NASA's $39.2M Intelligent Systems R&D contract to KBR Wyle Services, LLC, supports critical flight and software operations
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $39,242,022 ($39.2M)
Contractor: KBR Wyle Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2020-05-01
End Date: 2022-04-30
Contract Duration: 729 days
Daily Burn Rate: $53.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT 3 - TASK ORDER 1 (CODE TI IDIQ WORK). SUPPORTS: TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AREAS, MISSION OPERATIONS, FLIGHT OPERATIONS, AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT.
Place of Performance
Location: MOFFETT FIELD, SANTA CLARA County, CALIFORNIA, 94035
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $39.2 million to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC for work described as: INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT 3 - TASK ORDER 1 (CODE TI IDIQ WORK). SUPPORTS: TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AREAS, MISSION OPERATIONS, FLIGHT OPERATIONS, AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT. Key points: 1. Contract provides essential R&D support for NASA's technology research, mission operations, flight operations, and software engineering. 2. The contract's cost-plus-fixed-fee structure incentivizes efficient performance while managing project scope. 3. A full and open competition indicates a broad market engagement, potentially leading to competitive pricing. 4. The duration of 729 days suggests a sustained need for these specialized R&D services. 5. This contract falls under R&D in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences, a key area for technological advancement. 6. The contract's value is significant within its specific R&D niche, supporting advanced aerospace capabilities.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $39.2 million over two years for specialized R&D support appears reasonable when benchmarked against similar complex engineering and research services procured by federal agencies. The cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) pricing structure, while allowing for flexibility, requires careful monitoring to ensure cost containment. Without specific per-unit cost data, a direct comparison is challenging, but the overall value aligns with the critical nature of supporting NASA's flight and software operations.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, suggesting that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. This approach typically fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and a wider selection of innovative solutions. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation is a positive indicator for price discovery and market responsiveness.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by promoting a competitive marketplace, which can drive down costs and improve the quality of services received by the government.
Public Impact
Benefits NASA's mission-critical operations, including technology research, flight operations, and software systems engineering. Supports the development and enhancement of intelligent systems crucial for future space exploration and scientific endeavors. The services delivered are essential for maintaining and advancing NASA's technological capabilities. The contract's impact is primarily on the aerospace and technology sectors, fostering innovation and expertise.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns inherent in Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts if not rigorously managed.
- Reliance on a single task order under a larger IDIQ could concentrate risk if the IDIQ vehicle itself has limitations.
- The specific technical scope of 'intelligent systems' can be complex and subject to evolving requirements.
Positive Signals
- Awarded to a single contractor (KBR Wyle Services, LLC) suggests a strong capability match for the required R&D support.
- The contract supports critical NASA functions, indicating alignment with strategic government objectives.
- Full and open competition process implies a robust selection mechanism and potential for competitive pricing.
Sector Analysis
This contract operates within the Research and Development (R&D) sector, specifically focusing on physical, engineering, and life sciences. The market for intelligent systems R&D is highly specialized, involving advanced computing, AI, and complex engineering. Comparable spending benchmarks would likely be found within other federal agencies investing in similar advanced technology research, such as the Department of Defense or Department of Energy, for mission-critical applications.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal. However, the prime contractor may engage small businesses as subcontractors for specialized support, though this is not explicitly detailed in the provided data.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by NASA's contracting officers and program managers, ensuring adherence to the contract terms and performance standards. The cost-plus-fixed-fee structure necessitates close financial oversight to manage costs effectively. Transparency is generally maintained through contract reporting mechanisms, and while specific IG jurisdiction isn't detailed, the NASA OIG would have oversight over potential fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Research and Development Contracts
- Intelligent Systems Technology Programs
- Aerospace Engineering Support Services
- Software Systems Engineering Contracts
- Mission Operations Support
Risk Flags
- Cost Overrun Risk (CPFF)
- Technical Scope Creep
- Contractor Performance Variability
Tags
research-and-development, intelligent-systems, nasa, kbr-wyle-services, delivery-order, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, aerospace, california, technology
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $39.2 million to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC. INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT 3 - TASK ORDER 1 (CODE TI IDIQ WORK). SUPPORTS: TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AREAS, MISSION OPERATIONS, FLIGHT OPERATIONS, AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $39.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2020-05-01. End: 2022-04-30.
What is the track record of KBR Wyle Services, LLC in supporting NASA's R&D initiatives?
KBR Wyle Services, LLC, has a significant history of supporting NASA and other government agencies with complex engineering, scientific, and technical services. Their expertise spans various domains, including aerospace, defense, and energy. For NASA, they have been involved in numerous projects related to space exploration, mission support, and research and development. Their experience often includes providing specialized personnel, systems engineering, and operational support. The company's long-standing presence in the federal contracting space suggests a proven ability to meet stringent performance requirements and manage complex projects, which is crucial for R&D endeavors like the one detailed in this task order.
How does the $39.2 million value compare to similar R&D contracts for intelligent systems?
The $39.2 million value for this two-year task order supporting intelligent systems R&D is substantial and reflects the specialized nature of the work. Benchmarking against similar contracts is complex due to the unique requirements of 'intelligent systems' which can encompass AI, machine learning, robotics, and advanced data processing. However, for federal R&D contracts in advanced technology areas, values in the tens of millions of dollars over a similar timeframe are not uncommon, especially when supporting critical national objectives like those of NASA. Contracts for advanced software development, systems engineering, and specialized research often fall within this range, indicating that this contract's value is commensurate with the scope and criticality of the services provided.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?
The primary risks associated with this contract include potential cost overruns due to the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure, evolving technical requirements in the rapidly advancing field of intelligent systems, and potential performance issues if contractor expertise is misaligned with specific project needs. Mitigation strategies typically involve rigorous oversight by NASA program managers to monitor expenditures and progress, clearly defined milestones and deliverables within the task order, and performance metrics to assess contractor success. The CPFF structure itself, while offering flexibility, requires strong financial controls and regular audits to prevent uncontrolled cost growth. Furthermore, the full and open competition process aims to select a contractor with a proven track record, reducing performance risk.
How effective is the full and open competition process in ensuring value for money for this type of R&D contract?
The full and open competition process is generally considered effective in ensuring value for money for R&D contracts, including those for intelligent systems. By allowing all responsible sources to submit bids, it maximizes the pool of potential offerors, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive proposals. This competition can drive down prices and encourage innovation as contractors strive to differentiate their offerings. For R&D, it also allows NASA to select the offeror with the best combination of technical approach, past performance, and price. While the ultimate value depends on the specific proposals received and the negotiation process, the open competition framework provides a strong foundation for achieving cost-effectiveness and technical superiority.
What is the historical spending pattern for intelligent systems R&D support at NASA?
Historical spending patterns for intelligent systems R&D support at NASA indicate a consistent and growing investment in this area over the years. As AI, machine learning, and advanced computing become increasingly integral to space exploration, mission operations, and scientific discovery, NASA has strategically allocated significant resources. This includes funding for internal research, grants to academic institutions, and contracts with private sector entities like KBR Wyle Services. While specific historical figures for 'intelligent systems R&D support' can vary based on how the category is defined, overall NASA spending on advanced technology research and development has been substantial, reflecting its commitment to maintaining a technological edge in space exploration and aeronautics.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › Space R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: KBR, Inc.
Address: 8120 MAPLE LAWN BLVD, FULTON, MD, 20759
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $41,447,340
Exercised Options: $41,447,340
Current Obligation: $39,242,022
Actual Outlays: $39,230,834
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 14
Total Subaward Amount: $24,829,348
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80ARC020D0010
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2020-05-01
Current End Date: 2022-04-30
Potential End Date: 2022-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-04-17
More Contracts from KBR Wyle Services, LLC
- Bioastronautics Contract-Activities for the Health &productivity of Crews Working and Living in Space — $1.5B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Fpds-Ng Mission Systems Operations Contract (msoc) — $1.0B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Acquire Engineering Services and Related Services to MSD and Related Organizations Throughout Gsfc, AS Required, for the Formulation, Design, Development, Fabrication, Integration, Testing, Verification, and Operations of Space Flight and Ground System Hardware and Software, Including Development and Validation of NEW Technologies to Enable Future Space and Science Missions. the Engineering Areas of Emphasis ARE Multidisciplinary With Concentration in the Mechanical Engineering Areas of Materials, Structural Analysis and Loads, Mechanical Design, Electromechanical Design, Thermal, Contamination and Coatings, Manufacturing and Integration and Test — $728.5M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- 200106!000121!1700!F7004 !marine Corps Logistics Base !M6700499C0002 !a!n!*!n!p00015 !20010228!20080930!041014242!041014242!139691877!n!honeywell Technology Solutions!7000 Columbia Gateway Driv!columbia !md!21046!35000!031!12!jacksonville !duval !florida !+000004292865!n!n!000000000000!j049!maint & Repair of Eq/Maintenance & Repair Shop EQ !a4a!combat Vehicles !2000!NOT Discernable or Classified !811310!*!*!3! ! !C!*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !A !N!J!2!006!B! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $670.1M (Department of Defense)
- Mission Operations Management Services (moms) — $623.8M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →