NASA Awards $3.2M for JSC Historic Preservation Interpretive Park
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $3,237,803 ($3.2M)
Contractor: Ayuda Companies
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2019-07-26
End Date: 2026-05-31
Contract Duration: 2,501 days
Daily Burn Rate: $1.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: WORKING WITH THE JSC HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, DEVELOP A CONCEPTUAL PLANFOR THE INTERPRETIVE PARK UTILIZING THE THEMES OF THE INTERPRETIVE PLAN. INCLUDERENDERINGS OF INTERPRETIVE PARK, REQUIRED SIGNAGE, AND STORYTELLING ELEMENTS OF THEGARDEN
Place of Performance
Location: DENVER, DENVER County, COLORADO, 80204
State: Colorado Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $3.2 million to AYUDA COMPANIES for work described as: WORKING WITH THE JSC HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, DEVELOP A CONCEPTUAL PLANFOR THE INTERPRETIVE PARK UTILIZING THE THEMES OF THE INTERPRETIVE PLAN. INCLUDERENDERINGS OF INTERPRETIVE PARK, REQUIRED SIGNAGE, AND STORYTELLING ELEMENTS OF THEGARDEN Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Ayuda Companies for conceptual planning and design of an interpretive park. 2. Focus on historic preservation themes, renderings, signage, and storytelling elements. 3. Project duration spans from July 2019 to May 2026. 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type indicates a defined cost structure.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $3.2M for a 7-year project seems reasonable for conceptual planning and design services. Benchmarking against similar park development or historic preservation projects would provide a clearer picture of value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of taxpayer funds for historic preservation and public interpretation is a common government function, with the value derived from cultural preservation and public engagement.
Public Impact
Enhances public understanding and appreciation of NASA's historic sites. Preserves and interprets the historical significance of Johnson Space Center. Creates educational and engaging experiences for visitors and the public.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long project duration may lead to scope creep or cost overruns if not managed effectively.
- Reliance on conceptual plans requires detailed execution phases for successful implementation.
Positive Signals
- Focus on historic preservation aligns with cultural heritage goals.
- Interpretive park development can boost public engagement and education.
- Full and open competition suggests a fair and competitive award process.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically related to architectural, engineering, and design services for cultural and historical sites. Spending benchmarks for similar interpretive park development projects are not readily available but typically involve significant investment in planning and execution.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to assess small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract is managed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), which has established oversight mechanisms for project management and financial accountability. The long duration necessitates ongoing monitoring.
Related Government Programs
- Remediation Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep due to long project duration.
- Dependence on future detailed design and construction phases.
- Risk of historical interpretation becoming outdated if not actively managed.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the initial award data.
Tags
remediation-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, co, delivery-order, 1m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $3.2 million to AYUDA COMPANIES. WORKING WITH THE JSC HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, DEVELOP A CONCEPTUAL PLANFOR THE INTERPRETIVE PARK UTILIZING THE THEMES OF THE INTERPRETIVE PLAN. INCLUDERENDERINGS OF INTERPRETIVE PARK, REQUIRED SIGNAGE, AND STORYTELLING ELEMENTS OF THEGARDEN
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AYUDA COMPANIES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $3.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2019-07-26. End: 2026-05-31.
What is the estimated cost per square foot for the interpretive park development based on the conceptual plan?
The provided data focuses on the conceptual planning and design phase and does not include detailed cost breakdowns for physical construction. Therefore, an estimated cost per square foot for the park's development cannot be determined from this information. Further documentation from the design and execution phases would be required.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for measuring the success of the interpretive park's storytelling elements?
Key performance indicators for the interpretive park's success are not detailed in the provided contract data. Typically, KPIs might include visitor engagement metrics, educational impact assessments, positive feedback surveys, and the successful integration of historical narratives. NASA's project management would likely define these during the execution phase.
How will the long project duration (2019-2026) impact the relevance and accuracy of the historical interpretations?
The long duration requires careful project management to ensure the historical interpretations remain relevant and accurate. Regular reviews and updates based on new research or archival findings will be crucial. The conceptual plan should incorporate flexibility to adapt to evolving historical understanding and preservation best practices throughout the project lifecycle.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 410 ACOMA ST, DENVER, CO, 80204
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $3,237,803
Exercised Options: $3,237,803
Current Obligation: $3,237,803
Actual Outlays: $2,976,085
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS10F0043W
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2019-07-26
Current End Date: 2026-05-31
Potential End Date: 2026-05-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-23
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →