DHS awards $74.7K facilities support contract to ASRC Federal Field Services for 30 days

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $74,747 ($74.7K)

Contractor: Asrc Federal Field Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2026-04-02

End Date: 2026-05-02

Contract Duration: 30 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FOSS BRIDGE CONTRACT

Place of Performance

Location: BELTSVILLE, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20705

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $74,746.68 to ASRC FEDERAL FIELD SERVICES, LLC for work described as: FOSS BRIDGE CONTRACT Key points: 1. Contract value appears low for a facilities support service, suggesting a narrow scope or short duration. 2. Sole-source award limits opportunities for competitive pricing and potentially higher value. 3. Short performance period (30 days) may indicate an urgent need or a bridge contract. 4. Lack of competition raises concerns about price reasonableness and potential overpayment. 5. The contract is for facilities support services, a critical but often overlooked area of government operations. 6. The award is a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract, though details are not provided.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $74,746.68 for a 30-day period is difficult to benchmark without knowing the specific services rendered. However, given the sole-source nature and short duration, it's challenging to assess value for money. If this is a standalone contract, the per-day cost is approximately $2,492. This rate needs to be compared against market rates for similar facilities support services in Maryland to determine if it represents a fair price. Without more information on the scope of work, a definitive value assessment is not possible.

Cost Per Unit: $2,492 per day (estimated)

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed. This approach is typically used when only one responsible source is available or when there is a compelling justification for other than full and open competition. The lack of competition means that the government did not receive offers from multiple vendors, which can limit price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs than if the contract had been competed.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not be receiving the best possible price due to the absence of competitive bidding. This award mechanism bypasses the opportunity to leverage market forces to secure a more cost-effective solution.

Public Impact

Federal Law Enforcement Training Center personnel and operations benefit from uninterrupted facilities support. Ensures the continued functionality and maintenance of critical training facilities. The services are geographically focused within Maryland, supporting federal operations in that state. Potential for a small number of direct or indirect workforce implications related to the specific services provided.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award limits price competition and taxpayer value.
Short duration may indicate a stop-gap measure, potentially leading to recurring sole-source awards.
Lack of detailed scope of work makes it difficult to assess performance expectations and contractor capabilities.

Positive Signals

Award to an established contractor (ASRC Federal) may suggest a degree of reliability.
Fixed-price contract type can provide cost certainty if the scope is well-defined.
The contract supports essential facilities operations for a federal law enforcement training center.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) encompass a broad range of services related to the operation and maintenance of buildings and grounds. This sector includes services like general building maintenance, janitorial services, pest control, and landscaping. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services across numerous agencies and installations. Benchmarking this specific contract's value is challenging without a detailed scope, but the daily rate suggests a focused service rather than comprehensive facility management.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not competed and there is no indication of a small business set-aside or subcontracting plan. Therefore, it does not appear to directly benefit small businesses through this specific award. The impact on the broader small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless ASRC Federal Field Services utilizes small business subcontractors, which is not specified.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Homeland Security's contracting and program management offices. As a delivery order, it is likely governed by the terms of a parent IDIQ contract, which would have its own oversight mechanisms. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature and the brevity of the performance period. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Law Enforcement Training Center Operations
Department of Homeland Security Facilities Management
General Services Administration (GSA) Facilities Contracts

Risk Flags

Sole-source award raises concerns about price reasonableness.
Lack of detailed scope of work hinders performance and value assessment.
Short contract duration may indicate a temporary solution or potential for recurring sole-source awards.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $74,746.68 to ASRC FEDERAL FIELD SERVICES, LLC. FOSS BRIDGE CONTRACT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ASRC FEDERAL FIELD SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Federal Law Enforcement Training Center).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $74,746.68.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-02. End: 2026-05-02.

What specific facilities support services are being provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Facilities Support Services' under NAICS code 561210. However, the specific services are not detailed. This category can encompass a wide range of activities, including but not limited to, maintenance, repair, custodial services, groundskeeping, security system maintenance, and utility management. Without a detailed Statement of Work (SOW), it is impossible to ascertain the precise nature of the services rendered. This lack of specificity makes it difficult to evaluate the contractor's performance, the appropriateness of the price, and the overall value delivered to the government.

How does the daily rate of approximately $2,492 compare to market rates for similar facilities support services in Maryland?

Benchmarking the daily rate of $2,492 requires a detailed understanding of the specific services provided. Facilities support is a broad category. If the services include specialized maintenance or comprehensive facility management, this rate might be reasonable or even low. However, if it covers basic janitorial or groundskeeping, it could be high. Market research for similar contracts in Maryland, considering factors like contract size, duration, and service complexity, is necessary for a proper comparison. Given the sole-source nature, it's plausible the government did not secure the most competitive market rate.

What is the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

The data states the contract was 'NOT COMPETED,' implying a sole-source award. Government regulations permit sole-source awards under specific circumstances, such as when only one responsible source can satisfy the agency's needs, or in cases of urgent and compelling need where competition is not feasible. Without further documentation from the Department of Homeland Security, the precise justification remains unknown. This lack of competition limits the government's ability to ensure it is obtaining the best value and price.

What is the expected impact of this short-duration contract on the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center's operations?

A 30-day contract, valued at $74,746.68, suggests it's intended to cover an immediate or short-term need. This could be to bridge a gap between longer-term contracts, address an unforeseen requirement, or provide specialized support for a specific event or project. The impact on operations depends heavily on the criticality of the services. If these are essential maintenance or operational support functions, their timely and effective delivery is crucial for the uninterrupted functioning of the training center. The short duration might also indicate a pilot program or a test of a specific service.

Is ASRC Federal Field Services, LLC a known provider of facilities support services to the federal government, and what is their track record?

ASRC Federal Field Services, LLC is a known entity providing various services to the federal government, including logistics, IT, and base operations support. While the provided data doesn't detail their specific track record for facilities support services under this particular contract, their presence in the federal contracting space suggests experience. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing their past performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS reports), contract history, and any past issues or commendations related to similar service contracts to gauge their reliability and capability.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center?

The provided data only includes details for this specific $74,746.68 delivery order. To understand historical spending patterns for facilities support services at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC), one would need to access historical contract databases (like FPDS or USASpending.gov) and filter for FLETC, the relevant NAICS codes (e.g., 561210), and contract types. Analyzing past awards, including their values, durations, competition levels, and awarded contractors, would reveal trends, identify key service providers, and indicate whether spending has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing over time.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Arctic Slope Regional Corporation

Address: 7000 MUIRKIRK MEADOWS DR STE 100, BELTSVILLE, MD, 20705

Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $74,747

Exercised Options: $74,747

Current Obligation: $74,747

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70LCHS25DPFB00003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline