DoD's $145M Facilities Support Contract with VT Griffin Services Inc. Awarded via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $145,460,971 ($145.5M)
Contractor: VT Griffin Services Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2001-05-16
End Date: 2009-10-31
Contract Duration: 3,090 days
Daily Burn Rate: $47.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Other
Place of Performance
Location: FORT STEWART, LIBERTY County, GEORGIA, 31314
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $145.5 million to VT GRIFFIN SERVICES INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value of $145.5M over 8 years indicates significant long-term investment in facilities support. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to better pricing. 3. The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure incentivizes contractor performance but requires careful oversight. 4. Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) is a broad category, making direct sector benchmarks challenging without further detail.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's Cost Plus Award Fee structure allows for flexibility and performance incentives. Pricing assessment would require detailed analysis of award fee criteria and actual costs incurred versus target.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
Awarded via full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a robust bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers likely benefited from a fair market price for essential facilities support services.
Public Impact
Ensures operational readiness and maintenance of critical facilities for the Department of the Army. Supports a large workforce through essential services, contributing to mission accomplishment. Long-term nature of the contract provides stability for both the government and the contractor. Potential for cost savings through performance incentives under the CPAF structure.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns with CPAF if not managed effectively.
- Scope creep could increase costs beyond initial projections.
- Reliance on a single contractor for essential services poses a risk if performance falters.
Positive Signals
- Competitive award process likely secured favorable pricing.
- Performance incentives in CPAF can drive efficiency.
- Long-term contract provides stability and predictability.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services are crucial for maintaining government infrastructure and operational capabilities. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on the type and scale of facilities managed.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Analysis of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses is not provided.
Oversight & Accountability
The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure necessitates robust government oversight to ensure contractor performance aligns with award criteria and to manage costs effectively. Regular performance reviews are critical.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost control challenges inherent in CPAF contracts.
- Potential for scope creep impacting budget.
- Dependence on contractor performance for critical infrastructure.
- Lack of small business participation noted.
Tags
facilities-support-services, department-of-defense, ga, dca, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $145.5 million to VT GRIFFIN SERVICES INC.. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is VT GRIFFIN SERVICES INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $145.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2001-05-16. End: 2009-10-31.
What specific facilities and services were included in this contract, and how do they align with the Department of the Army's mission requirements?
The contract covered Facilities Support Services, a broad category likely encompassing maintenance, repair, operations, and potentially custodial services for various Army installations. The alignment with mission requirements would depend on the specific facilities supported, such as barracks, administrative buildings, training grounds, or operational infrastructure, ensuring readiness and functionality.
How effectively did the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method ensure optimal value and prevent potential collusion or bid-rigging?
This method, while competitive, requires careful justification for excluding specific sources. Effective implementation relies on transparent solicitation, clear evaluation criteria, and robust monitoring to ensure genuine competition and prevent undue influence, thereby maximizing value and minimizing risks of inflated pricing or compromised quality.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) and award fee criteria used to assess VT Griffin Services Inc.'s performance under the CPAF contract?
The specific KPIs and award fee criteria are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, for facilities support, these might include response times for maintenance requests, quality of repairs, energy efficiency initiatives, safety compliance, and overall customer satisfaction. Effective assessment requires objective metrics and regular performance evaluations.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITY › OPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Babcock International Group PLC (UEI: 503172199)
Address: 5755 DUPREE DR STE 220, ATLANTA, GA, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2001-05-16
Current End Date: 2009-10-31
Potential End Date: 2009-10-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-12-01
More Contracts from VT Griffin Services Inc.
- 200612!700002!1700!n69272!navfac ENG Field ACT Southeast J!N6927200D3170 !A!N! !Y!FB00 !13 !20051101!20050930!042732560!217313865!295489165!N!VT Griffin Services, Inc !5755 Dupree DR NW STE 220 !atlanta !ga!30327!43580!039!13!kings BAY !camden !georgia !+000042710156!n!n!000000000000!s216!facilities Operations Support Services !S1 !services !000 !NOT Discernable !561210!E! !5!C!S!D! !D!20050930!B! ! !A! !a!u!m!2!003!b! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! !1700!N42237!0001! ! — $338.0M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $155.6M (Department of Defense)
- DPW Services, Fort Sill, OK — $139.0M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $93.2M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $43.7M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)