NASA awards $4.1M environmental support contract to HSG, LLC for Langley Research Center
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $4,115,790 ($4.1M)
Contractor: HSG, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2022-10-01
End Date: 2025-09-30
Contract Duration: 1,095 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER.
Place of Performance
Location: HAMPTON, HAMPTON CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23681
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $4.1 million to HSG, LLC for work described as: ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on environmental consulting services, a critical area for research facilities. 2. HSG, LLC, the selected contractor, will provide support over a three-year period. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which allows for flexibility but requires careful cost monitoring. 5. The value of the contract is moderate within the context of federal environmental services. 6. Performance is located in Virginia, impacting the local and regional economy.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $4.1 million over three years for environmental consulting services at a NASA research center appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar contracts for environmental support at federal research facilities suggests this is within a typical range. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure, while offering flexibility for evolving environmental needs, necessitates diligent oversight to ensure costs remain controlled and that the fixed fee represents fair compensation for the contractor's management and profit.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while the competition was broad, specific sources may have been excluded for defined reasons. The fact that it was open to all qualified bidders suggests a healthy level of competition, which typically drives better pricing and service quality. The number of bidders is not specified, but the open nature of the competition is a positive indicator for price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple firms to bid, potentially leading to lower overall costs and a wider array of innovative solutions for environmental challenges at the research center.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is NASA's Langley Research Center, which will receive essential environmental consulting services to ensure compliance and operational sustainability. Services delivered include environmental assessments, compliance monitoring, and potentially remediation planning, supporting the center's research and development activities. The geographic impact is concentrated in Hampton, Virginia, where Langley Research Center is located. Workforce implications may include direct employment by HSG, LLC and potential indirect employment through subcontractors, contributing to the local economy.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed meticulously, as the contractor is reimbursed for actual costs plus a fixed fee.
- The exclusion of sources, even within a full and open competition framework, warrants understanding the rationale to ensure no potentially valuable bidders were unfairly omitted.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess the contractor's past performance or potential future effectiveness without further review.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process that likely yielded competitive pricing.
- The contract duration of three years provides stability for essential environmental services at a critical research facility.
- The contractor, HSG, LLC, is tasked with providing specialized environmental consulting, a vital service for NASA's operations and regulatory compliance.
Sector Analysis
Environmental consulting services represent a significant segment within the broader professional services sector supporting government operations. This contract fits within the niche of environmental compliance, assessment, and management, crucial for federal agencies with extensive physical infrastructure and research activities like NASA. Comparable spending benchmarks for environmental support at federal research facilities often range from hundreds of thousands to several million dollars annually, depending on the scope and complexity of the site.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary set-aside consideration for this specific contract award. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from set-aside requirements. However, the prime contractor, HSG, LLC, may still engage small businesses as subcontractors, depending on their own procurement practices and the specific needs of the environmental services required.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will primarily fall under the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), likely through its contracting officer and technical representatives. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated by the contract's award notice, but detailed operational oversight and Inspector General jurisdiction would depend on NASA's internal policies and the specific nature of any potential issues arising during contract performance.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Environmental Management Programs
- Federal Environmental Consulting Services
- Research and Development Facility Support Contracts
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts
- Environmental Compliance Services
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type requires diligent oversight to manage potential cost escalations.
- Understanding the rationale behind 'Exclusion of Sources' in an otherwise 'Full and Open' competition is important for ensuring maximum value.
- Performance metrics and historical performance data for HSG, LLC are not detailed in this award notice, necessitating further review for a complete risk assessment.
Tags
nasa, environmental-consulting, langley-research-center, hsg-llc, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, virginia, professional-services, research-and-development, environmental-support, nasa-agency
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $4.1 million to HSG, LLC. ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is HSG, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $4.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-10-01. End: 2025-09-30.
What is the track record of HSG, LLC in performing similar environmental consulting services for federal agencies?
A comprehensive review of HSG, LLC's track record would involve examining their past performance evaluations on federal contracts, particularly those involving environmental consulting for research or aerospace facilities. This includes looking at contract close-out reports, any documented disputes or claims, and feedback from previous government clients. Without access to specific past performance data (e.g., CPARS reports), it's difficult to definitively assess their capabilities. However, their selection for this NASA contract suggests they met the agency's pre-qualification criteria and demonstrated sufficient relevant experience and technical competence to be considered a viable candidate in a competitive bidding environment.
How does the $4.1 million contract value compare to similar environmental support contracts at other NASA research centers or federal facilities?
The $4.1 million contract value over three years for environmental support services at NASA's Langley Research Center appears to be within a moderate range when compared to similar contracts at other federal research and development facilities. Contracts for environmental consulting can vary significantly based on the size and complexity of the facility, the specific services required (e.g., hazardous waste management, site remediation, environmental impact assessments), and the duration. For a facility like Langley, which engages in extensive research and development, this level of funding suggests a need for ongoing, comprehensive environmental management. Larger, more complex sites or those with significant remediation needs might see contracts valued in the tens of millions, while smaller facilities or those with simpler compliance requirements might have contracts in the hundreds of thousands.
What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for environmental services, and how are they mitigated?
The primary risk with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract is the potential for cost overruns. Since the contractor is reimbursed for actual allowable costs plus a predetermined fixed fee (profit and indirect costs), there is less incentive for them to control expenses compared to fixed-price contracts. If costs escalate unexpectedly due to unforeseen site conditions, regulatory changes, or inefficient performance, the government bears the burden of these increased costs, while the contractor's profit remains fixed. Mitigation strategies employed by the government include rigorous cost monitoring, detailed audits of contractor expenditures, clearly defined scope of work, and strong technical oversight by government representatives to ensure that all costs incurred are reasonable, allocable, and necessary for contract performance.
What is the expected effectiveness of the environmental services provided under this contract in ensuring NASA's compliance and operational goals?
The expected effectiveness hinges on the clarity of the contract's performance standards and the diligence of both the contractor (HSG, LLC) and NASA's oversight team. Environmental services are crucial for ensuring NASA Langley Research Center complies with federal, state, and local environmental regulations, thereby avoiding fines, legal challenges, and operational disruptions. Effective services should lead to proactive identification and management of environmental risks, support sustainable research operations, and contribute to the center's environmental stewardship goals. The CPFF structure allows for adaptation to evolving environmental challenges, but NASA's technical representatives must actively manage the scope and ensure that the services delivered directly support the center's mission and compliance obligations.
How does this contract's value and scope compare to historical federal spending on environmental consulting services for NASA or similar agencies?
This $4.1 million contract represents a specific allocation for environmental support at one NASA center over three years. Historical federal spending on environmental consulting is substantial, encompassing a wide array of services across numerous agencies and facilities. NASA, as a major research and development entity, consistently requires significant environmental services to manage its unique operational footprint, including aerospace testing and materials research. Comparing this single contract requires looking at the aggregate spending trends for environmental services within NASA and across agencies like the Department of Defense or Department of Energy, which also manage large, complex sites. This contract appears to be a standard-sized award for specialized support at a single, significant federal installation.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: 80LARC22R0007
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2831 SAINT ROSE PKWY STE 213, HENDERSON, NV, 89052
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $4,281,336
Exercised Options: $4,281,336
Current Obligation: $4,115,790
Actual Outlays: $4,105,640
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 2
Total Subaward Amount: $405,789
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80KSC020D0023
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-10-01
Current End Date: 2025-09-30
Potential End Date: 2025-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-03
More Contracts from HSG, LLC
- Nemcon Task Order for Occupational Medical Services for Nasa Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, MD, and Wallops Flight Facility in Wallops Island, VA — $2.2M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- This Task Order Provides Occupational Heath, Fitness, Wellness, the Employee Assistance Program (EAP) and Medical Employability Services for Nasa Headquarters — $200.0K (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →