NASA's $1.3B Facilities Contract for Human Space Flight Operations Awarded to Leidos Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $1,306,805,321 ($1.3B)
Contractor: Leidos Inc
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2008-11-07
End Date: 2018-02-28
Contract Duration: 3,400 days
Daily Burn Rate: $384.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: THE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONS CONTRACT(FDOC) SPECIFIES TECHNICAL, MANAGERIAL, AND ADMINSTRATIVE WORK NEEDED TO ENSURE THE AVAILABLITITY, INTEGRITY, AND RELIABILITY OF MISSIONOPERATIONS FACILITES SUPPORTING NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA) HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT (HSF) PROGRAMS REQUIRING MISSION OPERATIONS SUPPORT. THE OBJECTIVE OF THIS CONTRACT IS TO CONSOLIDATE EFFORTS ACROSS THE FACILITIES COVERED UNDER FODOC IN ORDER TO MAXIMIZE SYNERGY FOR HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, MODIFICATION, SUSTAINING. MAINTENANCE, RECONFIGURATION, AND OPERATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF REDUCING COST WITHOUT COMPROMISING FACILITY FUNCTIONALITY AND PERFORMANCE. NASA WILL COLLABORATE WITH THE CONTRACTOR ON DEVELOPING PROCEDURAL AND TECHNICAL INNOVATIONS THAT IMPROVE QUALITY, ENSURE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION AND REDUCE COST. MISSION OPERATIONS FACILITIES CURRENTLY SUPPORT THE SPACE SHUTTLE PROGRAMAND THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRA, INCLUDING INTERNATIONAL PARTNER AND COMMMERCIAL VISITING VEHICLES. MISSION OPERATIONS FACILITIES SUPPORTING THE CNSTELLATION PROGRAM(CXP) ARE CONTINUOUSLY UNDER DEVELOPMENT IN CONCERT WITH CXP FORMULATION AND IMPLEMENTATION. FDOC APPLIES TO THE FACILITIES OF THESE THREE PROGRAMS, AND ANY OTHER HSF PROGRAM REQUIRING MISSION OPERATIONS FACILITY SUPPORT. IN ADDITION, FUTURE MISSION OPERATIONS FACILITIES AND CAPABILITIES ARE WITHIN THE TECHNICAL SCOPE OF THIS SOW, AND FDOC WORLK ASSOCIATED WITH THESE FACILITIES WILL BE ENABLED THROUGH IDIQ.
Place of Performance
Location: HOUSTON, HARRIS County, TEXAS, 77058
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $1.31 billion to LEIDOS INC for work described as: THE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONS CONTRACT(FDOC) SPECIFIES TECHNICAL, MANAGERIAL, AND ADMINSTRATIVE WORK NEEDED TO ENSURE THE AVAILABLITITY, INTEGRITY, AND RELIABILITY OF MISSIONOPERATIONS FACILITES SUPPORTING NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA) HUMAN SPA… Key points: 1. Contract aims to consolidate facility support for NASA's Human Space Flight programs. 2. Focus on maximizing synergy for hardware/software development, maintenance, and operations. 3. Objective is cost reduction without compromising facility functionality and performance. 4. Leidos Inc. is the sole contractor for this extensive support. 5. The contract spans over 9 years, indicating long-term mission critical support.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $1.3 billion over 9 years suggests a significant investment in critical infrastructure. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities management contracts for complex government operations would be necessary for a precise value assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method is generally expected to yield fair pricing and good value for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The consolidation of efforts and focus on cost reduction without compromising performance are intended to provide taxpayer savings through increased efficiency and synergy.
Public Impact
Ensures the availability, integrity, and reliability of facilities crucial for NASA's human space flight missions. Supports the development of procedural and technical innovations to improve quality and ensure customer satisfaction. Aims to achieve cost efficiencies through consolidated operations and maximized synergy. Provides long-term, stable support for critical NASA infrastructure.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if synergy and innovation goals are not fully realized.
- Dependency on a single contractor (Leidos Inc.) for critical mission operations facilities.
- Long contract duration may limit flexibility to adapt to future technological changes.
Positive Signals
- Clear objective to reduce costs while maintaining performance.
- Focus on innovation and collaboration with the contractor.
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Research and Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences. The significant value and long duration are typical for large-scale, mission-critical infrastructure support contracts within government agencies like NASA.
Small Business Impact
The provided data does not indicate any specific provisions or participation levels for small businesses in this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business involvement.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract's objective to consolidate efforts and reduce costs suggests an inherent focus on efficiency. However, specific oversight mechanisms and accountability measures would need to be detailed in the contract to ensure effective performance and cost control.
Related Government Programs
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Long-term dependency on a single contractor.
- Potential for scope creep or cost overruns if not managed tightly.
- Risk of technological obsolescence over the contract's duration.
- Challenges in measuring and verifying cost savings and quality improvements.
Tags
research-and-development-in-the-physical, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, tx, definitive-contract, billion-dollar
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $1.31 billion to LEIDOS INC. THE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONS CONTRACT(FDOC) SPECIFIES TECHNICAL, MANAGERIAL, AND ADMINSTRATIVE WORK NEEDED TO ENSURE THE AVAILABLITITY, INTEGRITY, AND RELIABILITY OF MISSIONOPERATIONS FACILITES SUPPORTING NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA) HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT (HSF) PROGRAMS REQUIRING MISSION OPERATIONS SUPPORT. THE OBJECTIVE OF THIS CONTRACT IS TO CONSOLIDATE EFFORTS ACROSS THE FACILITIES COVERED UNDER FODOC IN ORDER TO MAXIMIZE SYNERGY FOR HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE DEV
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $1.31 billion.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-11-07. End: 2018-02-28.
What specific metrics are used to measure the 'reduction in cost' and 'improved quality' as stated in the contract's objectives?
The contract likely outlines Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) to quantify cost savings and quality improvements. These would typically include metrics related to facility uptime, maintenance response times, energy efficiency, and project completion rates for upgrades or modifications. A detailed review of the contract's performance work statement and award fee criteria would reveal these specific metrics.
How does NASA ensure that the consolidation of efforts truly maximizes synergy and avoids potential risks associated with integrating diverse facility operations?
NASA likely employs a robust program management structure with regular performance reviews and collaborative working groups involving both government personnel and Leidos Inc. representatives. The contract's award fee structure would incentivize the contractor to demonstrate successful synergy realization. Risk mitigation strategies would be embedded in the contract, requiring the contractor to identify and address potential integration challenges proactively.
Given the long duration of the contract (over 9 years), what mechanisms are in place to ensure the facilities and support remain technologically relevant and efficient?
The contract should include provisions for periodic reviews and potential modifications to incorporate technological advancements. The 'developing procedural and technical innovations' clause suggests an expectation for the contractor to propose and implement upgrades. NASA's oversight would be crucial in ensuring that the contractor remains incentivized to maintain state-of-the-art facilities and support services throughout the contract's lifecycle.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › Space R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Address: 2625 BAY AREA BLVD, HOUSTON, TX, 77058
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $1,464,453,127
Exercised Options: $1,314,606,475
Current Obligation: $1,306,805,321
Actual Outlays: $77,943
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-11-07
Current End Date: 2018-02-28
Potential End Date: 2018-02-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-08-21
More Contracts from Leidos Inc
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
- Military and Family Life Counseling. Requirement for Worldwide NON Medical Confidential Counseling Services — $1.0B (General Services Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →