Navy awards $260M+ for program management, with Orbis Inc. securing a significant portion

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $26,049,503 ($26.0M)

Contractor: Orbis Sibro Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-02-18

End Date: 2010-06-22

Contract Duration: 2,316 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200406!000085!1700!BY006 !NAVSEA WASHINGTON DC !GS23F0185N !C!N! !N!N0002404FB034! !20040218!20040930!872942706!872942706!872942706!N!ORBIS INC !2557 JOHN BOONE CT !MOUNT PLEASANT !SC!29466!48535!019!45!MOUNT PLEASANT !CHARLESTON !S CAROLINA!+000000225000!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT !000 !* !541611!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!B!Y!N! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: MOUNT PLEASANT, CHARLESTON County, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29466

State: South Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $26.0 million to ORBIS SIBRO INC for work described as: 200406!000085!1700!BY006 !NAVSEA WASHINGTON DC !GS23F0185N !C!N! !N!N0002404FB034! !20040218!20040930!872942706!872942706!872942706!N!ORBIS INC !2557 JOHN BOONE CT !MOUNT PLEASANT !SC!29466!48535!019!45!MOUNT PLEASANT !CHAR… Key points: 1. Contract focuses on program management and support services, indicating a need for specialized expertise. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 3. A substantial value suggests a long-term or high-impact program requiring consistent support. 4. The contract duration spans over 6 years, pointing to ongoing program requirements. 5. The primary service category is program management, a critical function for complex government initiatives. 6. The award was a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The total award value of over $260 million for program management and support services appears substantial. Benchmarking this against similar contracts is challenging without more specific details on the scope of services. However, the duration of the contract (over 6 years) suggests a consistent need for these services. The pricing structure, while not detailed here, would be a key factor in a full value assessment. Given the competitive nature of the award, it's likely that pricing was scrutinized.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific award. A higher number of bidders generally leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of innovative solutions. However, three bidders still provide a reasonable basis for price discovery and selection of the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages multiple companies to bid, driving down prices and ensuring the government receives the best possible value for its investment.

Public Impact

The Department of the Navy benefits from sustained program management and support services, crucial for its operational effectiveness. This contract supports critical defense programs, ensuring efficient execution and oversight. The services are likely delivered within the United States, supporting the Navy's domestic and global operations. The contract may have implications for a specialized workforce in program management and related support fields.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if program requirements are not clearly defined and managed.
Reliance on a single contractor for extended periods could lead to complacency or reduced innovation.
The significant value of the contract could make it a target for future budget cuts or re-evaluations.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a fair and transparent process.
The contract duration indicates a stable and predictable need for these services.
The focus on program management suggests a commitment to structured and efficient project execution.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on program management. This sector is vital for government operations, providing essential expertise for complex projects. The market for program management services is competitive, with many firms offering specialized skills. The Navy's spending in this area is consistent with its need to manage large-scale, technologically advanced programs.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract was specifically set aside for small businesses. Given the substantial value and specialized nature of program management services, it is likely that larger, established firms were the primary bidders. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist, but this would depend on the prime contractor's strategy and the specific requirements of the program.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be embedded within the contract terms, including performance metrics, reporting requirements, and potential penalties for non-compliance. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and public reporting, although specific program details may be sensitive.

Related Government Programs

Program Management Support Services
Defense Contract Management
Naval Operations Support
Professional Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract Duration
Large Contract Value
Potential for Scope Creep

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $26.0 million to ORBIS SIBRO INC. 200406!000085!1700!BY006 !NAVSEA WASHINGTON DC !GS23F0185N !C!N! !N!N0002404FB034! !20040218!20040930!872942706!872942706!872942706!N!ORBIS INC !2557 JOHN BOONE CT !MOUNT PLEASANT !SC!29466!48535!019!45!MOUNT PLEASANT !CHARLESTON !S CAROLINA!+000000225000!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT !000 !* !541611!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ORBIS SIBRO INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $26.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-02-18. End: 2010-06-22.

What is the specific nature of the program management and support services being provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES' under NAICS code 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services). While the exact tasks are not detailed, this typically involves planning, organizing, directing, and controlling government projects or programs. Support services can encompass a wide range of activities such as logistical support, technical assistance, financial management, and administrative functions necessary for the successful execution of the primary program objectives. The contract's value and duration suggest it supports a significant, ongoing initiative within the Department of the Navy.

How does the awarded amount of over $260 million compare to typical spending on similar program management contracts within the Department of Defense?

The awarded amount of over $260 million for program management and support services is substantial, placing it among significant contract awards. Within the Department of Defense (DoD), large-scale program management contracts can range from tens of millions to billions of dollars, depending on the complexity, duration, and criticality of the program. For instance, major defense acquisition programs often involve extensive program management support that runs into hundreds of millions over several years. This $260M+ award, spread over approximately 6 years, suggests a significant but not unprecedented level of investment for sustained support of a key Navy initiative. A precise comparison would require analyzing contracts with identical scope and duration within the DoD.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to assess the performance of Orbis Inc. under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to assess Orbis Inc.'s performance. However, for program management and support services contracts of this nature, typical KPIs often include on-time delivery of milestones, adherence to budget, quality of deliverables (e.g., reports, analyses), effectiveness of communication and coordination, and overall client satisfaction. Performance is usually evaluated through regular progress reports, formal reviews, and potentially through contractor performance assessment reporting (CPAR) systems. The contract itself would detail these specific performance standards and the methods for their measurement.

What is the historical spending pattern for program management services by the Department of the Navy, and how does this contract fit in?

The Department of the Navy consistently spends significant amounts on program management and support services, as these are critical for overseeing complex defense acquisition programs, research and development initiatives, and operational support functions. Historical spending data would show a continuous need for these services across various naval commands and projects. This specific contract, valued at over $260 million and spanning over six years, represents a substantial, long-term commitment to a particular program or set of programs. It fits within the broader pattern of the Navy outsourcing specialized management functions to leverage external expertise and ensure efficient program execution, reflecting a sustained investment in program oversight.

Are there any identified risks associated with this contract, such as contractor performance issues or potential cost overruns?

The provided data does not explicitly detail any specific risks associated with this contract, such as past performance issues with Orbis Inc. or projected cost overruns. However, any large, long-term contract inherently carries risks. Potential risks for this type of contract could include the contractor's ability to maintain performance levels over the extended period, adapt to evolving program requirements, manage subcontractors effectively, and control costs. Without access to CPARs or detailed program reviews, a comprehensive risk assessment is not possible. The fact that it was awarded under full and open competition might suggest that potential risks were evaluated during the bidding process.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (2)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2557 JOHN BOONE CT, MOUNT PLEASANT, SC, 29466

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Woman Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS23F0185N

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline