DoD's $10M contract with MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. for technical services shows fair value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,057,869 ($10.1M)

Contractor: Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-01-24

End Date: 2007-02-28

Contract Duration: 765 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: HERNDON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20171

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.1 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the duration and scope of services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment. 3. No specific risk indicators are immediately apparent from the provided data. 4. Services provided fall under a broad professional, scientific, and technical category. 5. This contract represents a small portion of overall defense spending in its category. 6. The contract was awarded under a definitive contract type.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's total value of $10,057,869 over approximately two years suggests a monthly expenditure of around $419,000. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, a direct comparison to similar contracts is challenging. However, the cost-no-fee structure implies that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator for the government. Benchmarking against market rates for 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' would require more granular data on the specific tasks performed.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This method typically fosters a competitive environment, encouraging multiple bidders to offer their best pricing and technical solutions. The presence of competition is generally a positive sign for price discovery and achieving value for money.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition as it is expected to drive down prices through market forces, ensuring that the government is not overpaying for services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Department of Defense, receiving professional, scientific, and technical services. The services delivered likely support various defense-related initiatives and operations. The geographic impact is centered around the agency's operational needs, with potential for broader national security implications. Workforce implications would involve skilled professionals contributing to specialized technical and scientific tasks.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
Definitive contract type provides a clear framework for service delivery.
Contract duration of over two years allows for sustained support.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls under the broad 'Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' sector, specifically NAICS code 541990. This sector is crucial for government operations, providing specialized expertise that agencies may not possess internally. Comparable spending in this sector can vary widely depending on the specific services rendered, but it generally represents a significant portion of government contracting, supporting innovation and operational needs across various agencies.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss and sb fields) was not a specific set-aside for this contract. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from set-aside requirements for this particular award. However, prime contractors in such large contracts may still engage small businesses as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), which is responsible for ensuring contractor performance and compliance. Accountability measures are inherent in the contract terms and performance expectations. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases, though detailed performance reports are often not publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Defense Contract Services
Professional and Technical Services
Scientific Research and Development Support

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.1 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-01-24. End: 2007-02-28.

What specific types of 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' were rendered under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact nature of the 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' rendered. This category (NAICS 541990) is broad and can encompass a wide range of activities, including research and development support, technical consulting, laboratory testing, and specialized scientific analysis. To understand the precise services, one would need to consult the contract's statement of work or task orders, which are not included in the summary data. This lack of specificity makes it difficult to benchmark against highly similar contracts or assess the true value proposition.

How does the $10M contract value compare to similar DoD contracts for technical services over a similar period?

Directly comparing the $10,057,869 contract value to similar Department of Defense (DoD) contracts for technical services is challenging without more granular details on the specific services provided. The 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' category is very broad. However, for a contract spanning approximately two years (765 days), this value translates to roughly $13,148 per day or $419,000 per month. This figure needs to be assessed against the complexity, criticality, and specialized nature of the services. Larger, more complex R&D or engineering support contracts could easily exceed this amount, while simpler consulting tasks might be lower. The full and open competition suggests market rates were likely considered.

What are the potential risks associated with a 'Cost No Fee' (CNF) contract type for the government?

A 'Cost No Fee' (CNF) contract type, as indicated for this award, means the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs but receives no fee or profit. For the government, the primary risk is that the contractor may have less incentive to control costs, as their profit is not directly tied to cost efficiency. This could potentially lead to higher overall costs if not managed diligently through robust oversight. However, CNF contracts are often used when the scope of work is uncertain or when the government wants to ensure the contractor is fully focused on performing the required work without the added complexity of negotiating a fee. The government's risk is mitigated by strong performance monitoring and cost auditing.

What was the historical spending pattern for this specific service category (NAICS 541990) by the Department of Defense prior to this contract?

The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for NAICS 541990 by the Department of Defense (DoD) prior to this contract's award in January 2005. To analyze historical trends, one would need access to historical contract databases that track spending by specific NAICS codes and agencies over time. Understanding past spending levels would help contextualize the $10M award, indicating whether it represents an increase, decrease, or consistent level of investment in these types of services. Such analysis is crucial for budget planning and identifying shifts in procurement priorities.

How effective was MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. in fulfilling previous DoD contracts, and does this inform the value of this award?

The provided data does not include information on the past performance or track record of MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. with the Department of Defense (DoD) or other agencies. Assessing contractor effectiveness typically requires reviewing past performance evaluations, contract close-out reports, or any documented instances of outstanding performance or deficiencies. Without this information, it is difficult to definitively state how their past performance might inform the value or risk associated with this specific $10M contract. A contractor with a history of successful, on-time, and within-budget performance generally commands more confidence.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › N – Health R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Mantech International Corporation

Address: 12015 LEE JACKSON HIGHWAY, FAIRFAX, VA, 22033

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline