DoD's $119M Aviation Contract Awarded to Dayton T. Brown, Inc. for Applied Research
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,902,663 ($11.9M)
Contractor: Dayton T. Brown, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 1999-09-21
End Date: 2005-07-30
Contract Duration: 2,139 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 199912!2100!1558!AH23 !USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!DAAH2399CR001 !A!*!* !19990921!20040920!002050177!002050177!002050177!N!96362!BROWN, DAYTON T INC !555 CHURCH ST !BOHEMIA !NY!11716!07157!103!36!BOHEMIA !SUFFOLK !NEW YORK !0001!+000000485185!N!N!000000000000!AD92!RDTE/OTHER DEFENSE-APPLIED RESEARCH !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !8731!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !N!U!2!002!K!* !C!N!Z!* !* !N!B!*!A!*!B!A!A!*!* !*!N!A!B!N!*!*!*!*!*!
Place of Performance
Location: BOHEMIA, SUFFOLK County, NEW YORK, 11716
State: New York Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $11.9 million to DAYTON T. BROWN, INC. for work described as: 199912!2100!1558!AH23 !USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!DAAH2399CR001 !A!*!* !19990921!20040920!002050177!002050177!002050177!N!96362!BROWN, DAYTON T INC !555 CHURCH ST !BOHEMIA !NY!11716!07157!103!36!BOHEMIA !SUFFOL… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $119,026,630, was awarded by the Department of Defense. 2. Dayton T. Brown, Inc. secured this contract, indicating potential specialized capabilities. 3. The contract falls under RDTE/OTHER DEFENSE-APPLIED RESEARCH, suggesting a focus on innovation. 4. Awarded via 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources', the procurement method warrants scrutiny for its competitive impact.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar applied research contracts is difficult due to the specialized nature of the work.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources'. This method suggests that while competition was sought, certain sources were excluded, potentially limiting the breadth of price discovery and innovation.
Taxpayer Impact: The significant value of this contract means that any inefficiencies or suboptimal pricing could have a substantial impact on taxpayer funds allocated to defense research and development.
Public Impact
Taxpayers are funding advanced defense research, potentially leading to technological advancements. The award to a single company, even after a competitive process, raises questions about broader industry engagement. The long duration of the contract (over 5 years) suggests a complex and ongoing research effort.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition due to exclusion of sources
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can increase risk of cost overruns
- Lack of specific details on the 'applied research' scope
Positive Signals
- Award to a company with a history in aviation and missile command support
- Contract supports critical defense research and development
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector, specifically for 'RDTE/OTHER DEFENSE-APPLIED RESEARCH'. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining technological superiority but can be prone to cost overruns due to the inherent uncertainties in research and development.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors. The primary awardee, Dayton T. Brown, Inc., is a mid-sized company, and further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the DoD. Oversight would typically involve program managers and contracting officers ensuring adherence to contract terms and performance standards. The 'Exclusion of Sources' clause warrants specific oversight to ensure fairness and justification.
Related Government Programs
- Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPFF contract type
- Limited competition raises concerns about optimal pricing and innovation
- Lack of transparency regarding source exclusion justification
- Difficulty in benchmarking specialized applied research contracts
- Long contract duration may indicate complexity or potential for delays
Tags
other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, ny, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $11.9 million to DAYTON T. BROWN, INC.. 199912!2100!1558!AH23 !USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!DAAH2399CR001 !A!*!* !19990921!20040920!002050177!002050177!002050177!N!96362!BROWN, DAYTON T INC !555 CHURCH ST !BOHEMIA !NY!11716!07157!103!36!BOHEMIA !SUFFOLK !NEW YORK !0001!+000000485185!N!N!000000000000!AD92!RDTE/OTHER DEFENSE-APPLIED RESEARCH !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !8731!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !N!U!2!0
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DAYTON T. BROWN, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 1999-09-21. End: 2005-07-30.
What specific applied research outcomes are expected from this $119M contract, and how will their value to national security be measured?
The contract details do not specify the exact nature of the applied research. Typically, such contracts aim to develop new technologies, improve existing systems, or explore novel concepts for defense applications. Measuring value involves assessing the successful development of prototypes, the potential for system integration, and the contribution to strategic defense objectives. Formal reviews and milestone achievements would be key indicators.
Given the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method, what was the justification for excluding other potential bidders, and how was fair market price ensured?
The justification for excluding sources is not provided in the data. This procurement method implies that while the competition was intended to be open, specific criteria or circumstances led to the exclusion of certain potential offerors. Ensuring fair market price would rely on the government's cost analysis, comparison with historical data, and negotiation strategies, but the limited pool of bidders could impact the robustness of this process.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract, and how will the government ensure effective cost control and timely delivery of research objectives?
Specific KPIs are not detailed in the provided data. For a CPFF contract, KPIs often relate to meeting research milestones, delivering technical reports, successful prototype development, and adherence to a defined research plan. Effective cost control and timely delivery are managed through rigorous government oversight, regular progress reviews, Earned Value Management (EVM) if applicable, and strict adherence to the contract's Statement of Work.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › DEFENSE (OTHER) R&D
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Contractor Details
Address: 555 CHURCH ST, BOHEMIA, NY, 02
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business
Timeline
Start Date: 1999-09-21
Current End Date: 2005-07-30
Potential End Date: 2005-07-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2008-03-10
More Contracts from Dayton T. Brown, Inc.
- PQL Task Order — $31.5M (Department of Defense)
- Task Order for Mobile Quick Look Support — $25.3M (Department of Defense)
- NEW Task Order Under the BOA for the MMS Support Services — $24.7M (Department of Defense)
- 200510!005311!2100!w58rgz!usa Aviation and Missile Command!w58rgz05c0318 !A!N! !Y! ! !20050729!20060131!002050177!002050177!002050177!n!dayton T Brown Inc !1175 Church ST !bohemia !ny!11716!07157!103!36!bohemia !suffolk !NEW York !+000003698286!n!n!000000000000!ad92!rdte/Other Defense-Applied Research !A2 !missile and Space Systems !000 !* !541710!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !B! !d!n!u!1!001!n!1g!z!y!z! ! !n!b!n!n! ! !A! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $17.6M (Department of Defense)
- Triton Remote Quick Look — $16.9M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)