NASA's $1.04B Mission Systems Operations Contract awarded to KBR Wyle Services, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $1,039,930,238 ($1.0B)
Contractor: KBR Wyle Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2018-01-02
End Date: 2026-04-30
Contract Duration: 3,040 days
Daily Burn Rate: $342.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: IGF::CT::IGFMSOC FPDS-NG MISSION SYSTEMS OPERATIONS CONTRACT (MSOC)
Place of Performance
Location: HOUSTON, HARRIS County, TEXAS, 77058
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $1.04 billion to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC for work described as: IGF::CT::IGFMSOC FPDS-NG MISSION SYSTEMS OPERATIONS CONTRACT (MSOC) Key points: 1. Contract value exceeds $1 billion over its duration. 2. KBR Wyle Services, LLC is the sole awardee. 3. The contract supports R&D in physical, engineering, and life sciences. 4. Full and open competition was utilized for this award.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee, which allows for flexibility but requires careful monitoring of performance and costs to ensure value. The total award value is substantial, suggesting significant scope.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust price discovery process. This method generally leads to more competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for advanced research and development, aiming for technological advancements with potential long-term benefits.
Public Impact
Supports critical research and development for NASA's missions. Potential for technological breakthroughs in physical, engineering, and life sciences. Long-term contract duration suggests ongoing and significant operational support.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee contracts can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
- Sole awardee may limit future competitive opportunities if performance is exceptional.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Supports critical R&D for a major government agency.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences sector. Spending in this area is crucial for innovation and national competitiveness, with significant government investment typically seen.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates the awardee is KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC, a large business. There is no explicit indication of small business participation in this specific contract award.
Oversight & Accountability
NASA's Inspector General likely provides oversight for such a large and critical contract, ensuring compliance with terms and efficient use of funds.
Related Government Programs
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in a Cost Plus Award Fee structure.
- Long contract duration requires continuous monitoring.
- Lack of explicit small business subcontracting information.
- Dependence on a single large contractor for critical operations.
Tags
research-and-development-in-the-physical, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, tx, definitive-contract, billion-dollar
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $1.04 billion to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC. IGF::CT::IGFMSOC FPDS-NG MISSION SYSTEMS OPERATIONS CONTRACT (MSOC)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $1.04 billion.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2018-01-02. End: 2026-04-30.
What specific research and development areas are prioritized under this contract, and how do they align with NASA's strategic goals?
The contract broadly covers 'Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)'. Specific priorities would be detailed in task orders and statements of work, driven by NASA's evolving mission objectives, such as space exploration, aeronautics advancements, and scientific discovery. Alignment is expected through direct support of ongoing and future NASA programs.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to assess KBR Wyle Services, LLC's performance and determine award fees?
Key performance indicators for a contract of this nature would likely include technical performance metrics, adherence to schedules, cost control effectiveness, and successful delivery of research outcomes. Award fees are typically tied to exceeding baseline performance expectations, requiring clear, measurable, and objective criteria defined in the contract's award fee plan.
How does the Cost Plus Award Fee structure incentivize efficiency and innovation compared to other contract types for R&D services?
The Cost Plus Award Fee structure incentivizes efficiency by reimbursing allowable costs while encouraging innovation and superior performance through the potential for significant award fees. This differs from fixed-price contracts, which offer less flexibility for R&D, and cost-plus-incentive-fee contracts, which have more defined cost targets and sharing arrangements.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: NNJ16100117R
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: KBR, Inc.
Address: 8120 MAPLE LAWN BLVD, FULTON, MD, 20759
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $1,114,264,536
Exercised Options: $1,046,684,137
Current Obligation: $1,039,930,238
Actual Outlays: $830,365,337
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 480
Total Subaward Amount: $331,907,200
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2018-01-02
Current End Date: 2026-04-30
Potential End Date: 2026-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-01
More Contracts from KBR Wyle Services, LLC
- Bioastronautics Contract-Activities for the Health &productivity of Crews Working and Living in Space — $1.5B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Acquire Engineering Services and Related Services to MSD and Related Organizations Throughout Gsfc, AS Required, for the Formulation, Design, Development, Fabrication, Integration, Testing, Verification, and Operations of Space Flight and Ground System Hardware and Software, Including Development and Validation of NEW Technologies to Enable Future Space and Science Missions. the Engineering Areas of Emphasis ARE Multidisciplinary With Concentration in the Mechanical Engineering Areas of Materials, Structural Analysis and Loads, Mechanical Design, Electromechanical Design, Thermal, Contamination and Coatings, Manufacturing and Integration and Test — $728.5M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- 200106!000121!1700!F7004 !marine Corps Logistics Base !M6700499C0002 !a!n!*!n!p00015 !20010228!20080930!041014242!041014242!139691877!n!honeywell Technology Solutions!7000 Columbia Gateway Driv!columbia !md!21046!35000!031!12!jacksonville !duval !florida !+000004292865!n!n!000000000000!j049!maint & Repair of Eq/Maintenance & Repair Shop EQ !a4a!combat Vehicles !2000!NOT Discernable or Classified !811310!*!*!3! ! !C!*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !A !N!J!2!006!B! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $670.1M (Department of Defense)
- Mission Operations Management Services (moms) — $623.8M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Other Functions This IS a NEW Procurement Requirement. the Name of This Procurement IS the Omnibus Multidiscipline Engineering Services (omes). the Principal Purpose of This Contract IS to Provide Multidiscipline Engineering Support Services and Related Work to EED, Istd, SED, MSD, Mesa, Jpss, and Related Organizations, AS Required, for the Study, Design, Systems Engineering, Development, Fabrication, Integration, Testing, Verification, and Operations of Space Flight, Airborne, and Ground System Hardware and Software, Including Development and Validation of NEW Technologies to Enable Future Space and Science Missions.to This END, the Contractor Shall Provide On/Off-Site Multidiscipline Engineering Services, Pursuant to Task Assignments Issued by the Contracting Officer. These Services Shall Include the Personnel, Facilities, and Materials (unless Otherwise Provided by the Government) to Accomplish the Tasks. Task Assignments Will BE Issued to Perform Services in the Following Areas for Components, Subsystems, Systems, Science Instruments, and Spacecraft, Suborbitalcraft (E.G., Aircraft, Sounding Rockets, Uavs, Balloons), Including Attached Shuttle Payloads, Free-Flying Spacecraft, Suborbitalcraft Payloads, and Space Station Payloads AS Well AS Ground Support Equipment, Simulators, Non-Flight Models, and Prototypes; Candidate, Feasibility, and Systems Definition Studies; Project Management; Systems Engineering; Analysis; Preliminary Design; Detailed Design; Fabrication; Assembly; Integration; Test and Verification; Test Instrumentation; Data Systems Management; Launch and Post-Launch Operations; Research and Technology Unique to System Development; Parts and Materials; Documentation; Maintenance; Sustaining Engineering; Configuration Management; Performance Assurance; Systems Safety; and Contamination Control — $607.4M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →