DHS awards $18.2M for Technical Assistance to FEMA, spanning 2006-2012
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $18,236,977 ($18.2M)
Contractor: Emergency Response Program Management Consultants
Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security
Start Date: 2006-06-27
End Date: 2012-01-31
Contract Duration: 2,044 days
Daily Burn Rate: $8.9K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
Place of Performance
Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22201
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Homeland Security obligated $18.2 million to EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS for work described as: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Key points: 1. The contract focused on emergency response program management consultants. 2. This was a competitive delivery order, indicating some level of market engagement. 3. The contract duration was substantial at 2044 days. 4. The award type was Time and Materials, which can pose cost control challenges.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The Time and Materials contract type, coupled with a long duration, suggests potential for cost overruns if not closely managed. The benchmark of $8,922 (likely a daily rate or similar metric) needs further context against specific skill sets and market rates for emergency response program management consultants.
Cost Per Unit: $8,922
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
This was a competitive delivery order, suggesting that multiple vendors were considered. However, the specific details of the competition (e.g., number of bids, evaluation criteria) are not provided, making it difficult to fully assess price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: While competitive, the Time and Materials contract type and long duration may have led to higher costs than a fixed-price contract, impacting taxpayer value.
Public Impact
Ensured continuity of critical emergency response program management services for FEMA. Supported the Department of Homeland Security's mission during a significant period. Provided specialized consulting expertise for complex disaster response scenarios.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Time and Materials contract type
- Long contract duration
- Lack of specific competition details
Positive Signals
- Competitive award
- Supported critical agency mission
Sector Analysis
Engineering Services (NAICS 541330) is a broad category. This specific contract falls under consulting for emergency response program management, which is a specialized niche within engineering services. Benchmarks for this specific niche are hard to ascertain without more detail.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this was not awarded to a small business (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought or achieved through subcontracting.
Oversight & Accountability
The competitive delivery order structure implies some level of oversight in selecting the vendor. However, the long duration and T&M nature necessitate robust monitoring to ensure cost-effectiveness and performance.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Homeland Security Contracting
- Federal Emergency Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract.
- Long contract duration may indicate scope creep or lack of defined requirements.
- Limited transparency on the specifics of the competitive process.
- Lack of explicit small business participation data.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-homeland-security, va, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Homeland Security awarded $18.2 million to EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Federal Emergency Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $18.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-06-27. End: 2012-01-31.
What was the specific scope of work for the 'Technical Assistance' and how did it align with FEMA's core emergency response functions?
The 'Technical Assistance' likely encompassed a range of consulting services aimed at enhancing FEMA's capabilities in managing emergency response programs. This could include strategic planning, process improvement, operational support, and policy development. The alignment would be crucial for ensuring that the contracted services directly contributed to FEMA's mission effectiveness during crises and preparedness efforts.
How did the 'competitive delivery order' process ensure optimal pricing and vendor selection for these specialized services?
A competitive delivery order implies that multiple vendors were solicited and evaluated, providing a basis for price comparison and selection. However, the effectiveness of price discovery depends on the number of bids received, the clarity of the solicitation, and the evaluation criteria used. Without these details, it's difficult to definitively state if optimal pricing was achieved, especially given the Time and Materials contract type.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how was performance measured to ensure value for taxpayer money?
Key performance indicators would likely have focused on the successful delivery of consulting services, adherence to project timelines, and the quality of recommendations provided. Performance measurement would involve regular reviews of deliverables, client feedback from FEMA, and potentially cost-variance analysis given the T&M structure. Ensuring value requires diligent oversight to confirm that the assistance provided demonstrably improved FEMA's emergency response capabilities.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: AECOM (UEI: 153561212)
Address: 3101 WILSON BOULEVARD, ARLINGTON, VA, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $18,236,977
Exercised Options: $18,236,977
Current Obligation: $18,236,977
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: HSFEHQ06D0488
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-06-27
Current End Date: 2012-01-31
Potential End Date: 2012-01-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2012-06-19
More Contracts from Emergency Response Program Management Consultants
- Technical Assistance — $198.8M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Public Assistance/Technical Assistance Dr-1763-Ia — $84.1M (Department of Homeland Security)
- PA TAC — $24.2M (Department of Homeland Security)
- PA TAC — $19.4M (Department of Homeland Security)
- THE Purpose of This Unilateral Modification IS to ADD Eddie Murphy AS the Cotr — $19.3M (Department of Homeland Security)
View all Emergency Response Program Management Consultants federal contracts →
Other Department of Homeland Security Contracts
- THE United States Coast Guard HAS a Requirement to Procure UP to Twenty-Six (26) Fast Response Cutters (frcs) on a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Basis With an Economic Price Adjustment (EPA). Phase II of the FRC Program Will Complete the Fleet for a Total of 58 Cutters — $2.1B (Bollinger Shipyards Lockport, L.L.C.)
- Design and Construct NEW Vertical Barrier and Power Distribution, Lighting, Cameras, Equipment Shelters and Linear Ground Detection System (lgds) in Hildago County, NM — $1.8B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Production&delivery of National Security Cutter (NSC) 6 — $1.7B (Huntington Ingalls Incorporated)
- YUM-2 Vertical Border and Waterborne Barrier Construction — $1.7B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Construct Vertical Border Barrier — $1.6B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)