State Department Awards $865M to DynCorp for Iraq Justice Program Support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $864,995,761 ($865.0M)

Contractor: Dyncorp International LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2008-06-17

End Date: 2013-01-31

Contract Duration: 1,689 days

Daily Burn Rate: $512.1K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)

Sector: Other

Official Description: PROVIDE ADVISORS AND SUPPORT SERVICES (LIFE AND MISSION SUPPORT, SECURITY SERVICES, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) AND COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES) IN SUPPORT OF THE IRAQ CRIMINAL JUSTICE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AS DIRECTED BY THE BUREAU FOR INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AFFAIRS (INL) OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $865.0 million to DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC for work described as: PROVIDE ADVISORS AND SUPPORT SERVICES (LIFE AND MISSION SUPPORT, SECURITY SERVICES, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) AND COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES) IN SUPPORT OF THE IRAQ CRIMINAL JUSTICE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AS DIRECTED BY THE BUREAU FOR INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS AND LAW ENFORCEME… Key points: 1. Significant investment in international program support, focusing on security and IT. 2. DynCorp International LLC is the sole awardee, raising questions about competition. 3. Long contract duration (nearly 5 years) suggests a complex, ongoing need. 4. The award falls under Facilities Support Services, indicating a broad scope of work.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The total award value of $865 million is substantial. Without comparable contracts for similar international program support services, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. However, the scale suggests a need for robust justification.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This appears to be a delivery order under a larger contract, potentially with limited competition if the initial award was not fully competitive. The 'COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER' designation suggests some level of competition, but the specifics of that competition are unclear.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used to support international development programs, which can have long-term benefits but require careful oversight to ensure effectiveness and prevent waste.

Public Impact

Supports critical international law enforcement and justice initiatives in Iraq. Provides essential security, IT, and mission support services. Contributes to stability and rule of law in a complex geopolitical region. Funds are allocated to a private contractor for service delivery.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Limited competition concerns
  • High contract value
  • Long performance period

Positive Signals

  • Supports critical international program
  • Addresses security and IT needs

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Facilities Support Services, a broad category. The spending aligns with government efforts to provide comprehensive support for complex international programs, often involving security, logistics, and technical services. Benchmarks for such extensive international support contracts are difficult to establish due to unique program requirements.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses in this award. Large, complex international support contracts are often awarded to prime contractors who may then subcontract, but the primary awardee here is a large business.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of State is responsible for overseeing this contract. Given the significant value and duration, robust oversight mechanisms are crucial to ensure performance, accountability, and proper use of funds. The 'no' field indicates 3 task orders were issued, suggesting active management.

Related Government Programs

  • Facilities Support Services
  • Department of State Contracting
  • Department of State Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for limited competition
  • High contract value requires scrutiny
  • Long duration may indicate evolving needs or lack of flexibility
  • Complexity of international program support
  • Reliance on a single contractor for critical services

Tags

facilities-support-services, department-of-state, delivery-order, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $865.0 million to DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC. PROVIDE ADVISORS AND SUPPORT SERVICES (LIFE AND MISSION SUPPORT, SECURITY SERVICES, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) AND COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES) IN SUPPORT OF THE IRAQ CRIMINAL JUSTICE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AS DIRECTED BY THE BUREAU FOR INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AFFAIRS (INL) OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $865.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-06-17. End: 2013-01-31.

What was the specific competitive process for the original contract under which this delivery order was issued, and how did it ensure fair pricing?

The designation 'COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER' implies some form of competition occurred for this specific order. However, the nature of that competition (e.g., number of bidders, evaluation criteria) is not detailed. Understanding the original contract's competitive history is crucial to assess if fair market prices were established and if the government received the best value.

How is the effectiveness of DynCorp's services in supporting the Iraq Criminal Justice Development Program being measured and verified?

Measuring the effectiveness of services like life and mission support, security, and IT in a complex program like Iraq's criminal justice development requires clear performance metrics and regular evaluations. The Department of State must have established key performance indicators (KPIs) and a system for tracking DynCorp's progress against these metrics to ensure taxpayer funds are achieving desired outcomes.

What is the breakdown of costs within this $865 million award, and are there specific cost-saving measures or efficiencies being implemented?

A detailed cost breakdown would reveal how funds are allocated across different service categories (security, IT, etc.). Without this, it's hard to assess value. The government should be actively seeking efficiencies and cost-saving opportunities throughout the contract's life, especially given its substantial value and duration, to maximize the impact of taxpayer investment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (2)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. (UEI: 014784388)

Address: 6500 WEST FREEWAY, SUITE 600, FORT WORTH, TX, 76116

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $865,009,355

Exercised Options: $865,009,355

Current Obligation: $864,995,761

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: SLMAQM04C0030

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-06-17

Current End Date: 2013-01-31

Potential End Date: 2013-01-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2019-01-29

More Contracts from Dyncorp International LLC

View all Dyncorp International LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of State Contracts

View all Department of State contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending