) is a broad category encompassing a wide range of services essential for the operation and maintenance of buildings and grounds. This contract falls within a sector critical for government operations, particularly in overseas environments where self-sufficiency and robust infrastructure management are paramount. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish precisely due to the unique nature of overseas operations, but large-scale facilities management contracts can run into hundreds of millions of dollars annually.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). There is no information regarding subcontracting plans or performance. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal, unless the prime contractor engages small businesses for specific support roles not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of State. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and payment schedules tied to successful delivery. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed operational oversight specifics are often internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if performance issues or allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.

Related Government Programs

Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) funding
Base Operations Support (BOS)
Department of Defense Facilities Management Contracts
Embassy Security and Maintenance Contracts

Risk Flags

Long-term contract duration
Overseas operational environment
Potential for geopolitical risks
Reliance on single contractor for critical services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $197.7 million to PAE GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.. OVERSEAS CONTRACT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PAE GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $197.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-06-16. End: 2014-12-31.

What is the track record of PAE Government Services, Inc. in fulfilling similar overseas facilities support contracts?

PAE Government Services, Inc. has a substantial history of performing large-scale government contracts, particularly in logistics, technical services, and facilities management, often in complex overseas environments. Their experience includes providing base operations support, maintenance, and security services for military and diplomatic installations. While specific performance details for this particular $197.7 million contract (2010-2014) are not detailed in the provided data, PAE's general profile suggests they are a major player in this sector. Analyzing past performance reviews, contract modifications, and any reported disputes or awards associated with their other similar contracts would provide a more comprehensive picture of their reliability and effectiveness in delivering these critical services.

How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated value or initial budget for these overseas facilities support services?

The provided data indicates the awarded amount is $197,684,440.72. Without access to the initial budget, estimated value, or the specific details of the solicitation, it is impossible to definitively compare the awarded amount to the government's initial financial planning for this contract. However, the fact that it was awarded under full and open competition with two bids suggests that the final negotiated price was competitive. If the awarded amount was significantly lower than initial estimates, it would indicate successful cost management during the bidding process. Conversely, if it was higher, it might suggest unforeseen requirements or market conditions.

What are the primary risks associated with long-term facilities support contracts in overseas locations?

Long-term facilities support contracts in overseas locations carry several inherent risks. These include geopolitical instability in the host country, which can disrupt operations, increase security costs, and affect personnel safety. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates can impact costs if payments are made in local currency. Logistical challenges in remote or austere environments can lead to delays and increased expenses for supplies and personnel. Furthermore, the long duration increases the risk of scope creep, unexpected maintenance needs, and potential contractor performance degradation over time. Changes in government policy or mission requirements can also necessitate contract modifications, potentially leading to cost increases or schedule adjustments.

What specific facilities support services are included under this contract, and how are they measured for effectiveness?

The provided data classifies this contract under NAICS code 561210, Facilities Support Services. This typically encompasses a broad range of activities such as maintenance and repair of buildings and grounds, utilities management (power, water, waste), custodial services, pest control, transportation support, and potentially security services. The effectiveness of these services is usually measured through performance work statements (PWS) that outline specific deliverables, service levels, and quality standards. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) might include response times for maintenance requests, uptime percentages for critical systems, cleanliness standards, and overall customer satisfaction surveys from the government personnel utilizing the facilities. However, the specific PWS and KPIs for this contract are not detailed in the provided summary.

What has been the historical spending trend for similar overseas facilities support services by the Department of State?

Analyzing the historical spending trend for similar overseas facilities support services by the Department of State requires access to multi-year budget and contract data. This specific contract, awarded in 2010 and ending in 2014, represents a significant expenditure of approximately $40 million per year. To understand the broader trend, one would need to examine spending patterns before and after this period, looking at the total outlays for facilities management, base operations, and related support services across various overseas posts. Factors such as diplomatic expansion, security enhancements, and global events would influence these trends. Without broader data, it's difficult to ascertain if this $197.7 million award was part of a consistent spending pattern, an increase, or a decrease in the Department's investment in such services.

Were there any significant contract modifications or change orders issued during the performance period of this contract?

The provided data summary does not include information on contract modifications or change orders issued during the performance period of this contract (June 16, 2010, to December 31, 2014). Significant modifications could indicate changes in scope, unforeseen issues, or adjustments to pricing. A review of the contract's official modification history, typically available through federal procurement databases like FPDS-NG (Federal Procurement Data System - Next Generation) or SAM.gov, would be necessary to determine if any substantial changes occurred. Such modifications can impact the total contract value and duration, and provide insights into the evolving needs or challenges faced during its execution.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Amentum Government Services Holdings LLC (UEI: 081342873)

Address: 888 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET,, LOS ANGELES, CA, 90017

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $197,735,755

Exercised Options: $197,735,755

Current Obligation: $197,684,441

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: SLMAQM04C0033

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline