DHS awards $19.2M for emergency response program management, with a single delivery order

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,260,825 ($19.3M)

Contractor: Emergency Response Program Management Consultants

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2011-06-09

End Date: 2013-03-31

Contract Duration: 661 days

Daily Burn Rate: $29.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS UNILATERAL MODIFICATION IS TO ADD EDDIE MURPHY AS THE COTR

Place of Performance

Location: COLUMBIA, BOONE County, MISSOURI, 65201

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $19.3 million to EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS for work described as: THE PURPOSE OF THIS UNILATERAL MODIFICATION IS TO ADD EDDIE MURPHY AS THE COTR Key points: 1. Contract value of $19.2M for program management services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating broad market engagement. 3. Delivery order structure suggests a specific, time-bound need. 4. Contract duration of 661 days. 5. Services provided under a Time and Materials pricing model. 6. Contractor is responsible for program management consulting.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $19.2 million for program management consulting over approximately two years appears within a reasonable range for specialized federal support. However, without specific benchmarks for 'emergency response program management consultants' or details on the scope of work, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The Time and Materials pricing model can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely managed, which warrants attention.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This approach typically fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service quality. The presence of 4 bids indicates a moderate level of competition for this specific requirement.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging a wider pool of contractors to offer their services, potentially driving down costs and improving the quality of services received.

Public Impact

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) benefits from enhanced program management capabilities. Services support the critical function of emergency response program management. Geographic impact is likely national, given FEMA's mandate. Workforce implications include the engagement of specialized consultants.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials pricing can lead to unpredictable costs if not managed diligently.
The specific nature of 'emergency response program management' requires careful definition of deliverables to ensure value.
Limited information on the contractor's specific track record in this niche area.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
The contract addresses a critical government function: emergency response.
The modification adding a COTR indicates active oversight and management.

Sector Analysis

The Engineering Services (NAICS 541330) sector encompasses a wide range of professional services. Federal spending in this area often supports infrastructure, defense, and public safety initiatives. This contract, focused on program management for emergency response, fits within the broader professional services segment that supports government operations, particularly in areas requiring specialized expertise and project oversight.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside or subcontracting requirements for this contract. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is not discernible from this information alone.

Oversight & Accountability

The modification adding Eddie Murphy as the COTR (Contracting Officer's Technical Representative) signifies an active oversight mechanism. This role is crucial for monitoring contractor performance, ensuring adherence to contract terms, and managing technical aspects of the work. Further details on specific reporting requirements or performance evaluations would be needed for a comprehensive transparency assessment.

Related Government Programs

FEMA Disaster Relief Fund
Homeland Security Grants Program
Federal Preparedness Grants

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing model.
Lack of detailed scope of work information.
Limited public information on contractor's specific past performance in this niche.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $19.3 million to EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS. THE PURPOSE OF THIS UNILATERAL MODIFICATION IS TO ADD EDDIE MURPHY AS THE COTR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Federal Emergency Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-06-09. End: 2013-03-31.

What is the specific scope of work for 'emergency response program management consultants' under this contract?

The provided data does not detail the specific scope of work. 'Emergency response program management consultants' typically assist government agencies in planning, organizing, directing, and controlling resources for emergency preparedness, response, and recovery efforts. This can include developing strategic plans, managing complex projects, advising on policy, and ensuring operational readiness. Without a detailed statement of work, it is difficult to ascertain the precise services rendered and their alignment with FEMA's needs.

How does the $19.2 million contract value compare to similar emergency response program management contracts awarded by FEMA or DHS?

Benchmarking this $19.2 million contract requires access to a database of similar contracts. However, for a contract spanning approximately 22 months (from June 2011 to March 2013), this value suggests a significant engagement. Federal contracts for program management and consulting can range widely based on complexity, duration, and required expertise. Without comparative data, it's challenging to definitively state if this represents a high, low, or average investment for the services provided.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate the contractor's performance in managing emergency response programs?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, for program management consulting, KPIs might include adherence to project timelines, budget management, quality of deliverables (e.g., plans, reports), effectiveness of recommendations, and stakeholder satisfaction. The designation of a COTR suggests that performance monitoring is in place, but the specific metrics are not detailed in the available information.

What is the track record of the contractor in providing emergency response program management services to the federal government?

The provided data does not include information on the contractor's specific track record. To assess this, one would need to research the contractor's past performance on similar federal contracts, including client feedback, any past performance evaluations, and their history with agencies like FEMA or DHS. A strong track record in managing complex emergency response programs would be a positive indicator for this contract's success.

What is the potential risk associated with using a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for emergency response program management?

The primary risk associated with Time and Materials (T&M) contracts, especially for program management, is the potential for cost escalation if not managed rigorously. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M contracts reimburse the contractor for direct labor hours and costs, plus a fee. If the scope of work is not clearly defined or if project inefficiencies arise, costs can exceed initial estimates. For emergency response, where situations can be dynamic, T&M can offer flexibility, but it necessitates strong government oversight to control expenditures and ensure value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM

Address: 3101 WILSON BOULEVARD, ARLINGTON, VA, 22201

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $40,639,488

Exercised Options: $40,639,488

Current Obligation: $19,260,825

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HSFEHQ06D0488

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline