Army Awards $9.58M for Janitorial Services to Professional Contract Services, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,704,957 ($15.7M)

Contractor: Professional Contract Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2002-06-13

End Date: 2007-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,935 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.1K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200209!000756!2100!DA10 !U.S. ARMY MEDICAL COMMAND !DADA1002F0223 !A!N! !N! !20020613!20030331!958473357!958473357!958473357!N!PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SERVICE,!5700 MOPAC EXPRESS SOUTH B!AUSTIN !TX!78749!27370!041!08!FORT CARSON !EL PASO !COLORADO !+000000858624!N!N!000000000000!S201!CUSTODIAL - JANITORIAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !561720!E! !8! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !N!Z!D!U!J!1!001!N!5A!C!N!Z! ! !N!D!N! ! ! ! ! !A!A!* !A!B!N! ! ! ! ! !W51HQT!0001!

Place of Performance

Location: COLORADO SPRINGS, EL PASO County, COLORADO, 80913

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $15.7 million to PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SERVICES, INC. for work described as: 200209!000756!2100!DA10 !U.S. ARMY MEDICAL COMMAND !DADA1002F0223 !A!N! !N! !20020613!20030331!958473357!958473357!958473357!N!PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SERVICE,!5700 MOPAC EXPRESS SOUTH B!AUSTIN !TX!78749!27370!041!08!FORT CARSON !EL PA… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for janitorial services to Professional Contract Services, Inc. 2. The contract value is $9.58 million over approximately 5.3 years. 3. The contract was not competed, raising potential concerns about price discovery. 4. Services are for Fort Carson, Colorado, within the broader Defense sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $9.58 million for janitorial services over 1935 days (approx. 5.3 years) suggests an average annual cost of roughly $1.8 million. Benchmarking this against similar large-scale janitorial contracts would be necessary for a precise assessment, but it appears to be within a reasonable range for extensive facilities.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was listed as 'NOT COMPETED,' indicating a limited competition approach. This method may not have resulted in the most competitive pricing, as potential alternative providers were not solicited. The specific justification for limited competition is not detailed.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of full and open competition may have resulted in a higher price than could have been achieved through a more competitive bidding process, potentially impacting taxpayer value.

Public Impact

Provides essential cleaning and maintenance services for military personnel and facilities at Fort Carson. Supports the operational readiness of the U.S. Army Medical Command by ensuring a sanitary environment. The contract's duration and value indicate a significant commitment of federal funds for facility upkeep.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition
Potential for overpayment due to limited bidding

Positive Signals

Essential service provision
Long-term contract stability

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the 'Services' sector, specifically janitorial and custodial services. Federal spending in this area is consistent across many agencies for maintaining government facilities. Benchmarks for custodial services vary widely based on facility size, type, and location.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses in this contract. The award went to a company identified as 'PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SERVICES, INC.', and further analysis would be needed to determine its small business status.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense, U.S. Army Medical Command. Oversight would typically involve contract officers and quality assurance personnel to ensure services meet specified standards and terms.

Related Government Programs

Janitorial Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Limited competition
Lack of detailed justification for non-competition
Potential for suboptimal pricing
No clear indication of small business participation

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $15.7 million to PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SERVICES, INC.. 200209!000756!2100!DA10 !U.S. ARMY MEDICAL COMMAND !DADA1002F0223 !A!N! !N! !20020613!20030331!958473357!958473357!958473357!N!PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SERVICE,!5700 MOPAC EXPRESS SOUTH B!AUSTIN !TX!78749!27370!041!08!FORT CARSON !EL PASO !COLORADO !+000000858624!N!N!000000000000!S201!CUSTODIAL - JANITORIAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !561720!E! !8! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2002-06-13. End: 2007-09-30.

What was the specific justification for not competing this contract, and what steps were taken to ensure fair pricing?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED.' Without further documentation, the specific justification remains unclear. Typically, justifications for limited competition include reasons like urgent need, sole-source availability, or specific technical requirements. Agencies should provide detailed rationale and conduct price analysis to ensure fair and reasonable pricing even in limited competition scenarios.

How does the per-unit cost of these janitorial services compare to industry benchmarks for similar military installations?

A direct per-unit cost benchmark is not discernible from the provided data. The total contract value is $9.58 million over approximately 1935 days. To assess value, one would need to break down the services provided (e.g., square footage cleaned, frequency, specific tasks) and compare these metrics against industry standards for comparable military bases or large federal facilities.

What is the potential risk of service quality degradation or price inflation given the lack of competition?

The primary risk associated with a non-competed contract is the potential for reduced service quality or inflated prices due to the absence of market pressure. Without competing offers, the contractor may have less incentive to innovate or offer cost savings. Robust performance monitoring and clear contract terms are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure taxpayer value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Services to Buildings and Dwellings › Janitorial Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 5700 MOPAC EXPRESS SOUTH B, AUSTIN, TX, 90

Business Categories: AbilityOne Program Participant, Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline