Space Force awards $2.3M contract for deployment execution support to USMAX Corporation
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,330,093 ($2.3M)
Contractor: Usmax Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-02-03
End Date: 2027-02-02
Contract Duration: 729 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: UNITED STATES SPACE FORCE DEPLOYMENT EXECUTION SUPPORT
Place of Performance
Location: COLORADO SPRINGS, EL PASO County, COLORADO, 80914
State: Colorado Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $2.3 million to USMAX CORPORATION for work described as: UNITED STATES SPACE FORCE DEPLOYMENT EXECUTION SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized engineering services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration of two years provides a stable period for service delivery. 4. The contract is a delivery order under a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle. 5. Services are categorized under Engineering Services, a common requirement for defense agencies.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $2.3 million over two years for deployment execution support appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized engineering services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for deployment support within the Department of Defense would provide a more precise assessment. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator of value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters price discovery and encourages competitive pricing. The exclusion of sources clause might suggest specific technical requirements that narrowed the field initially, but the overall award was open.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best possible price and quality through a broad range of potential providers.
Public Impact
The United States Space Force will benefit from enhanced deployment execution support. Services delivered will likely include planning, coordination, and management of space-related deployments. The geographic impact is primarily within the operational areas of the Space Force, potentially global. Workforce implications may involve specialized engineers and project managers.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess effectiveness.
- Details on the exclusion of sources clause are not fully elaborated, raising minor transparency concerns.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process.
- Firm fixed-price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
- Contract duration of two years allows for sustained support.
Sector Analysis
Engineering services are a critical component of the defense sector, supporting complex technological and logistical operations. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise. This contract fits within the broader category of defense support services, which represent a significant portion of federal spending. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar deployment support contracts within the Department of Defense would provide further context.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a primary focus for this specific contract, as the 'ss' (small business set-aside) and 'sb' (small business) flags are false. There is no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this particular award appears limited, though the prime contractor may engage small businesses in their supply chain.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely fall under the purview of the Department of the Air Force, which manages contracts for the Space Force. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and delivery schedules. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though specific performance details may be sensitive. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Space Operations Support Contracts
- Defense Engineering Services
- Military Deployment Logistics
- Aerospace Engineering Services
Risk Flags
- Potential for performance issues if contractor lacks specific expertise.
- Risk of schedule slippage impacting critical deployment timelines.
- Changes in Space Force operational needs could necessitate contract modifications.
Tags
defense, space-force, engineering-services, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, department-of-defense, department-of-the-air-force, usmax-corporation, colorado, medium-value
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $2.3 million to USMAX CORPORATION. UNITED STATES SPACE FORCE DEPLOYMENT EXECUTION SUPPORT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is USMAX CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-02-03. End: 2027-02-02.
What is the track record of USMAX Corporation in performing similar deployment execution support contracts for the Department of Defense or other federal agencies?
A review of USMAX Corporation's contract history would be necessary to fully assess their track record. Publicly available data indicates they have received other federal contracts, primarily within engineering and technical services. Further analysis would involve examining past performance evaluations, any past disputes or contract terminations, and the scale and complexity of previous similar projects they have managed. Understanding their experience with Space Force or Air Force specific deployment requirements would be particularly relevant.
How does the awarded price of $2.3 million compare to market rates for similar deployment execution support services?
Benchmarking the $2.3 million contract value against market rates requires detailed analysis of the specific services rendered. Factors such as the level of expertise required, the duration of the contract (729 days), and the specific deliverables will influence pricing. Comparing this to industry reports on engineering services for defense applications, or analyzing historical data for similar contracts awarded by the DoD, would provide a clearer picture. The firm fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor has estimated these costs and is willing to accept the risk associated with them, which can be a positive sign for value if performance is met.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract?
The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics for this contract. Typically, such contracts would include detailed performance work statements (PWS) outlining measurable objectives related to timeliness, quality of support, adherence to deployment schedules, and effective coordination. Without access to the full contract documentation, it is difficult to assess how performance will be measured and whether the contractor is meeting expectations. These KPIs are crucial for ensuring the government receives the intended value.
What is the historical spending pattern for deployment execution support within the United States Space Force or Department of the Air Force?
Analyzing historical spending patterns for deployment execution support within the Space Force and Department of the Air Force would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and types of services procured. This contract, valued at $2.3 million over two years, represents a specific instance of this spending. A broader analysis would involve aggregating data on similar contracts over the past 5-10 years to identify average contract sizes, common contractors, and fluctuations in demand for these services. Such a pattern analysis can help contextualize the current award and identify potential areas for cost savings or efficiency improvements in future procurements.
What specific risks are associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?
Potential risks for this contract could include contractor performance issues, cost overruns (though mitigated by fixed-price), schedule delays, or changes in mission requirements. The 'exclusion of sources' aspect, while part of a 'full and open' process, might indicate a risk if it unduly limited competition. Mitigation strategies are likely embedded in the contract's performance clauses, reporting requirements, and the government's oversight mechanisms. The two-year duration provides some stability, but the dynamic nature of space operations could introduce unforeseen challenges requiring adaptive management.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 3060 WILLIAMS DR STE 530, FAIRFAX, VA, 22031
Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $6,021,891
Exercised Options: $2,330,093
Current Obligation: $2,330,093
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47QRAD20D1002
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-02-03
Current End Date: 2027-02-02
Potential End Date: 2029-12-02 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-08
More Contracts from Usmax Corporation
- THE General Support Services (GSS) Contract Will Provide Technical, Advisory, and Administrative Support Services for Usaid in Different Areas Under the Bureau for Development, Democracy, and Innovation (DDI) — $27.7M (Agency for International Development)
- Re-Compete of Current Information Assurance (IA) and Configuration Management (CM) Services 13-WY-008 13-WY-009 13-WY-047 — $19.1M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Education & Outreach — $17.5M (Department of Health and Human Services)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)