Treasury's $14.4M administrative consulting contract awarded to Amentum National Security Programs, Inc. in 2005

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,430,836 ($14.4M)

Contractor: Amentum National Security Programs, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury

Start Date: 2005-05-01

End Date: 2005-12-31

Contract Duration: 244 days

Daily Burn Rate: $59.1K/day

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: BREA, ORANGE County, CALIFORNIA, 92821

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Treasury obligated $14.4 million to AMENTUM NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS, INC for work described as: ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES Key points: 1. The contract value of $14.4 million for administrative management and general management consulting services represents a significant investment in specialized expertise. 2. Awarded in 2005, the contract's duration of 244 days suggests a focused, project-based engagement rather than long-term support. 3. The fixed-price contract type indicates a clear scope and budget, transferring some risk to the contractor. 4. The absence of small business set-aside flags suggests the primary contractor was not a small business, and subcontracting opportunities may be limited. 5. The contract falls under the 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' NAICS code, a common area for federal agency support. 6. The award to Amentum National Security Programs, Inc. points to a specific capability set sought by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service. 7. The contract's completion in 2005 means current relevance would depend on follow-on actions or similar ongoing needs.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more context on the specific services rendered and the prevailing market rates in 2005. The $14.4 million price tag for administrative consulting services over approximately eight months suggests a substantial engagement. However, without comparable contracts for similar scope and duration, it's difficult to definitively assess if this represented excellent value for money. The fixed-price nature implies a negotiated ceiling, but the actual cost-effectiveness hinges on the contractor's efficiency and the achieved outcomes.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The provided data does not specify the competition level for this contract. It is unclear whether it was a full and open competition, a limited competition, or a sole-source award. The number of bidders, if any, is not detailed. The method of procurement significantly impacts price discovery and the potential for achieving the best value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The level of competition directly influences taxpayer value. Robust competition typically drives down prices and encourages innovation, leading to more efficient use of public funds. Limited or sole-source awards may result in higher costs if competitive pressures are absent.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries of this contract were likely the Department of the Treasury, specifically the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, through enhanced administrative and management capabilities. The services delivered were focused on administrative management and general management consulting, aiming to improve operational efficiency and strategic planning within the agency. The geographic impact was primarily within the agency's operational locations, likely concentrated in areas where the Bureau of the Fiscal Service is headquartered or has significant operations. Workforce implications would involve the utilization of specialized consulting expertise, potentially augmenting or advising existing government personnel on management practices.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of transparency regarding the competition method makes it difficult to assess if taxpayers received the best possible value.
The contract's age (awarded in 2005) limits its direct relevance to current spending patterns and market conditions.
Without details on performance metrics or outcomes, it's hard to gauge the effectiveness of the consulting services provided.
The absence of small business participation information raises questions about opportunities for smaller firms in supporting this contract.

Positive Signals

The use of a Firm Fixed Price contract type suggests a defined scope and budget, providing cost certainty for the government.
Awarding the contract to Amentum National Security Programs, Inc. indicates the selection of a contractor with perceived expertise in administrative and management consulting.
The contract duration of 244 days implies a focused effort, potentially leading to timely completion of specific objectives.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the administrative and management consulting services sector, a broad category encompassing strategic planning, organizational efficiency, and operational improvement. Federal agencies frequently procure these services to enhance their internal functions. The market for such services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise. The $14.4 million value, while substantial, is within the range of large consulting engagements for federal clients. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large federal contracts for similar management consulting services across various agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the primary award was made to a large business, Amentum National Security Programs, Inc. Consequently, opportunities for small businesses would likely be limited to subcontracting roles, if any were mandated or pursued by the prime contractor. The impact on the small business ecosystem is minimal unless significant subcontracting occurred, which is not indicated.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight mechanisms for this contract would typically involve contract officers, program managers within the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, and potentially agency-level oversight bodies. Accountability measures would be tied to the terms of the Firm Fixed Price contract, focusing on deliverables and adherence to scope. Transparency assessment is limited by the available data; details on the procurement process and performance outcomes are not publicly detailed. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Management and Financial Consulting, Acquisition and Commercialization Services
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Risk Flags

Lack of competition details
Limited performance outcome data
Contract awarded in 2005, potentially outdated context

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Treasury awarded $14.4 million to AMENTUM NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS, INC. ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AMENTUM NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (Bureau of the Fiscal Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-05-01. End: 2005-12-31.

What specific administrative and management consulting services were provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' under NAICS code 541611. However, the specific nature of these services is not detailed. Typically, such contracts could encompass areas like strategic planning, organizational design, process improvement, performance management, human capital strategy, and financial management consulting. Without further documentation, the precise scope of work, deliverables, and objectives remains unspecified. This lack of detail makes it difficult to fully assess the contract's impact or value.

How does the $14.4 million contract value compare to similar federal consulting contracts awarded around 2005?

Comparing the $14.4 million contract value from 2005 requires access to historical federal procurement data and market analysis from that period. General trends suggest that large-scale consulting engagements for federal agencies could range from several million to tens of millions of dollars, depending on the scope, duration, and complexity. Without specific benchmarks for 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' in 2005, it's challenging to definitively state if $14.4 million was high, low, or average. Factors like the specific agency, the criticality of the services, and the number of bidders would influence pricing.

What was the procurement process for this contract, and how many bids were received?

The provided data does not specify the procurement process used for this contract, nor does it indicate the number of bids received. The contract type is listed as 'FIRM FIXED PRICE' (pt: 'FIRM FIXED PRICE'), and the award was made to 'AMENTUM NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS, INC' (co: 'AMENTUM NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS, INC'). However, the method of solicitation (e.g., full and open competition, sole source, limited competition) is not detailed. Understanding the procurement history is crucial for assessing the level of competition and its potential impact on the final price and value obtained by the government.

What were the key performance indicators or outcomes achieved by Amentum National Security Programs, Inc. under this contract?

The available data does not include information on the key performance indicators (KPIs) or specific outcomes achieved by Amentum National Security Programs, Inc. for this contract. Contracts for consulting services typically include performance standards and deliverables that are evaluated upon completion. Without access to performance reports, contract close-out documentation, or agency assessments, it is impossible to determine the effectiveness of the services rendered or whether the contract met its intended objectives. This lack of performance data limits a thorough evaluation of the contract's success.

What is the historical spending pattern for administrative management and general management consulting services by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service or the Department of the Treasury?

The provided data only pertains to a single contract awarded in 2005. To establish historical spending patterns for administrative management and general management consulting services by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service or the Department of the Treasury, a comprehensive analysis of procurement data over multiple fiscal years would be necessary. This would involve identifying all contracts awarded under relevant NAICS codes (like 541611) to these entities. Such an analysis would reveal trends in spending levels, common contractors, types of services procured, and average contract values, providing context for the $14.4 million award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM (UEI: 153561212)

Address: 6564 LOISDALE CT STE 900, SPRINGFIELD, VA, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,430,836

Exercised Options: $14,430,836

Current Obligation: $14,430,836

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: BPA4027

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline