DoD's $21.5M Facilities Support Services Contract Awarded to DynCorp International LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,514,682 ($21.5M)

Contractor: Dyncorp International LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2019-02-17

End Date: 2022-02-16

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $19.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: BASE OPERATING SERVICES AT SAUDI

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $21.5 million to DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC for work described as: BASE OPERATING SERVICES AT SAUDI Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust market. 2. The contract duration of 1095 days (3 years) provides a stable period for service delivery. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. 4. The award value of over $21.5 million indicates a significant scope of services. 5. Services fall under Facilities Support, a critical operational category for the DoD. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized, potentially limiting direct participation for smaller firms.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $21.5 million for three years of base operating services appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities support contracts for Department of Defense installations is necessary for a definitive value assessment. However, the firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty, which is a positive indicator for value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters competitive pricing and encourages a wider range of solutions. The government likely received proposals from several experienced contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically drives down prices through market forces and ensures the government obtains services at the most competitive rates available.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense benefits from the continuity of essential base operating services. Personnel and equipment are supported through facilities maintenance, logistics, and other support functions. The geographic impact is concentrated at the specific DoD installation(s) where services are rendered. The contract supports a workforce of individuals employed by DynCorp International LLC in providing these services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess service quality.
Potential for vendor lock-in if follow-on contracts are not competitively procured.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical base operations could pose a risk if performance degrades.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract type limits the government's exposure to cost increases.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive environment that should drive efficiency.
Long-term contract duration (3 years) allows for stable service provision and planning.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services, categorized under NAICS code 561210, represent a significant segment of the government contracting market. This sector encompasses a wide range of services essential for the operation and maintenance of government facilities. Spending in this area is often substantial due to the scale and criticality of government infrastructure. Comparable contracts often involve extensive logistical, maintenance, and operational support for military bases and other federal installations.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting goals for small businesses mentioned. This suggests that the primary award went to a large business, and opportunities for small businesses would likely be through subcontracting directly with DynCorp International LLC, if they choose to engage them.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Air Force contracting office. Performance monitoring, quality assurance surveillance plans (QASPs), and regular reviews are standard mechanisms to ensure contractor compliance and service delivery. The contract's adherence to terms and conditions, including financial reporting and operational standards, would be subject to government oversight.

Related Government Programs

Base Operating Support Services
Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Logistics and Support Services
Department of Defense Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Performance Risk
Contract Management Risk
Cost Control Risk (for contractor)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $21.5 million to DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC. BASE OPERATING SERVICES AT SAUDI

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2019-02-17. End: 2022-02-16.

What is the historical performance record of DynCorp International LLC on similar government contracts?

DynCorp International LLC has a long history of performing government contracts, particularly in areas of logistics, aviation, and base support services for various agencies, including the Department of Defense. Their track record includes significant contracts for base operations support in overseas locations and domestic facilities. While specific performance ratings for this particular contract are not detailed here, DynCorp's extensive experience suggests a capacity to handle large-scale service requirements. However, like many large contractors, they have faced scrutiny and performance reviews on various contracts over the years. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance information repositories (like CPARS) for this specific award and other comparable contracts to identify trends in quality, timeliness, and cost control.

How does the per-unit cost of these facilities support services compare to industry benchmarks?

Determining a precise per-unit cost benchmark for these facilities support services is challenging without a detailed breakdown of the specific services rendered (e.g., per square foot maintained, per man-hour of labor, per type of maintenance performed). The total contract value of $21.5 million over three years averages to approximately $7.17 million per year. Facilities support encompasses a broad range of activities, from janitorial services and grounds maintenance to complex infrastructure repair and security. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare the cost of specific service lines against industry standards for similar government or commercial facilities of comparable size and complexity. Given the firm fixed-price nature, the government has a defined cost, but the value derived depends on the efficiency and effectiveness of DynCorp's service delivery relative to market rates for each component service.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks for this contract include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor, leading to disruptions in base operations; cost overruns if the firm fixed-price contract is poorly managed by the contractor; and potential security vulnerabilities if services are not performed to standard. Mitigation strategies employed by the government include the firm fixed-price contract type, which shifts cost-overrun risk to the contractor. Robust oversight by the contracting officer and quality assurance personnel is crucial for monitoring performance and identifying issues early. The contract duration also allows for a stable operational environment, but requires diligent management throughout its term. Furthermore, the full and open competition process aims to select a contractor with a proven ability to manage such complex operations effectively.

What is the historical spending trend for Base Operating Services at this specific Department of Defense agency?

Historical spending data for Base Operating Services (BOS) at the Department of the Air Force, and specifically for facilities support, would reveal trends in demand and investment in maintaining operational readiness. Without access to specific historical databases for this agency, a general observation is that spending on BOS is often substantial and relatively stable, reflecting the ongoing need to maintain military installations. Fluctuations might occur due to base realignments, new construction projects, or shifts in defense priorities. The $21.5 million awarded here represents a significant, but potentially typical, investment for a multi-year facilities support contract. Analyzing prior years' spending on similar contracts would provide context on whether this award represents an increase, decrease, or steady level of investment in these critical support functions.

How does the competition level (full and open) impact the overall value proposition for the taxpayer?

A full and open competition process generally enhances the value proposition for taxpayers. By allowing any qualified vendor to submit a bid, the government maximizes the pool of potential offerors, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive pricing. This competitive pressure incentivizes bidders to offer their best terms and pricing to win the contract. While the specific number of bidders isn't provided, the process itself suggests that multiple companies vied for this $21.5 million contract. This competitive dynamic helps ensure that taxpayer funds are used efficiently, securing necessary facilities support services at rates that reflect market conditions rather than being inflated due to limited competition or sole-source arrangements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: PAE Government Services Inc.

Address: 13500 HERITAGE PKWY, FORT WORTH, TX, 76177

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,187,982

Exercised Options: $22,187,982

Current Obligation: $21,514,682

Actual Outlays: $4,175,292

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA805115D0008

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline