NASA Awards $163.8M for Systems and Software Assurance Services to Science Applications International Corporation
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $163,871,678 ($163.9M)
Contractor: Science Applications International Corporation
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2017-05-11
End Date: 2022-11-10
Contract Duration: 2,009 days
Daily Burn Rate: $81.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: IT
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE ASSURANCE SERVICES - THE PURPOSE OF THIS CONTRACT IS TO ACQUIRE SPECIALIZED SYSTEM AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT AS WELL AS SYSTEM AND SOFTWARE ASSURANCE SERVICES. THESE SERVICES ARE PERFORMED ON SELECTED SYSTEMS BEING DEVELOPED BY OR FOR NASA, OTHER FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, COMMERCIAL ENTITIES AND/OR OTHER ORGANIZATIONS AND INSTITUTIONS AS DIRECTED BY THE GOVERNMENT.
Place of Performance
Location: FAIRMONT, MARION County, WEST VIRGINIA, 26554
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $163.9 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE ASSURANCE SERVICES - THE PURPOSE OF THIS CONTRACT IS TO ACQUIRE SPECIALIZED SYSTEM AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT AS WELL AS SYSTEM AND SOFTWARE ASSURANCE SERVICES. THESE SERVICES ARE PERFORMED ON SELECTED SYSTEMS BEING DEVELOPED BY O… Key points: 1. Contract focuses on specialized system and software engineering, development, and assurance for NASA and other government agencies. 2. Services extend to commercial entities and other organizations, indicating broad applicability. 3. The contract value of $163.8M over its period suggests significant investment in critical software and system integrity. 4. Competition was full and open, indicating a robust bidding process.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $163.8M for engineering and software assurance services appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale government IT and engineering contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process that likely led to fair pricing. This method allows all eligible contractors to participate, fostering price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by promoting efficiency and potentially lower costs through market forces.
Public Impact
Ensures the integrity and security of critical systems developed for NASA and other government entities. Supports the development and assurance of software used across various federal agencies and potentially commercial sectors. Contributes to the reliability and safety of complex engineering projects. Provides specialized expertise that may not be readily available in-house.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep in complex engineering and development projects.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical assurance services.
- Ensuring continued relevance of services with evolving technology.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Services support multiple government agencies and potentially commercial entities.
- Significant contract value indicates a recognized need for these specialized services.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically focusing on systems and software assurance. Spending in this area is crucial for government agencies to maintain the integrity and security of their technological infrastructure, with benchmarks varying widely based on project complexity and duration.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that the prime contractor is Science Applications International Corporation, a large business. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this contract.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract is managed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), which has established oversight mechanisms for its procurements. The presence of an Inspector General (IG) within NASA suggests a level of accountability for contract performance and spending.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts.
- Risk of vendor lock-in if specialized knowledge is not transferred.
- Dependence on contractor's ability to keep pace with technological advancements.
- Ensuring consistent quality of assurance services across diverse projects.
Tags
engineering-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, wv, definitive-contract, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $163.9 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION. IGF::OT::IGF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE ASSURANCE SERVICES - THE PURPOSE OF THIS CONTRACT IS TO ACQUIRE SPECIALIZED SYSTEM AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT AS WELL AS SYSTEM AND SOFTWARE ASSURANCE SERVICES. THESE SERVICES ARE PERFORMED ON SELECTED SYSTEMS BEING DEVELOPED BY OR FOR NASA, OTHER FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, COMMERCIAL ENTITIES AND/OR OTHER ORGANIZATIONS AND INSTITUTIONS AS DIRECTED BY THE GOVERNMENT.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $163.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2017-05-11. End: 2022-11-10.
What specific metrics are used to evaluate the effectiveness of the system and software assurance services provided under this contract?
The effectiveness of system and software assurance services is typically evaluated through metrics such as defect detection rates, reduction in critical vulnerabilities, successful completion of security audits, and adherence to development and testing standards. NASA likely has specific performance work statements and key performance indicators (KPIs) that the contractor must meet, with regular reporting and reviews to assess progress and impact.
How does NASA ensure that the pricing for these specialized engineering and development services remains competitive and fair over the contract's duration?
NASA employs several strategies to ensure competitive and fair pricing. For contracts awarded under full and open competition, the initial pricing is established through a rigorous evaluation of proposals. For Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts, NASA monitors costs closely and may negotiate adjustments based on performance, market changes, and the contractor's efficiency. Regular audits and cost analyses are also employed to validate expenditures.
What is the potential long-term impact of these assurance services on the lifecycle cost and reliability of NASA's systems?
Effective system and software assurance services can significantly reduce long-term lifecycle costs by preventing costly defects, security breaches, and system failures early in the development process. By ensuring reliability and security from the outset, these services enhance the overall lifespan and operational effectiveness of NASA's systems, minimizing the need for expensive retrofits or emergency repairs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: NNG16544506R
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 12010 SUNSET HILLS RD, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $170,000,000
Exercised Options: $170,000,000
Current Obligation: $163,871,678
Actual Outlays: $104,099,394
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 104
Total Subaward Amount: $62,271,423
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2017-05-11
Current End Date: 2022-11-10
Potential End Date: 2022-11-10 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-08-13
More Contracts from Science Applications International Corporation
- Task Order to Provide Project Management Support, Transition Support, Engineering and Design Support, Securing the Infrastructure Support and O&M Support for the Department's IT Consolidation Program — $2.1B (Department of State)
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (General Services Administration)
- Unified Nasa Information Technology Services (unites) — $1.4B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (General Services Administration)
- This Effort IS for a Follow on Procurement Requirement. the Name of This Procurement IS the Omnibus Multidiscipline Engineering Services (omes) II. the Principal Purpose of This Contract IS to Provide Multidiscipline Engineering Support Services and Related Work to EED, Istd, SED, MSD, Mesa, Jpss, Ssco, and Related Organizations, AS Required, for the Study, Design, Systems Engineering, Development, Fabrication, Integration, Testing, Verification, and Operations of Space Flight, Airborne, and Ground System Hardware and Software, Including Development and Validation of NEW Technologies to Enable Future Space and Science Missions. to This END, the Contractor Shall Provide On/Off-Site Multidiscipline Engineering Services, Pursuant to Task Orders Issued by the Contracting Officer. These Services Shall Include the Personnel, Facilities, and Materials (unless Otherwise Provided by the Government) to Accomplish the Tasks. Travel MAY BE Required by the Contractor to Support Certain Task Orders, These Travel Requirements Will BE Identified on a Task by Task Basis — $1.0B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
View all Science Applications International Corporation federal contracts →
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →