NASA awards $20.8M to Leidos for PBRF environmental and safety support
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $20,834,885 ($20.8M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2007-12-04
End Date: 2013-09-30
Contract Duration: 2,127 days
Daily Burn Rate: $9.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: OTHER (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)
Sector: Other
Official Description: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY OFFICE SUPPORT (EMASS) TASK ORDER FOR THE TASK 400 SERIES - PLUM BROOK REACTOR FACILITY DECOMMISSIONING (PBRF) ENVIRONMENTAL AND SAFETY SUPPORT
Place of Performance
Location: CLEVELAND, CUYAHOGA County, OHIO, 44135
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $20.8 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY OFFICE SUPPORT (EMASS) TASK ORDER FOR THE TASK 400 SERIES - PLUM BROOK REACTOR FACILITY DECOMMISSIONING (PBRF) ENVIRONMENTAL AND SAFETY SUPPORT Key points: 1. Leidos, Inc. secured a significant contract for specialized environmental and safety services. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. The duration of the contract was over 5 years, suggesting a long-term need for these services. 4. The total award value of $20.8M was distributed across multiple delivery orders.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $20.8M over approximately 5 years appears reasonable for specialized environmental consulting services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale decommissioning support contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing as multiple vendors are encouraged to bid.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award likely resulted in a fair price, maximizing the value of taxpayer funds for essential environmental and safety services.
Public Impact
Ensures safe and compliant decommissioning of the Plum Brook Reactor Facility. Supports NASA's environmental stewardship and regulatory compliance. Provides critical safety oversight during a complex industrial process. Contributes to the responsible closure of a nuclear research facility.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in long-term environmental projects.
- Reliance on a single large contractor for critical safety functions.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Long-term contract indicates sustained need and potential for efficiency gains.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Environmental Consulting Services (NAICS 541620). Spending in this sector is driven by regulatory requirements, infrastructure projects, and environmental remediation efforts. NASA's spending aligns with its mission to manage complex facilities and ensure environmental safety.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded to Leidos, Inc., a large business. There is no indication of small business subcontracting in the provided data, suggesting limited direct impact on small businesses for this specific award.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by NASA, a federal agency with established oversight mechanisms. The multiple delivery orders suggest ongoing monitoring and management of the services provided.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Consulting Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may increase risk of scope creep or unforeseen costs.
- Potential for cost escalation over the 5+ year period.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the summary data.
- No clear indication of small business participation.
Tags
environmental-consulting-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, oh, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $20.8 million to LEIDOS, INC.. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY OFFICE SUPPORT (EMASS) TASK ORDER FOR THE TASK 400 SERIES - PLUM BROOK REACTOR FACILITY DECOMMISSIONING (PBRF) ENVIRONMENTAL AND SAFETY SUPPORT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $20.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-12-04. End: 2013-09-30.
What was the specific breakdown of the $20.8M across the multiple delivery orders, and how did pricing evolve over the contract's lifespan?
The provided data indicates 3 delivery orders totaling $20.8M. Without access to the individual delivery order details, it's impossible to determine the specific breakdown or how pricing evolved. Analyzing these details would reveal trends in cost and potential adjustments based on project needs or market conditions over the contract's duration.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for Leidos, Inc. under this contract, and how was their performance measured?
The data does not specify the KPIs or performance measurement criteria for Leidos, Inc. Typically, such contracts would include metrics related to safety compliance, environmental monitoring accuracy, adherence to decommissioning timelines, and reporting quality. NASA's contract management would involve regular performance reviews against these undefined metrics.
Were there any significant environmental incidents or safety concerns reported during the contract period that impacted the project's cost or timeline?
The provided data does not contain information on environmental incidents or safety concerns. A thorough review of NASA's contract performance reports and any associated incident logs would be necessary to assess if any such issues arose and their subsequent impact on the project's cost and schedule.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS, NOT R&D › SPECIAL STUDIES - NOT R and D
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: OTHER (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (3)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)
Address: 10260 CAMPUS POINT DR, SAN DIEGO, CA, 92121
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $21,149,603
Exercised Options: $21,149,603
Current Obligation: $20,834,885
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NNC08BA02B
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-12-04
Current End Date: 2013-09-30
Potential End Date: 2021-10-06 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-10-06
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →