State Department's $17.2M criminal justice program awarded to PAE Government Services, Inc. for facilities support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,244,348 ($17.2M)

Contractor: PAE Government Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2008-09-09

End Date: 2012-01-15

Contract Duration: 1,223 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.1K/day

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: COMPREHENSIVE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $17.2 million to PAE GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. for work described as: COMPREHENSIVE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a multi-year facilities support program. 2. Limited competition may have impacted price discovery. 3. Contract duration and firm fixed price structure suggest moderate risk. 4. Performance context is a multi-year criminal justice sector development program. 5. Sector positioning is within government facilities support services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $17.2 million over roughly four years for facilities support services appears to be within a reasonable range for a program of this nature. Benchmarking against similar multi-year facilities support contracts for government agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price contract type suggests that the contractor bears the primary risk for cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator for the government if managed effectively.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The competition level for this contract is noted as 'limited,' with 3 bidders. While not a sole-source award, limited competition can sometimes lead to less competitive pricing compared to full and open solicitations. The specific reasons for the limited competition are not detailed, but it suggests that fewer than expected vendors were able to or chose to bid on this requirement.

Taxpayer Impact: Limited competition may mean taxpayers did not benefit from the lowest possible price achievable through a broader bidding process.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Department of State and its criminal justice sector development initiatives. Services delivered include facilities support, crucial for the operational continuity of program activities. Geographic impact is likely concentrated where the criminal justice sector development program operates. Workforce implications may include on-site support staff managed by PAE Government Services, Inc.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost inefficiencies due to limited competition.
Risk of service quality degradation if contractor performance is not closely monitored.
Dependency on a single contractor for critical facilities support.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
Multi-year award provides stability for program operations.
PAE Government Services, Inc. is an established government contractor.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing maintenance, repair, and operational support for government and commercial buildings. The market for these services is substantial, with significant government spending allocated annually. This specific contract supports a criminal justice sector development program, indicating a specialized application of facilities management within a sensitive area.

Small Business Impact

Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans is not explicitly provided in the data. Without this information, it is difficult to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem. Typically, larger contracts may include provisions for small business participation, but this cannot be confirmed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight mechanisms would typically involve the Department of State's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics may not always be publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Criminal Justice Programs
International Development Assistance
Facilities Management Services
Department of State Operations Support

Risk Flags

Limited competition may impact price.
Contract duration requires sustained oversight.
Scope of services for criminal justice sector development is critical.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $17.2 million to PAE GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.. COMPREHENSIVE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PAE GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-09-09. End: 2012-01-15.

What is the track record of PAE Government Services, Inc. in delivering similar facilities support services to government agencies?

PAE Government Services, Inc. has a long history of providing a wide range of support services to government agencies, including facilities management, logistics, and technical support. Their experience spans numerous complex environments and mission-critical operations. While specific performance data for this particular contract is not detailed here, PAE's general track record suggests they possess the capabilities to manage large-scale facilities support requirements. A deeper dive into past performance evaluations and any reported issues on similar contracts would provide a more granular assessment of their reliability and effectiveness in this domain.

How does the awarded value compare to industry benchmarks for similar facilities support contracts?

The awarded value of approximately $17.2 million over a period of roughly four years for facilities support services needs to be benchmarked against comparable contracts to definitively assess value for money. Factors such as the scope of services (e.g., maintenance, security, cleaning, utilities management), the geographic location of the facilities, and the specific requirements of the criminal justice sector development program would influence pricing. Without access to a database of similar government contracts with detailed cost breakdowns, a precise comparison is challenging. However, for a multi-year, comprehensive support program, this figure appears within a plausible range, assuming the scope of work is substantial.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential cost overruns (though mitigated by the firm fixed-price structure), contractor performance issues affecting program operations, and potential disruptions to service delivery. The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type inherently shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor, PAE Government Services, Inc. Mitigation strategies would typically involve robust performance monitoring by the Department of State, clear performance standards and metrics outlined in the contract, and contingency planning for service disruptions. The limited competition also presents a risk of less favorable pricing and potentially fewer innovative solutions.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by the Department of State in this sector?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for facilities support services by the Department of State, particularly within the context of international programs or criminal justice sector development, would provide valuable insights. This contract, awarded in 2008, represents a specific investment during that period. To understand broader trends, one would need to examine spending data across multiple fiscal years, looking at the total expenditure on facilities support, the number and value of contracts awarded, and the primary contractors involved. Such an analysis could reveal whether this $17.2 million award was an outlier, a consistent level of investment, or part of a growing or shrinking trend in this service category.

How effective has PAE Government Services, Inc. been in managing contracts with similar complexity and duration?

Assessing the effectiveness of PAE Government Services, Inc. in managing contracts of similar complexity and duration requires reviewing their performance history on past awards. This would involve examining contract performance reports, any documented disputes or claims, and overall client satisfaction feedback. Given PAE's extensive experience in government contracting, it is probable they have managed numerous multi-year, complex support service contracts. However, without specific data points related to this contract or directly comparable ones, a definitive statement on their effectiveness remains speculative. A review of contract databases and agency performance records would be necessary for a thorough evaluation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Amentum Government Services Holdings LLC (UEI: 081342873)

Address: 888 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET,, LOS ANGELES, CA, 90017

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,246,564

Exercised Options: $17,246,564

Current Obligation: $17,244,348

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: SLMAQM04C0033

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline