NASA's $28.2M Blanket Purchase Agreement with Leidos, Inc. for Technical Services Faced Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $28,202,725 ($28.2M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2002-06-27
End Date: 2008-12-31
Contract Duration: 2,379 days
Daily Burn Rate: $11.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS
Sector: Other
Official Description: BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR GSA SCHEDULE CONTRACT
Place of Performance
Location: CLEVELAND, CUYAHOGA County, OHIO, 44135
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $28.2 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR GSA SCHEDULE CONTRACT Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Leidos, Inc. for $28.2 million represents a significant investment in professional, scientific, and technical services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a robust market for these services and potential for competitive pricing. 3. The duration of the contract (2002-2008) indicates a long-term need for these services by NASA. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541990 covers 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services,' a broad category.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award amount of $28.2 million over six years suggests a substantial but potentially reasonable annual spend for comprehensive technical services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale, long-term government contracts for broad technical support is necessary for a definitive value assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method is generally expected to yield competitive pricing and ensure the government receives the best value, though specific pricing details are not provided.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is a positive for taxpayers, as it promotes market efficiency and aims to secure services at competitive rates, maximizing the value of federal dollars spent.
Public Impact
NASA's reliance on external contractors for specialized technical services highlights the need for efficient procurement processes. The broad scope of 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' can encompass a wide range of critical support functions for agency operations. Long-term agreements like this can provide stability for contractors while ensuring consistent support for government missions.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics or outcomes in the provided data.
- Broad NAICS code may obscure the exact nature and cost-effectiveness of services rendered.
- Contract duration could lead to potential for cost creep if not actively managed.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process.
- Significant contract value suggests a critical need for the services provided.
- Long contract duration implies a stable, ongoing relationship beneficial for service continuity.
Sector Analysis
The professional, scientific, and technical services sector is a significant area of federal spending, supporting a wide array of agency functions. Benchmarks for this sector vary widely based on the specific services, but large, multi-year contracts like this are common for complex support needs.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further investigation would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The use of a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) on a GSA Schedule contract implies that some level of oversight and adherence to GSA regulations is in place. However, the effectiveness of oversight depends on NASA's internal controls and performance monitoring.
Related Government Programs
- All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of specific service details.
- Absence of performance metrics.
- Limited insight into competitive bidding outcomes.
- No information on contract modifications or disputes.
- Potential for cost overruns in long-term contracts if not managed diligently.
Tags
all-other-professional-scientific-and-te, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, oh, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $28.2 million to LEIDOS, INC.. BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR GSA SCHEDULE CONTRACT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $28.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2002-06-27. End: 2008-12-31.
What specific technical services were provided under this BPA, and how did they align with NASA's mission objectives?
The provided data categorizes the services under NAICS code 541990, 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services.' This broad classification lacks specificity. To assess alignment, a detailed breakdown of the tasks performed, deliverables, and their direct contribution to NASA's scientific research, space exploration, or aeronautical development programs would be required.
Given the full and open competition, what was the range of bids received, and how did Leidos, Inc.'s proposal compare in terms of cost and technical merit?
The data confirms full and open competition but does not provide bid ranges or comparative analysis of proposals. Understanding the competitive landscape requires access to bid data, including the number of offers received and the evaluation criteria used by NASA to select Leidos, Inc. This information is crucial for verifying that the selected offer represented the best value.
How was the performance of Leidos, Inc. monitored throughout the contract's duration, and were there any performance issues or contract modifications?
The provided data does not include details on performance monitoring, quality assurance, or any contract modifications. Assessing effectiveness necessitates reviewing performance reports, contractor evaluations, and any contract actions taken during the 2002-2008 period to ensure services met requirements and taxpayer funds were used appropriately.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)
Address: 6310 ALLENTOWN BOULEVARD, HARRISBURG, PA, 10
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $28,234,231
Exercised Options: $28,234,231
Current Obligation: $28,202,725
Timeline
Start Date: 2002-06-27
Current End Date: 2008-12-31
Potential End Date: 2008-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2009-06-05
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →