Dod Awards $6M+ Contract for Combat Systems Testing to Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,058,054 ($6.1M)

Contractor: Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-10-27

End Date: 2026-11-30

Contract Duration: 399 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: TEST AND EVALUATION OF COMBAT SYSTEMS/WEAPON SYSTEMS

Place of Performance

Location: HERNDON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20171

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $6.1 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. for work described as: TEST AND EVALUATION OF COMBAT SYSTEMS/WEAPON SYSTEMS Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized engineering services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for these services. 3. Contract duration of over a year indicates a significant scope of work. 4. Cost-plus fixed fee pricing structure requires careful monitoring of costs. 5. This contract supports critical defense readiness and technological advancement. 6. Virginia-based contractor selected, potentially impacting local workforce.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $6 million for a period of 399 days appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized engineering services related to combat and weapon systems testing and evaluation. Benchmarking against similar contracts for complex defense system development and testing would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The cost-plus fixed fee (CPFF) pricing structure, while common for R&D and complex services, necessitates robust oversight to ensure costs remain controlled and justified.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of two bidders suggests a competitive environment, which typically drives better pricing and innovation. The specific details of the bidding process, including the number of proposals received and the evaluation criteria, would offer further insight into the effectiveness of the competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to more cost-effective solutions and prevent price gouging.

Public Impact

The Department of the Navy benefits from enhanced testing and evaluation of its combat and weapon systems. This contract supports the development and refinement of critical defense technologies. The primary geographic impact is within Virginia, where the contractor is based. Potential positive implications for the specialized engineering and defense technology workforce in Virginia.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost-plus fixed fee contracts can incentivize cost overruns if not managed tightly.
The duration of the contract (399 days) requires sustained oversight to ensure milestones are met.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive marketplace.
Contract supports critical defense systems, aligning with national security objectives.
Contractor is based in Virginia, potentially supporting the regional economy.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), a critical component of the defense industrial base. The market for specialized combat and weapon systems testing is highly technical and often dominated by a few key players with the necessary expertise and security clearances. Spending in this area is directly tied to defense modernization efforts and the need for rigorous validation of new and existing military technologies. Comparable spending benchmarks would likely be found within other Department of Defense contracts for system development, integration, and testing.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a set-aside requirement. However, the prime contractor may choose to subcontract portions of the work to small businesses, which would be a positive development for the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will primarily reside with the Department of the Navy contracting officers and program managers. The cost-plus fixed fee structure necessitates diligent financial oversight to ensure that costs incurred by the contractor are reasonable, allocable, and allowable. Transparency will depend on the reporting requirements stipulated in the contract and the agency's commitment to public disclosure of contract performance information. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Combat Systems Development
Weapon Systems Testing
Defense Engineering Services
Naval Technology Modernization
Systems Integration and Testing

Risk Flags

Cost-plus fixed fee pricing requires diligent oversight to manage potential cost overruns.
Contract duration necessitates sustained monitoring of performance and milestones.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $6.1 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.. TEST AND EVALUATION OF COMBAT SYSTEMS/WEAPON SYSTEMS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-27. End: 2026-11-30.

What is the track record of MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. with the Department of Defense, particularly in contracts related to combat systems testing?

MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. has a history of performing services for the Department of Defense. While specific details on past performance in combat systems testing require deeper database analysis, their presence as a bidder and awardee in this domain suggests they possess relevant capabilities. A thorough review would involve examining past contract awards, performance evaluations (if publicly available), and any reported issues or successes on similar projects. Understanding their experience with cost-plus fixed fee contracts and the specific types of combat systems they have previously worked with would provide further context on their suitability for this current award.

How does the awarded amount of approximately $6 million compare to similar contracts for combat systems testing and evaluation services within the DoD?

To benchmark the $6 million award, one would need to analyze recent contracts awarded by the Department of Defense for similar services, such as 'Test and Evaluation of Combat Systems/Weapon Systems' or related engineering services (NAICS 541330). Factors like contract duration, scope of work complexity, specific weapon systems involved, and the level of security clearance required significantly influence pricing. A preliminary assessment suggests the amount is moderate for specialized defense engineering, but a comprehensive comparison would involve identifying contracts with comparable parameters. The fact that it was competed under 'full and open' suggests market rates were likely considered during the bidding process.

What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for this type of service, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risk with a CPFF contract is the potential for the contractor to incur costs exceeding initial estimates, which could lead to budget overruns if not managed effectively. The 'fixed fee' component provides the contractor with a guaranteed profit margin, but the government bears the risk of increased costs. Mitigation strategies include robust government oversight, detailed cost tracking and auditing, clear definition of contract scope to prevent scope creep, and strong negotiation of indirect cost rates. Regular performance reviews and adherence to established milestones are crucial to ensure the contractor remains efficient and costs are controlled within the anticipated range.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the readiness and technological advancement of the Department of the Navy's combat systems?

This contract is expected to have a direct positive impact on the readiness and technological advancement of the Department of the Navy's combat systems. By providing essential testing and evaluation services, it ensures that these complex systems are functioning as intended, are reliable under operational conditions, and meet performance specifications. Rigorous testing helps identify and rectify potential flaws or vulnerabilities before deployment, thereby enhancing combat effectiveness and reducing risks to personnel. Furthermore, the insights gained from testing can inform future design improvements and the development of next-generation weapon systems, contributing to the Navy's overall technological superiority.

How has historical spending by the Department of Defense on combat systems testing and evaluation evolved, and does this contract align with those trends?

Historical spending by the Department of Defense on combat systems testing and evaluation has generally trended upwards, driven by the continuous need to modernize aging platforms, counter evolving threats, and integrate new technologies. This $6 million contract, while specific to a particular award, aligns with the broader trend of sustained investment in ensuring the efficacy and reliability of defense systems. Analyzing multi-year spending patterns for similar services would reveal whether this award represents a typical investment or a significant deviation. Factors such as geopolitical tensions, budget allocations, and strategic priorities heavily influence these spending trends.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N0017821R3011

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Mantech International Corporation

Address: 2251 CORPORATE PARK DR STE 600, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $34,408,869

Exercised Options: $22,020,336

Current Obligation: $6,058,054

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017819D8070

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline