NASA's $2.5B GEOXO ACX instrument contract awarded to BAE Systems for advanced atmospheric monitoring
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $25,000,000 ($25.0M)
Contractor: BAE Systems Space & Mission Systems Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2024-05-20
End Date: 2048-10-31
Contract Duration: 8,930 days
Daily Burn Rate: $2.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: GEOSTATIONARY EXTENDED OBSERVATIONS (GEOXO) ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION (ACX) IS A NEW INSTRUMENT FOR THE GEOXO WEATHER SATELLITE SERIES. ACX IS A HYPERSPECTRAL, UV THROUGH VISIBLE IMAGING SPECTROMETER.
Place of Performance
Location: BOULDER, BOULDER County, COLORADO, 80301
State: Colorado Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $25.0 million to BAE SYSTEMS SPACE & MISSION SYSTEMS INC. for work described as: GEOSTATIONARY EXTENDED OBSERVATIONS (GEOXO) ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION (ACX) IS A NEW INSTRUMENT FOR THE GEOXO WEATHER SATELLITE SERIES. ACX IS A HYPERSPECTRAL, UV THROUGH VISIBLE IMAGING SPECTROMETER. Key points: 1. Contract aims to enhance weather forecasting capabilities with a new hyperspectral imaging spectrometer. 2. BAE Systems, a major defense and aerospace contractor, secured this significant award. 3. The contract spans over 24 years, indicating a long-term commitment to the GEOXO program. 4. This award represents a substantial investment in space-based atmospheric observation technology. 5. The use of a Cost Plus Award Fee contract type suggests performance incentives are tied to mission success. 6. The definitive contract structure provides a framework for ongoing work and potential modifications.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $2.5 billion over approximately 24 years suggests a significant investment in a critical national asset. Benchmarking this against similar large-scale satellite instrument development contracts is challenging due to the unique nature of the GEOXO program and its specific instrument requirements. However, the Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure implies that the final cost could vary based on performance, making direct price comparisons difficult without understanding the award fee criteria and achieved performance levels. The definitive contract nature allows for flexibility, but requires careful oversight to manage costs effectively.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple capable vendors had the opportunity to bid. This process is designed to foster a competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and innovative solutions. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the full and open nature suggests a robust selection process was undertaken by NASA.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by promoting a level playing field for contractors, which can drive down costs and improve the quality of goods and services received.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the public through improved weather forecasting and climate monitoring capabilities. The contract will deliver a new hyperspectral imaging spectrometer (ACX) for the GEOXO satellite series. Enhanced atmospheric data will support disaster preparedness, aviation safety, and climate research. The contract is expected to have implications for the aerospace workforce, particularly in specialized engineering and manufacturing roles. The geographic impact is global, as weather patterns transcend national borders, but initial deployment is tied to NASA's GEOXO program.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- The long contract duration (over 24 years) increases the risk of cost overruns or scope creep if not managed diligently.
- The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure, while incentivizing performance, can lead to higher final costs compared to fixed-price contracts if award fees are consistently maximized.
- Reliance on a single contractor for a critical instrument over such an extended period could pose supply chain or technological obsolescence risks.
- The complexity of a hyperspectral imager requires specialized expertise, and any technical challenges could lead to delays and increased costs.
Positive Signals
- Awarding under full and open competition suggests a thorough vetting process and potential for competitive pricing.
- The selection of BAE Systems, a reputable aerospace contractor, indicates a level of confidence in their technical capabilities and past performance.
- The CPAF structure, if managed effectively, can incentivize contractor performance and ensure the instrument meets stringent technical requirements.
- The long-term nature of the contract supports program stability and allows for sustained development and operational support.
Sector Analysis
The contract falls within the aerospace and defense sector, specifically focusing on satellite technology and instrumentation. The market for advanced space-based sensors is highly specialized, with a limited number of companies possessing the requisite expertise. NASA's investment in the GEOXO program and its ACX instrument signifies a commitment to advancing Earth observation capabilities, aligning with global trends in climate monitoring and weather prediction. Comparable spending benchmarks would likely involve other major satellite development programs, such as those for weather satellites or Earth science missions, which often represent multi-billion dollar investments.
Small Business Impact
The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements for this contract. As a large-scale, complex instrument development program, it is likely that BAE Systems will engage various subcontractors, potentially including small businesses for specialized components or services. However, without explicit subcontracting plans or set-aside goals, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem remains unclear and would require further investigation into the contractor's procurement practices.
Oversight & Accountability
NASA's contract oversight mechanisms are typically robust, involving program management reviews, technical assessments, and financial audits. The definitive contract structure and CPAF payment type necessitate close monitoring of performance metrics, cost expenditures, and adherence to technical specifications. The agency's Inspector General's office would also have jurisdiction to investigate potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract, ensuring accountability and transparency throughout the project lifecycle.
Related Government Programs
- Geostationary Weather Satellites
- Earth Observing System
- Space-Based Weather Instruments
- Hyperspectral Imaging Technology
- National Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS)
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration increases potential for cost escalation.
- Cost Plus Award Fee structure requires careful monitoring of performance incentives.
- Technological complexity of hyperspectral imager presents development risks.
- Potential for contractor performance issues over extended period.
Tags
nasa, space-based-observation, weather-forecasting, instrument-development, hyperspectral-imaging, geostationary-orbit, full-and-open-competition, cost-plus-award-fee, aerospace, defense-contractor, long-term-contract, atmospheric-composition
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $25.0 million to BAE SYSTEMS SPACE & MISSION SYSTEMS INC.. GEOSTATIONARY EXTENDED OBSERVATIONS (GEOXO) ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION (ACX) IS A NEW INSTRUMENT FOR THE GEOXO WEATHER SATELLITE SERIES. ACX IS A HYPERSPECTRAL, UV THROUGH VISIBLE IMAGING SPECTROMETER.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BAE SYSTEMS SPACE & MISSION SYSTEMS INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $25.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-05-20. End: 2048-10-31.
What is the historical performance record of BAE Systems Space & Mission Systems Inc. with NASA on similar large-scale instrument development contracts?
BAE Systems, through its various divisions and acquisitions, has a long history of supporting NASA and other government agencies on complex space programs. While specific details on their performance with NASA on comparable instrument development contracts require deep-diving into historical contract databases, the company is generally recognized for its capabilities in spacecraft systems, payloads, and mission support. NASA's selection of BAE Systems for the GEOXO ACX instrument suggests a positive assessment of their technical qualifications, past performance, and ability to meet stringent requirements. However, a thorough review would involve examining specific contract awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any instances of cost overruns or schedule delays on previous, similar projects to fully gauge their track record.
How does the $2.5 billion contract value compare to the estimated cost of developing similar hyperspectral imaging instruments for space applications?
Determining a precise benchmark for the $2.5 billion contract value is challenging due to the unique specifications of the GEOXO ACX instrument and the long-term nature of the definitive contract. Hyperspectral imagers are inherently complex and expensive to develop, especially for space-qualified applications requiring high reliability and specific performance characteristics. The total contract value covers not just the initial development but likely includes integration, testing, launch support, and potentially extended operations or data processing over its lifespan. Comparable large-scale space instrument programs, such as those for weather satellites or Earth observation missions, often run into hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars. The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure also means the final cost could fluctuate based on performance, making direct comparisons to fixed-price contracts difficult. Without detailed technical specifications and market analysis of similar recent procurements, a definitive value-for-money assessment relative to market rates is complex.
What are the primary technical risks associated with developing and deploying the ACX instrument, and how are they being mitigated?
The primary technical risks associated with the ACX instrument likely stem from its complexity as a hyperspectral imager designed for a geostationary platform. These risks can include achieving the required spectral and spatial resolution, ensuring long-term radiometric stability, managing thermal control in the space environment, and mitigating the effects of radiation. Developing novel sensor technologies or pushing the boundaries of existing ones inherently carries risk. NASA and BAE Systems would mitigate these through rigorous design reviews, extensive ground testing and validation, component screening, redundancy in critical systems, and phased development approaches. The CPAF contract type also incentivizes BAE Systems to proactively identify and address technical challenges to achieve performance milestones and earn award fees, thereby aligning contractor and agency interests in risk mitigation.
What is the expected impact of the GEOXO ACX instrument on weather forecasting accuracy and climate monitoring over its operational lifespan?
The GEOXO ACX instrument is expected to significantly enhance weather forecasting accuracy and climate monitoring by providing unprecedented, continuous, high-resolution atmospheric data from a geostationary orbit. As a hyperspectral imager, it can capture detailed spectral signatures across the UV to visible range, enabling more precise identification and quantification of atmospheric constituents like aerosols, ozone, and water vapor. This improved data will allow for more accurate short-term weather predictions (nowcasting), better assimilation into numerical weather prediction models for medium-range forecasts, and more robust long-term climate trend analysis. Enhanced understanding of atmospheric composition is crucial for tracking air quality, volcanic ash plumes, and other phenomena that impact public safety, aviation, and environmental health.
How does NASA's spending on the GEOXO program, including this ACX instrument contract, compare to historical investments in similar geostationary weather satellite initiatives?
NASA's investment in the GEOXO program, with the ACX instrument contract valued at $2.5 billion, represents a substantial commitment to advancing geostationary weather observation capabilities. Historically, major geostationary weather satellite programs, such as GOES (Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite) series managed by NOAA, have also involved multi-billion dollar investments over their development and operational lifecycles. For instance, the GOES-R series development alone was in the billions. The GEOXO program, building upon previous efforts, aims to incorporate next-generation technologies like the ACX instrument to provide enhanced data continuity and new observational capabilities. Comparing specific instrument costs requires detailed program breakdowns, but the overall scale of investment aligns with the high cost associated with developing and deploying sophisticated, long-duration space-based assets critical for national weather and climate services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › Space R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: 80GSFC23R0012
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1600 COMMERCE ST UNIT 1, BOULDER, CO, 80301
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $365,806,316
Exercised Options: $262,188,471
Current Obligation: $25,000,000
Actual Outlays: $20,016,072
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 3
Total Subaward Amount: $753,925
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-05-20
Current End Date: 2048-10-31
Potential End Date: 2048-10-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-07-24
More Contracts from BAE Systems Space & Mission Systems Inc.
- Weather System Follow-On - Microwave - System Design of Satellite With Microwave Radiometer and Sensor — $528.5M (Department of Defense)
- Engineering Services and Development Leading to the Delivery of the Omps Protoflight Model and Support — $479.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Jpss-1 Mission Spacecraft Rapid III Delivery Order #3. Rapid III Provides Core Spacecraft Systems in Support of the Scientific and Technology Development Goals of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center, and Other Federal Agencies. the Scope of Work Includes Design, Build and Test, Payload Integration and Test, Launch Vehicle Integration and Support and On-Orbit Checkout and Acceptance — $365.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- THE Woma Requirement WAS Issued AS a Full and Open Competitive Procurement to Design, Analyze, Develop, Fabricate, Integrate, Test, and Evaluate the Wide Field Instrument (WFI) Opto-Mechanical Assembly (woma) for the Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (wfirst) Mission. in Addition, IT Defines the Tasks Necessary to Support the Subsequent Integration, Test, Evaluation, and Validation of the WFI. IT Defines the Post-Delivery Support to Payload and Observatory Integration and Test, and to Pre-Launch, Launch and Commissioning Activities AT the Mission Operations Center (MOC) and to Supply and Maintain the Instrument Ground Support Equipment (GSE) — $307.9M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Aeronautical&space Administration (nasa) and the Goddard Space Flight Center (gsfc) HAS a Requirement for the Continuation of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Microwave Imager (GMI) Instrument. the GMI Instrument IS a 13 Channel Radiometer Whose Core Science Measures the Earth S Atmospheric Moisture Within 10.65 GHZ Through 183 GHZ of the Microwave Spectrum — $233.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
View all BAE Systems Space & Mission Systems Inc. federal contracts →
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →