NASA's $24.5M SIMLABS II Contract Awarded to Science Applications International Corporation
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $24,540,322 ($24.5M)
Contractor: Science Applications International Corporation
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2012-11-01
End Date: 2012-11-01
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Engineering Services
Official Description: IGF::CT,CL::IGF TECHNICAL SERVICES FOR AEROSPACE SYSTEMS MODELING AND SIMULATION II (SIMLABS II)
Place of Performance
Location: MOFFETT FIELD, SANTA CLARA County, CALIFORNIA, 94035
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $24.5 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for work described as: IGF::CT,CL::IGF TECHNICAL SERVICES FOR AEROSPACE SYSTEMS MODELING AND SIMULATION II (SIMLABS II) Key points: 1. Contract value of $24.5 million for aerospace systems modeling and simulation. 2. Awarded via full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. Risk appears moderate given the definitive contract type and established contractor. 4. Sector is Engineering Services, crucial for aerospace research and development.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF), which allows for performance-based incentives. Pricing assessment would require comparison to similar modeling and simulation contracts, but the competitive award suggests a reasonable price discovery process.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting multiple bidders participated. This method generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a more cost-effective solution for NASA's modeling and simulation needs.
Public Impact
Supports critical aerospace research and development for NASA. Enhances capabilities in modeling and simulation for complex systems. Potential for technological advancements stemming from the simulation services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition ensures broad market participation.
- Contract type allows for performance-based incentives.
- Established contractor with experience in the field.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting aerospace modeling and simulation. Spending in this area is vital for innovation and maintaining technological leadership in the aerospace industry.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business subcontracting opportunities were mandated or pursued.
Oversight & Accountability
NASA's procurement processes and the Inspector General's office provide oversight. The definitive contract structure allows for clear deliverables and accountability, though performance monitoring is key.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns inherent in CPAF contracts if not closely managed.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical simulation services.
- Lack of small business participation noted in the award data.
- Contract duration and specific performance metrics require further review for long-term value.
Tags
engineering-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, ca, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $24.5 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION. IGF::CT,CL::IGF TECHNICAL SERVICES FOR AEROSPACE SYSTEMS MODELING AND SIMULATION II (SIMLABS II)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $24.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2012-11-01. End: 2012-11-01.
What specific modeling and simulation capabilities does SIMLABS II provide, and how do they align with NASA's current strategic objectives?
SIMLABS II likely provides advanced computational modeling and simulation services essential for designing, testing, and validating aerospace systems. This could include areas like aerodynamics, structural analysis, propulsion, and mission planning. Alignment with NASA's objectives would depend on current priorities, such as lunar missions, Mars exploration, or next-generation aircraft development, where sophisticated simulations are crucial for risk reduction and performance optimization.
What are the key performance metrics and award fee criteria for this Cost Plus Award Fee contract?
Key performance metrics for a CPAF contract like SIMLABS II would typically focus on technical performance, schedule adherence, and cost control. Award fee criteria are defined in the contract and incentivize the contractor to exceed minimum requirements. Examples could include achieving specific simulation accuracy levels, delivering results ahead of schedule, or demonstrating innovative approaches to complex modeling challenges, all contributing to NASA's mission success.
How does the cost of this contract compare to similar modeling and simulation services procured by other government agencies or in the private sector?
Benchmarking the cost of this $24.5 million contract requires access to detailed cost data and comparison with similar, competitively awarded contracts for specialized aerospace modeling and simulation services. Factors like contract duration, specific technical requirements, and the level of expertise needed influence pricing. Without specific comparative data, it's difficult to definitively assess cost-effectiveness, though the full and open competition suggests a market-driven price.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › General Science and Technology R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1710 SAIC DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $75,608,912
Exercised Options: $28,996,392
Current Obligation: $24,540,322
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 90
Total Subaward Amount: $6,721,736
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2012-11-01
Current End Date: 2012-11-01
Potential End Date: 2014-10-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-04-26
More Contracts from Science Applications International Corporation
- Task Order to Provide Project Management Support, Transition Support, Engineering and Design Support, Securing the Infrastructure Support and O&M Support for the Department's IT Consolidation Program — $2.1B (Department of State)
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (General Services Administration)
- Unified Nasa Information Technology Services (unites) — $1.4B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (General Services Administration)
- This Effort IS for a Follow on Procurement Requirement. the Name of This Procurement IS the Omnibus Multidiscipline Engineering Services (omes) II. the Principal Purpose of This Contract IS to Provide Multidiscipline Engineering Support Services and Related Work to EED, Istd, SED, MSD, Mesa, Jpss, Ssco, and Related Organizations, AS Required, for the Study, Design, Systems Engineering, Development, Fabrication, Integration, Testing, Verification, and Operations of Space Flight, Airborne, and Ground System Hardware and Software, Including Development and Validation of NEW Technologies to Enable Future Space and Science Missions. to This END, the Contractor Shall Provide On/Off-Site Multidiscipline Engineering Services, Pursuant to Task Orders Issued by the Contracting Officer. These Services Shall Include the Personnel, Facilities, and Materials (unless Otherwise Provided by the Government) to Accomplish the Tasks. Travel MAY BE Required by the Contractor to Support Certain Task Orders, These Travel Requirements Will BE Identified on a Task by Task Basis — $1.0B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
View all Science Applications International Corporation federal contracts →
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →