Orbis Sibro Inc. awarded $16.1M for Naval shipyard SETA support, with 3 bids received
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,094,195 ($16.1M)
Contractor: Orbis Sibro Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2023-05-18
End Date: 2026-05-17
Contract Duration: 1,095 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: SCIENTIFIC, ENGINEERING, TECHNICAL, AND ANALYTICAL (SETA) SUPPORT FOR: NAVAL SEA (NAVSEA), CORPORATE 6 (C-6) NAVAL SHIPYARDS
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20376
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $16.1 million to ORBIS SIBRO INC for work described as: SCIENTIFIC, ENGINEERING, TECHNICAL, AND ANALYTICAL (SETA) SUPPORT FOR: NAVAL SEA (NAVSEA), CORPORATE 6 (C-6) NAVAL SHIPYARDS Key points: 1. Contract value of $16.1 million over three years suggests a moderate investment in specialized engineering support. 2. Full and open competition indicates a potentially competitive bidding environment, which can drive better pricing. 3. The contract type (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) carries inherent risk of cost overruns, requiring close oversight. 4. This award falls within the Engineering Services NAICS code, a common category for technical support. 5. The duration of 1095 days (3 years) allows for sustained support but necessitates performance monitoring. 6. The absence of small business set-aside or subcontracting requirements may limit opportunities for smaller firms.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $16.1 million for three years of SETA support appears reasonable for specialized engineering services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for naval shipyard support would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type, while allowing flexibility, can lead to higher costs if not managed diligently. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, a definitive value assessment is challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, with three bids received. This level of competition is generally positive, suggesting that multiple capable firms were aware of and interested in the requirement. Three bidders indicate a moderate level of competition, which typically allows for price discovery and can incentivize bidders to offer competitive terms. However, it's not as robust as a larger number of bidders, which might further drive down costs.
Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition with three bidders suggests that taxpayers likely received a fair price, as multiple companies vied for the contract. This competitive process helps prevent inflated pricing that might occur with less competition.
Public Impact
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) and Naval Shipyards benefit from specialized engineering, technical, and analytical support. Services delivered are critical for the maintenance, modernization, and operational readiness of naval vessels. The primary geographic impact is within the District of Columbia, where the contract is managed or services are rendered. The contract supports a workforce of engineers, analysts, and technical specialists, potentially including subject matter experts.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type introduces risk of cost escalation if not closely monitored.
- Limited number of bidders (3) may not represent the full competitive landscape, potentially impacting optimal pricing.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess efficiency and effectiveness.
- No indication of small business participation or subcontracting requirements could limit broader economic impact.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a fair and transparent procurement process.
- Contract duration of three years allows for continuity of essential technical and analytical support.
- The contract addresses critical needs for naval shipyards, contributing to national defense readiness.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting naval shipyards. The market for such specialized technical and analytical support is driven by defense spending and the need for expertise in complex maritime engineering. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within the broader Department of Defense procurement data for similar technical support services, often categorized under professional services or engineering consulting.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor is there an explicit mention of subcontracting requirements. This suggests that the primary award went to a large business, Orbis Sibro Inc. Consequently, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem through this specific contract may be limited unless Orbis Sibro voluntarily engages small businesses as subcontractors. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be needed to fully assess the impact.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Department of the Navy and NAVSEA contracting officers. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract terms, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Naval Shipyard Operations and Maintenance
- Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Contracts
- Engineering and Technical Support Services
- Department of Defense Professional Services
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type carries inherent risk of cost overruns.
- Limited number of bidders may not represent maximum competitive pressure.
- Lack of explicit small business subcontracting requirements.
- Performance metrics not detailed in summary data.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, navsea, engineering-services, full-and-open-competition, cost-plus-fixed-fee, delivery-order, scientific-engineering-technical-and-analytical-support, naval-shipyards, district-of-columbia, large-business
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $16.1 million to ORBIS SIBRO INC. SCIENTIFIC, ENGINEERING, TECHNICAL, AND ANALYTICAL (SETA) SUPPORT FOR: NAVAL SEA (NAVSEA), CORPORATE 6 (C-6) NAVAL SHIPYARDS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ORBIS SIBRO INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $16.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-05-18. End: 2026-05-17.
What is the track record of Orbis Sibro Inc. in performing similar SETA contracts for the Department of Defense?
A thorough review of Orbis Sibro Inc.'s contract history within the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) would be necessary to assess their track record. Specifically, one would look for past awards for Scientific, Engineering, Technical, and Analytical (SETA) support, particularly for naval or maritime entities. Key performance indicators from previous contracts, such as on-time delivery, adherence to budget, and customer satisfaction ratings (if available), would provide insight into their capabilities and reliability. Analyzing the value and duration of prior similar contracts can also indicate their experience level in managing complex technical support requirements for the government.
How does the awarded value compare to similar SETA support contracts for naval shipyards?
To benchmark the $16.1 million award for Orbis Sibro Inc., one would need to identify comparable contracts awarded to other firms for SETA support at naval shipyards over the past 3-5 years. Factors to consider include the scope of work, duration, specific technical requirements, and the number of bidders. For instance, if similar three-year contracts for comparable services at other naval facilities typically range from $10 million to $20 million, then this award appears to be within the expected market range. Conversely, if comparable contracts are significantly lower or higher, it might indicate either exceptional value or potential overpricing/underbidding.
What are the primary risks associated with the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type for this SETA support?
The primary risk with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract is the potential for cost overruns. While the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs, the fixed fee provides a set profit margin. If the contractor's costs exceed projections significantly, they may incur losses, potentially impacting performance or morale. Conversely, the government bears the risk of paying higher-than-expected costs if the contractor is not efficient. Effective oversight, detailed cost tracking, and robust negotiation of the fixed fee are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure value for the taxpayer.
How effective is the 'full and open competition' with three bidders in ensuring competitive pricing for this contract?
Full and open competition is generally the most effective method for ensuring competitive pricing, as it allows any responsible source to submit an offer. With three bidders, there is a reasonable level of competition, suggesting that Orbis Sibro Inc. likely submitted a competitive proposal to win the contract. However, the optimal level of competition often involves four or more bidders, which can further drive down prices and increase innovation. The effectiveness here depends on whether these three bidders represented the majority of capable sources and how aggressively they competed on price and technical merit.
What is the historical spending trend for SETA support at Naval Shipyards?
Analyzing historical spending trends for SETA support at Naval Shipyards requires accessing comprehensive federal procurement data over several fiscal years. One would look at the total amount obligated annually for contracts with similar scopes of work (engineering, technical, analytical support) and for entities like NAVSEA or specific shipyard commands. Trends might reveal increasing or decreasing demand for such services, shifts in dominant contractors, or changes in average contract values. Understanding these patterns can help contextualize the current $16.1 million award and anticipate future budgetary needs or potential market saturation.
Are there any specific performance metrics or deliverables outlined in the contract that indicate success criteria?
The provided summary data does not include specific performance metrics or deliverables for this contract. Typically, a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract would include a Performance Work Statement (PWS) or Statement of Work (SOW) detailing the required services, deliverables, and associated quality standards. Success criteria would be defined within these documents, often tied to milestones, technical accuracy, timeliness, and adherence to specifications. Without access to the full contract documentation, assessing the specific criteria for success and the contractor's ability to meet them is not possible.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: N6426723R3003
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 238 ALBEMARLE RD, CHARLESTON, SC, 29407
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $34,132,407
Exercised Options: $19,791,637
Current Obligation: $16,094,195
Actual Outlays: $892,688
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0017819D8239
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-05-18
Current End Date: 2026-05-17
Potential End Date: 2028-05-17 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-08
More Contracts from Orbis Sibro Inc
- THE Contractor Shall Perform ALL Tasks Required and Delineated in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) to Support System Level Technical Expertise in the Functional Areas of Cyber Security/Information Assurance (IA) Support, Technical Data Support, System Architecture&engineering, Coding/Programming, Database Administration, System / WEB Server / Application Server Administration, Customer Support, Engineering&technical Support, and Training&instruction Support — $32.6M (Department of Defense)
- Technical, Programmatic and Information Technology Support Services in Support of SEA21 — $27.4M (Department of Defense)
- Professional Support Services for Navsea SEA10 Corporate Operations & Total Force and SEA00 Office of the Commander — $27.3M (Department of Defense)
- 200406!000085!1700!BY006 !navsea Washington DC !gs23f0185n !C!N! !n!n0002404fb034! !20040218!20040930!872942706!872942706!872942706!n!orbis Inc !2557 John Boone CT !mount Pleasant !sc!29466!48535!019!45!mount Pleasant !charleston !S Carolina!+000000225000!n!n!000000000000!r408!program Management/Support Services !c9e!all Other Supplies and Equipment !000 !* !541611!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !y!b!y!n! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $26.0M (Department of Defense)
- Provide Engineering and Logistics Services to Navsea 04LR — $25.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)