Department of Energy awards $3.9M environmental remediation contract to S&K Mission Support, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,918,412 ($3.9M)

Contractor: S&K Mission Support, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Energy

Start Date: 2025-06-23

End Date: 2027-09-23

Contract Duration: 822 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SCOPE OF TASK ORDER 89303325FEM400452 INCLUDES ALL ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION SUPPORT REQUIRED THROUGH SITE CLOSURE, INCLUDING PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, PROJECT CONTROLS, SAFETY AND HEALTH, AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORTS.

Place of Performance

Location: GRAND JUNCTION, MESA County, COLORADO, 81501

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Energy obligated $3.9 million to S&K MISSION SUPPORT, LLC for work described as: SCOPE OF TASK ORDER 89303325FEM400452 INCLUDES ALL ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION SUPPORT REQUIRED THROUGH SITE CLOSURE, INCLUDING PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, PROJECT CONTROLS, SAFETY AND HEALTH, AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORTS. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on comprehensive environmental remediation support through site closure. 2. Includes program management, project controls, safety, and IT/communications. 3. S&K Mission Support, LLC is the awarded contractor. 4. Contract duration is approximately 2.7 years. 5. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, indicating predictable costs. 6. Awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.9 million for environmental remediation support over 2.7 years appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale environmental cleanup contracts managed by the Department of Energy would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs, but the total cost will depend on the actual work required for site closure.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources.' This suggests that while the initial solicitation might have had some exclusions, the final award was made through a competitive process open to all eligible offerors. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' nature implies a robust competition, which generally leads to better price discovery and value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process helps ensure that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by driving down prices and encouraging innovative solutions from multiple qualified contractors.

Public Impact

The Department of Energy benefits from comprehensive environmental remediation services. Services include program management, project controls, safety, and IT support. The contract supports the closure of environmental sites, contributing to regulatory compliance and environmental protection. Geographic impact is focused on the specific site(s) requiring remediation in Colorado. Workforce implications include potential employment opportunities for environmental scientists, engineers, project managers, and IT specialists.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Environmental remediation services represent a critical sector within government contracting, particularly for agencies like the Department of Energy tasked with managing legacy contamination. The market includes specialized firms capable of handling complex cleanup operations, safety protocols, and regulatory compliance. This contract fits within the broader category of environmental services, which can range from site assessment to full-scale cleanup and monitoring. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within DOE's historical environmental management budgets.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary contractor, S&K Mission Support, LLC, is likely a larger entity. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this data. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether S&K Mission Support, LLC actively seeks small business subcontractors for specialized services.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within budget. Transparency is typically facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-energy, environmental-remediation, site-closure, program-management, it-support, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, s-and-k-mission-support-llc, colorado, remediation-services, federal-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Energy awarded $3.9 million to S&K MISSION SUPPORT, LLC. SCOPE OF TASK ORDER 89303325FEM400452 INCLUDES ALL ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION SUPPORT REQUIRED THROUGH SITE CLOSURE, INCLUDING PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, PROJECT CONTROLS, SAFETY AND HEALTH, AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORTS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is S&K MISSION SUPPORT, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-06-23. End: 2027-09-23.

What is S&K Mission Support, LLC's track record with the Department of Energy and similar environmental remediation contracts?

Assessing S&K Mission Support, LLC's track record requires a review of their past performance with the Department of Energy and other federal agencies, particularly on contracts of similar scope and value. Key indicators include on-time delivery, adherence to budget, quality of work, safety record, and any past performance issues or disputes. Information on previous contracts, including their size, duration, and outcomes, would be crucial for a comprehensive evaluation. Without specific historical data on S&K Mission Support, LLC's performance on environmental remediation projects, it is difficult to definitively assess their capability and reliability for this specific task order.

How does the $3.9 million contract value compare to similar environmental remediation efforts at DOE sites?

The $3.9 million contract value for environmental remediation support through site closure, encompassing program management, project controls, safety, and IT, needs to be benchmarked against comparable Department of Energy (DOE) contracts. Factors influencing cost include the complexity of the site, the extent of contamination, regulatory requirements, and the duration of the remediation effort. A preliminary assessment suggests this value is moderate for a multi-year, comprehensive support contract. However, a detailed comparison with historical DOE environmental remediation contracts, considering the specific scope of work and site conditions, is necessary to determine if this represents excellent, good, or fair value for money.

What are the primary risks associated with this environmental remediation contract?

The primary risks associated with this environmental remediation contract include unforeseen environmental conditions that could significantly increase costs and extend timelines beyond initial estimates. Contractor performance risk is also a factor; any delays or quality issues from S&K Mission Support, LLC could impact site closure progress and regulatory compliance. Furthermore, the integration of IT and communications support with physical remediation activities presents a technical risk. Safety risks inherent in environmental cleanup operations are also a concern, requiring robust management protocols. Finally, the firm-fixed-price nature, while offering cost certainty, could penalize the contractor if unforeseen complexities arise, potentially leading to disputes or performance compromises.

How effective is the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method for ensuring value in environmental remediation contracts?

The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method aims to balance the need for specialized capabilities with broad market participation. By excluding certain sources initially, the agency might be targeting specific technical requirements or socioeconomic goals. However, the subsequent 'full and open' phase allows a wider pool of qualified contractors to compete, which generally promotes price competition and innovation. The effectiveness in ensuring value depends on the clarity of the solicitation, the competitiveness of the resulting bids, and the agency's ability to properly evaluate proposals. If the exclusion criteria were too narrow or the subsequent competition lacked sufficient bidders, the value achieved might be suboptimal compared to a purely unrestricted full and open competition.

What is the historical spending trend for environmental remediation services by the Department of Energy?

The Department of Energy has historically allocated significant funding towards environmental remediation, stemming from decades of nuclear weapons production and energy research. Annual spending in this area often runs into billions of dollars, reflecting the scale and complexity of cleaning up legacy sites across the nation. Trends are influenced by regulatory mandates, the pace of site closures, technological advancements, and budget appropriations. While specific year-over-year trends fluctuate, there is a consistent, substantial federal commitment to environmental cleanup. This $3.9 million contract represents a small fraction of the overall DOE environmental remediation budget.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesRemediation and Other Waste Management ServicesRemediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENTNATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 63066 OLD HIGHWAY 93 STE M, SAINT IGNATIUS, MT, 59865

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $15,847,028

Exercised Options: $10,326,799

Current Obligation: $3,918,412

Actual Outlays: $2,250,964

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 1

Total Subaward Amount: $250,561

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 89303322DEM000085

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-06-23

Current End Date: 2027-09-23

Potential End Date: 2029-03-23 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-01-27

More Contracts from S&K Mission Support, LLC

View all S&K Mission Support, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Energy Contracts

View all Department of Energy contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending