DHS FEMA awards $24.15M for Emergency Response Program Management Consultants
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $24,151,073 ($24.2M)
Contractor: Emergency Response Program Management Consultants
Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security
Start Date: 2008-10-14
End Date: 2014-04-23
Contract Duration: 2,017 days
Daily Burn Rate: $12.0K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: PA TAC
Place of Performance
Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22201
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Homeland Security obligated $24.2 million to EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS for work described as: PA TAC Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $24.15 million over six years. 2. Engineering Services (NAICS 541330) is a broad category with many potential competitors. 3. Risk of cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing structure. 4. Contract awarded to a single vendor, raising questions about competition. 5. Sector: Government Services/Consulting.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract's Time and Materials pricing structure, combined with its duration, raises concerns about potential cost overruns and the government's ability to control expenses. Benchmarking against similar contracts is difficult without more specific service details.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
Awarded as a competitive delivery order, but the data suggests it was likely limited to a pre-selected pool of vendors. The lack of a full and open competition may have restricted price discovery and potentially led to a higher overall cost.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may have paid more than necessary due to limited competition and a flexible pricing model.
Public Impact
Ensures continuity of essential emergency response program management services for FEMA. Supports federal efforts in disaster preparedness and response. Potential for funds to be used inefficiently due to contract structure.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Time and Materials pricing
- Limited competition
- Long contract duration
Positive Signals
- Supports critical government function
- Awarded under a competitive process (though potentially limited)
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically engineering and management consulting for government agencies. Spending in this area is substantial, with agencies often relying on external expertise for specialized program management.
Small Business Impact
No indication of small business participation is provided in the data. The nature of the services may lend itself to larger, specialized firms.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract's duration and pricing structure warrant close oversight to ensure efficient use of taxpayer funds and adherence to program objectives.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Homeland Security Contracting
- Federal Emergency Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing.
- Limited competition may have resulted in higher costs.
- Lack of transparency on specific services provided.
- No clear indication of small business utilization.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-homeland-security, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Homeland Security awarded $24.2 million to EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS. PA TAC
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Federal Emergency Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $24.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-10-14. End: 2014-04-23.
What specific program management services were provided, and how did they directly contribute to FEMA's mission effectiveness?
The data does not specify the exact program management services rendered. To assess effectiveness, one would need to review performance reports and evaluate the contractor's contribution to specific FEMA initiatives, such as disaster relief coordination, resource allocation, or policy development. Without this granular detail, the direct impact remains unclear.
How was the 'limited' competition structured, and what steps were taken to ensure fair pricing despite the Time and Materials model?
The data indicates a 'competitive delivery order' but lacks details on the specific solicitation process. To ensure fair pricing, FEMA should have established clear labor categories, hourly rates, and ceilings, potentially referencing government-wide contract vehicles or conducting market research. Regular audits and performance reviews would also be crucial to monitor costs.
What is the benchmark cost for similar emergency response program management consulting services, and how does this contract's total value compare?
Benchmarking is challenging without specific service details and contract terms. However, a $24.15 million award over six years for program management consulting suggests a significant investment. A thorough analysis would require comparing the contractor's hourly rates and total expenditure against industry standards and other government contracts for comparable services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: AECOM
Address: 3101 WILSON BOULEVARD, ARLINGTON, VA, 22201
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $82,616,318
Exercised Options: $82,616,318
Current Obligation: $24,151,073
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: HSFEHQ06D0488
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-10-14
Current End Date: 2014-04-23
Potential End Date: 2014-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-12-11
More Contracts from Emergency Response Program Management Consultants
- Technical Assistance — $198.8M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Public Assistance/Technical Assistance Dr-1763-Ia — $84.1M (Department of Homeland Security)
- PA TAC — $19.4M (Department of Homeland Security)
- THE Purpose of This Unilateral Modification IS to ADD Eddie Murphy AS the Cotr — $19.3M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Technical Assistance — $18.2M (Department of Homeland Security)
View all Emergency Response Program Management Consultants federal contracts →
Other Department of Homeland Security Contracts
- THE United States Coast Guard HAS a Requirement to Procure UP to Twenty-Six (26) Fast Response Cutters (frcs) on a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Basis With an Economic Price Adjustment (EPA). Phase II of the FRC Program Will Complete the Fleet for a Total of 58 Cutters — $2.1B (Bollinger Shipyards Lockport, L.L.C.)
- Design and Construct NEW Vertical Barrier and Power Distribution, Lighting, Cameras, Equipment Shelters and Linear Ground Detection System (lgds) in Hildago County, NM — $1.8B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Production&delivery of National Security Cutter (NSC) 6 — $1.7B (Huntington Ingalls Incorporated)
- YUM-2 Vertical Border and Waterborne Barrier Construction — $1.7B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Construct Vertical Border Barrier — $1.6B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)