DoD awards $22.5M for Engineering Services to ORBIS SIBRO INC, a single delivery order
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $22,560,496 ($22.6M)
Contractor: Orbis Sibro Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2017-04-05
End Date: 2018-04-04
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $62.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF
Place of Performance
Location: CHARLESTON, CHARLESTON County, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29407
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $22.6 million to ORBIS SIBRO INC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF Key points: 1. Contract awarded for Engineering Services with a value of $22.5M. 2. The contract was awarded via Full and Open Competition. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Incentive Fee. 4. The contract was awarded to ORBIS SIBRO INC. 5. The contract duration is 364 days.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $22.5M for 364 days of engineering services appears within a reasonable range for specialized technical support. However, without specific details on the scope of services, a precise benchmark is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under Full and Open Competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better value for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently for necessary engineering services.
Public Impact
Ensures critical engineering services are available for Department of Defense operations. Supports the Defense Contract Management Agency's mission. The competitive nature of the award suggests a focus on achieving value for money.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Incentive Fee contracts can lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored.
- Lack of specific service details makes it hard to assess true value.
- Single delivery order may indicate a narrow scope or specific need.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through Full and Open Competition.
- Contract supports critical defense operations.
- Clear contract duration and award amount.
Sector Analysis
Engineering services are crucial for the defense sector, supporting design, development, and maintenance of military systems. Spending benchmarks vary widely based on specialization and project complexity.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate if small businesses were involved in this specific contract award. Further analysis would be needed to determine subcontracting opportunities or prime participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The Defense Contract Management Agency is responsible for oversight. The use of a Cost Plus Incentive Fee contract requires diligent monitoring to ensure cost control and performance.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPIF contract type.
- Lack of detailed service scope hinders value assessment.
- Limited insight into small business participation.
- Single delivery order may indicate a limited scope or potential for follow-on work.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, sc, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $22.6 million to ORBIS SIBRO INC. IGF::OT::IGF
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ORBIS SIBRO INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $22.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2017-04-05. End: 2018-04-04.
What specific engineering services were procured under this contract, and how do they align with the agency's strategic needs?
The contract specifies 'Engineering Services' but lacks granular detail on the exact nature of the work. Understanding if these services relate to system design, testing, maintenance, or research is crucial. Alignment with agency needs would depend on whether these services directly support current defense programs, modernization efforts, or operational readiness.
What were the key performance metrics and incentive structures within the Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) arrangement?
The CPIF structure implies that both the contractor's profit and the final cost are adjustable based on performance against pre-defined targets. Key metrics could include schedule adherence, technical performance, or cost savings. Understanding these specific targets and the associated incentive/disincentive clauses is vital for assessing potential cost efficiencies and contractor motivation.
How does the $22.5M award compare to similar engineering service contracts awarded by the DoD in the same period?
Benchmarking this $22.5M award requires comparing it against contracts for similar engineering services (e.g., by NAICS code 541330) with comparable durations and complexity. Factors like geographic location, specific technical requirements, and the competitive landscape influence pricing. A preliminary assessment suggests it's within a plausible range, but detailed comparative analysis is needed for a definitive conclusion.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: N0002416R3031
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 238 ALBEMARLE RD, CHARLESTON, SC, 29407
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $34,065,741
Exercised Options: $29,884,684
Current Obligation: $22,560,496
Actual Outlays: $6,809,956
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0017804D4100
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2017-04-05
Current End Date: 2018-04-04
Potential End Date: 2018-04-04 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-07-14
More Contracts from Orbis Sibro Inc
- THE Contractor Shall Perform ALL Tasks Required and Delineated in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) to Support System Level Technical Expertise in the Functional Areas of Cyber Security/Information Assurance (IA) Support, Technical Data Support, System Architecture&engineering, Coding/Programming, Database Administration, System / WEB Server / Application Server Administration, Customer Support, Engineering&technical Support, and Training&instruction Support — $32.6M (Department of Defense)
- Technical, Programmatic and Information Technology Support Services in Support of SEA21 — $27.4M (Department of Defense)
- Professional Support Services for Navsea SEA10 Corporate Operations & Total Force and SEA00 Office of the Commander — $27.3M (Department of Defense)
- 200406!000085!1700!BY006 !navsea Washington DC !gs23f0185n !C!N! !n!n0002404fb034! !20040218!20040930!872942706!872942706!872942706!n!orbis Inc !2557 John Boone CT !mount Pleasant !sc!29466!48535!019!45!mount Pleasant !charleston !S Carolina!+000000225000!n!n!000000000000!r408!program Management/Support Services !c9e!all Other Supplies and Equipment !000 !* !541611!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !y!b!y!n! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $26.0M (Department of Defense)
- Provide Engineering and Logistics Services to Navsea 04LR — $25.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)