DHS awards $3.2M engineering support contract to Goldbelt Integrated Logistics Services, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,221,042 ($3.2M)

Contractor: Goldbelt Integrated Logistics Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2024-11-26

End Date: 2025-11-30

Contract Duration: 369 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.7K/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR ALC PRODUCT LINES.

Place of Performance

Location: CHESAPEAKE, CHESAPEAKE CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23320

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $3.2 million to GOLDBELT INTEGRATED LOGISTICS SERVICES, LLC for work described as: ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR ALC PRODUCT LINES. Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis, indicating predictable costs for the government. 2. Competition level is 'Competed under SAP', suggesting a streamlined procurement process. 3. Contract duration of 369 days provides a defined period for service delivery. 4. Services are categorized under Engineering Services (NAICS 541330). 5. The contract is a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or similar vehicle. 6. The awardee, Goldbelt Integrated Logistics Services, LLC, is a known entity in government contracting. 7. The contract is not set aside for small businesses, indicating a broader competition pool.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.2 million for one year of engineering support appears reasonable, especially considering the specialized nature of engineering services for product lines. Benchmarking against similar contracts for engineering support within DHS or other agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the firm-fixed-price structure helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. Without specific deliverables or scope details, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the price point is within expected ranges for such services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was 'Competed under SAP' (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), which typically involves a limited number of bidders and a less extensive solicitation process than full and open competition. While this can lead to faster award times, it may not always yield the lowest possible price due to reduced competitive pressure. The exact number of bidders is not specified, but SAP generally implies a smaller pool than full and open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition under SAP may mean taxpayers are not benefiting from the absolute lowest price achievable through a broader bidding process. However, it can also represent a balance between cost and timely acquisition of necessary services.

Public Impact

The U.S. Coast Guard (part of DHS) benefits from specialized engineering support for its product lines. This contract ensures the continued operational readiness and maintenance of critical Coast Guard assets. Services are likely delivered in Virginia, where the agency's presence is significant. The contract supports the technical workforce involved in engineering and logistics for the Coast Guard.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited price discovery due to competition under SAP.
Scope creep could be a risk if not managed tightly within the firm-fixed-price structure.
Dependence on a single contractor for specialized engineering support could pose continuity risks if not managed proactively.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Award to an established contractor suggests a degree of confidence in their capabilities.
Delivery order structure implies alignment with a broader strategic procurement vehicle.

Sector Analysis

Engineering services are a critical component of the defense and public safety sectors, supporting the development, maintenance, and modernization of complex systems and infrastructure. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise. This contract fits within the broader landscape of government support services, where agencies like the Department of Homeland Security rely on external expertise to augment their internal capabilities for specific product lines.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor is there an indication of specific small business subcontracting requirements in the provided data. This suggests that the competition was open to all eligible contractors, including large businesses. The absence of a small business set-aside means that opportunities for small business participation may be limited unless Goldbelt Integrated Logistics Services, LLC proactively includes them in their subcontracting efforts.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the U.S. Coast Guard's program management and contracting offices within the Department of Homeland Security. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific performance metrics and oversight activities are internal to the agency.

Related Government Programs

Department of Homeland Security - General Operations
U.S. Coast Guard - Asset Maintenance
Engineering Services Contracts
Logistics Support Services

Risk Flags

Limited competition may impact price.
Contract duration is relatively short (approx. 1 year).
Specific product lines supported are not detailed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $3.2 million to GOLDBELT INTEGRATED LOGISTICS SERVICES, LLC. ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR ALC PRODUCT LINES.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GOLDBELT INTEGRATED LOGISTICS SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Coast Guard).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-11-26. End: 2025-11-30.

What is the track record of Goldbelt Integrated Logistics Services, LLC with the Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Coast Guard?

Goldbelt Integrated Logistics Services, LLC has a history of contracting with various U.S. government agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security and its components like the U.S. Coast Guard. Analyzing their past performance on similar engineering support or logistics contracts would reveal their reliability, quality of service, and adherence to contract terms. Specific data on past performance ratings, any contract disputes, or successful project completions would provide a clearer picture of their capabilities and suitability for this current award. A review of their contract history might also indicate if they have previously supported the specific product lines mentioned in this contract.

How does the $3.2 million contract value compare to similar engineering support contracts awarded by the U.S. Coast Guard?

The $3.2 million contract value for one year of engineering support services for specific product lines needs to be benchmarked against comparable contracts. Factors such as the complexity of the product lines, the required level of engineering expertise, and the duration of support are critical for comparison. If the U.S. Coast Guard has awarded similar contracts for specialized engineering support in the past year, comparing the per-diem rates, total contract values, and scope of work would indicate if this award represents good value. Without access to a detailed database of comparable contracts, it's difficult to definitively state if $3.2 million is high or low, but it appears to be a moderate sum for specialized engineering services over a year.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Primary risks include potential scope creep, contractor performance issues, and reliance on a single vendor for critical support. Given the firm-fixed-price nature, scope creep is a significant risk if the contract's statement of work is not precisely defined and managed. Contractor performance issues could impact the operational readiness of Coast Guard product lines. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust contract management by the U.S. Coast Guard, clear definition of deliverables, performance monitoring, and potentially incorporating incentive or penalty clauses if applicable. The limited competition aspect also presents a risk of not achieving the best possible price.

How effective is the 'Competed under SAP' (Simplified Acquisition Procedures) approach for acquiring these engineering services?

Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) are designed for purchases up to a certain threshold (currently $250,000, but can be higher for certain agencies/circumstances) and aim to streamline the procurement process, making it faster and less burdensome than full and open competition. For engineering services valued at $3.2 million, this suggests the contract might be a delivery order against a larger IDIQ contract that was competed under SAP, or that the agency has specific authority to use SAP for this value. The effectiveness hinges on whether SAP allowed for adequate competition to ensure fair pricing while still achieving timely acquisition. It can be effective for routine or well-defined services but may limit price competition compared to broader solicitations.

What is the historical spending pattern for engineering support services by the U.S. Coast Guard in this category?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for engineering support services by the U.S. Coast Guard, particularly for similar product lines or asset classes, is crucial for context. This involves examining annual budgets allocated to such services, the number and value of contracts awarded in this category over the past several years, and the primary contractors utilized. Significant year-over-year increases or decreases in spending could indicate shifts in operational priorities, asset lifecycle management strategies, or changes in contracting approaches. Understanding this pattern helps assess whether the current $3.2 million award is consistent with historical investment or represents a new trend.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 860 GREENBRIER CIR STE 405, CHESAPEAKE, VA, 23320

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,221,042

Exercised Options: $3,221,042

Current Obligation: $3,221,042

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70Z03825DB0000001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline