Coast Guard Aviation Acquisition Support Contract Awarded to Archimedes Global, Inc. for $3.6M

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,633,785 ($3.6M)

Contractor: Archimedes Global, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2025-09-30

End Date: 2027-03-31

Contract Duration: 547 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CONTRACTOR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, AND INTEGRATED LOGISTICS CONTRACTOR SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE UNITED STATES COAST GUARD OFFICE OF AVIATION ACQUISITION (CG-931)

Place of Performance

Location: HANOVER, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 21076

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $3.6 million to ARCHIMEDES GLOBAL, INC for work described as: CONTRACTOR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, AND INTEGRATED LOGISTICS CONTRACTOR SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE UNITED STATES COAST GUARD OFFICE OF AVIATION ACQUISITION (CG-931) Key points: 1. Contract provides essential program management and logistics support for Coast Guard aviation acquisition. 2. Archimedes Global, Inc. secured this contract through full and open competition. 3. The contract duration extends over 1.5 years, indicating a medium-term need for these services. 4. Services are critical for the efficient acquisition and sustainment of Coast Guard aviation assets. 5. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide predictable spending. 6. This award represents a specific investment in the operational readiness of the Coast Guard's aviation fleet.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.6 million over approximately 1.5 years appears reasonable for specialized program management and logistics support services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for aviation acquisition support within the Department of Homeland Security or other defense agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests an expectation of cost control by the government. However, without detailed task breakdowns and market rate comparisons for specific roles, a definitive assessment of pricing efficiency is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' indicating a competitive process was initiated. The specific details of how many bidders participated and the evaluation criteria are not provided in the summary data. However, the 'full and open' designation generally suggests a robust competition, which is favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive offers.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process helps ensure taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down prices and encouraging innovative solutions from multiple offerors.

Public Impact

The United States Coast Guard benefits from enhanced program management and logistics for its aviation fleet. Services delivered will support the acquisition and sustainment of critical aviation assets, improving operational capabilities. The primary geographic impact is within the operational areas served by the Coast Guard's aviation units. The contract supports a specialized workforce in program management, logistics, and aviation acquisition.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined and managed.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical support functions could pose a risk if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overruns.
Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive market for these services.
Contract duration is defined, providing a clear timeframe for service delivery.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically supporting the acquisition of physical assets (aviation) rather than pure research. The market for program management and logistics support services for government aviation programs is specialized, often involving contractors with deep expertise in defense and aerospace. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within the broader aerospace and defense services industry, where large contracts are common for platform acquisition and sustainment.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss and sb fields) is false for this specific award. This suggests that the prime contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific small business subcontracting goals explicitly stated in this summary. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses within the scope of this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically reside with the U.S. Coast Guard's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are embedded within the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though detailed performance metrics may not always be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Coast Guard Aviation Programs
Department of Homeland Security Acquisition Support
Defense Contract Management Agency Services
Aerospace Program Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract type: Firm Fixed Price
Competition level: Full and Open
Contract duration: Medium-term (547 days)
Contract value: Moderate ($3.6M)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $3.6 million to ARCHIMEDES GLOBAL, INC. CONTRACTOR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, AND INTEGRATED LOGISTICS CONTRACTOR SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE UNITED STATES COAST GUARD OFFICE OF AVIATION ACQUISITION (CG-931)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ARCHIMEDES GLOBAL, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Coast Guard).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-30. End: 2027-03-31.

What is Archimedes Global, Inc.'s track record with the U.S. Coast Guard and similar agencies?

Archimedes Global, Inc. has a history of providing various support services to government agencies, including the Department of Defense and Homeland Security. Their portfolio often includes program management, logistics, and technical support. Specific to the U.S. Coast Guard, their past performance would be detailed in contract databases, showing previous awards, contract values, and performance evaluations. A review of these records would indicate their experience level and success in delivering similar services, which is a key factor in assessing their capability for this current aviation acquisition support contract. Their ability to consistently meet performance standards and manage complex projects is crucial for ensuring the success of the Coast Guard's aviation acquisition efforts.

How does the value of this contract compare to similar aviation acquisition support contracts?

The contract value of $3.6 million over approximately 1.5 years (547 days) translates to an estimated annual value of roughly $2.4 million. To benchmark this, one would compare it to other contracts awarded by the U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security, or Department of Defense for program management, logistics, and acquisition support specifically for aviation platforms. Factors such as the complexity of the aircraft, the scope of acquisition phases supported (e.g., initial development, sustainment planning), and the level of technical expertise required would influence comparability. Without access to a broader dataset of similar contracts, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents a high, low, or average value. However, for specialized support services, this value range is not uncommon.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract and how are they mitigated?

Key risks include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor, such as delays in deliverables or failure to meet quality standards, and the risk of cost overruns if the firm-fixed-price (FFP) structure is not adequately managed. Scope creep, where the requirements expand beyond the initial agreement, is another common risk. Mitigation strategies include robust contract oversight by the U.S. Coast Guard, clear definition of performance work statements (PWS), regular performance reviews, and adherence to the FFP terms which place the cost risk on the contractor. The contractor's past performance record also serves as a risk indicator; a strong history suggests lower performance risk. The defined contract duration also limits the exposure period.

How effective is the firm-fixed-price contract type in ensuring value for money in this context?

The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally considered effective in ensuring value for money for services where the scope of work is well-defined and unlikely to change significantly. It shifts the cost risk to the contractor, incentivizing them to manage their expenses efficiently to maximize profit. For program management and logistics support, where tasks can be clearly delineated, FFP provides cost predictability for the government. However, if the scope is inherently uncertain or prone to change, FFP can sometimes lead to contractors building in higher contingency costs, or it may necessitate costly change orders. In this case, for supporting aviation acquisition, the FFP suggests a clear understanding of the required support services.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar aviation acquisition support services by the U.S. Coast Guard?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for similar aviation acquisition support services by the U.S. Coast Guard would involve examining past contracts awarded for program management, logistics, engineering, and technical support related to their aircraft fleets. This would include looking at the number of contracts awarded, their values, the duration of these contracts, and the types of services rendered. Trends might reveal whether the Coast Guard increasingly relies on external contractors for these functions, whether spending has been increasing or decreasing, and which contractors have been historically successful. Understanding these patterns provides context for the current $3.6 million award, indicating if it aligns with previous investment levels or represents a shift in strategy.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 70Z02325R912729211

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1745 DORSEY RD, HANOVER, MD, 21076

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,633,785

Exercised Options: $3,633,785

Current Obligation: $3,633,785

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QRCA24DV008

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline