Dod's $5.4M Engineering Services Contract Awarded to Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,406,420 ($5.4M)

Contractor: Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-05-30

End Date: 2026-08-19

Contract Duration: 446 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: ENGINEERING AND MARINE SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE NSWCCDD MISSION

Place of Performance

Location: VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA BEACH CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23459

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $5.4 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. for work described as: ENGINEERING AND MARINE SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE NSWCCDD MISSION Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. 3. The duration of 446 days indicates a medium-term engagement for engineering services. 4. The award is a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger contract vehicle. 5. The small business set-aside flag is false, meaning it was not specifically targeted for small businesses. 6. The contract is for engineering services, a critical component for naval operations and mission support.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount is $5.4 million. Without specific benchmarks for similar engineering support services for the NSWCCDD mission, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type introduces inherent risk for cost control, as contractor profit is fixed regardless of actual costs incurred. This necessitates robust oversight to ensure costs remain reasonable and that the fixed fee is justified by the scope of work.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific requirement. While competition is generally beneficial for price discovery, the actual competitiveness depends on the number of qualified bidders and the intensity of their proposals.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a more competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and innovative solutions. The fact that multiple companies bid suggests that taxpayer funds are likely being used more efficiently than in a sole-source scenario.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Naval Surface Warfare Center Corona Division (NSWCCDD) and its mission objectives, which rely on specialized engineering and marine services. The services delivered will support the operational readiness and effectiveness of naval warfare capabilities. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around naval facilities where NSWCCDD operates, primarily in Virginia. The contract supports specialized engineering roles, potentially impacting the workforce in the defense technology and marine engineering sectors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can incentivize higher spending if not closely monitored.
Limited public information on the specific engineering tasks may hinder a full understanding of value.
The duration of the contract could lead to scope creep if not managed effectively.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive process.
The contract supports a critical naval mission, suggesting alignment with defense priorities.
The contractor, MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC., has a track record in defense contracting.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical component of the broader defense industrial base. The market for specialized engineering support to government agencies, particularly the Department of Defense, is substantial. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to ascertain without detailed task order information, but engineering services are a consistent area of federal expenditure, often driven by complex technological requirements and ongoing modernization efforts.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, and the 'sb' flag is false. This indicates that small businesses were not specifically targeted for this procurement. While MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. may utilize small business subcontractors, there is no explicit requirement for it based on the provided data. The absence of a set-aside means the primary competition was not limited to small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Navy, specifically within the NSWCCDD. Accountability measures are typically embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed task-order specifics may be less accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Contracts
Defense Engineering Services
Naval Warfare Center Contracts
Cost-Plus Contracts
Delivery Orders

Risk Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type carries inherent cost overrun risk.
Limited public detail on specific engineering tasks hinders granular value assessment.
Competition level (3 bidders) is moderate; actual competitiveness depends on proposal quality.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $5.4 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.. ENGINEERING AND MARINE SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE NSWCCDD MISSION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-05-30. End: 2026-08-19.

What is the track record of MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. with the Department of Defense?

MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. has a history of contracting with the Department of Defense. While specific details of past performance on similar contracts are not provided in this data snippet, their presence as a bidder and awardee suggests they possess the necessary qualifications and experience to compete for and execute defense-related engineering services. A deeper dive into their contract history, including past performance reviews and any reported issues, would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their reliability and effectiveness in fulfilling government requirements.

How does the $5.4 million award compare to similar engineering support contracts for naval missions?

Benchmarking this $5.4 million award against similar contracts requires access to a broader dataset of naval engineering support procurements. Factors such as the specific scope of work, duration, contract type (CPFF in this case), and the complexity of the mission supported by NSWCCDD are crucial for comparison. Without these details, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents a high, low, or average value. However, the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure warrants careful monitoring to ensure costs align with the value delivered, as this contract type can be susceptible to cost growth if not managed diligently.

What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for engineering services?

The primary risk with a CPFF contract is the potential for cost overruns. While the contractor's profit is fixed, they are reimbursed for actual costs incurred. If costs escalate beyond initial estimates due to unforeseen complexities, scope creep, or inefficient management, the total contract value can increase significantly. For the government, this means potentially paying more than initially budgeted. Effective risk mitigation requires robust government oversight, detailed cost tracking, clear definition of the Statement of Work (SOW), and proactive management of any changes to prevent uncontrolled cost escalation.

How does the 'full and open competition' impact price discovery and potential savings for taxpayers?

Full and open competition is designed to maximize the number of potential bidders, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive proposals. This process generally leads to better price discovery, as multiple companies vie for the contract, often driving down prices to a more market-based level. For taxpayers, this translates to a higher probability of obtaining services at a fair and reasonable price, potentially yielding significant savings compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios. The presence of 3 bidders in this case suggests a degree of competition, which is favorable for price discovery.

What is the significance of this contract being a 'delivery order'?

The designation of this award as a 'delivery order' indicates that it is a task or order placed against a larger, pre-existing contract vehicle, often a Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. This approach allows agencies to procure goods or services more efficiently once the foundational contract has been established through a competitive process. For taxpayers, this can mean faster procurement timelines and potentially better pricing due to the pre-negotiated terms of the base contract. It suggests that the Department of the Navy has established a framework contract for engineering services, and this is one specific task being executed under it.

What are the implications of the contract not being a small business set-aside?

The absence of a small business set-aside means that the competition for this contract was not restricted to small businesses. This allows large businesses, as well as small businesses, to compete. While this can lead to a broader pool of potential bidders and potentially more diverse capabilities, it also means that opportunities specifically carved out to support the small business industrial base are not present in this particular procurement. The government's overall small business goals would need to be met through other contract actions.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N0016724R3007

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Mantech International Corporation

Address: 2251 CORPORATE PARK DR STE 600, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $80,412,314

Exercised Options: $15,395,968

Current Obligation: $5,406,420

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017819D8070

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline