GSA awards $12,930 contract for concentrated detergent, highlighting a niche need for specialized cleaning supplies

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,930 ($12.9K)

Contractor: Premier & Companies, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-09

End Date: 2026-05-09

Contract Duration: 30 days

Daily Burn Rate: $431/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: DETERGENT,GENERAL PSE: CORROSION INHIBITEDCONCENTRATED, ANIONIC DETERGENT FOR MANUAL AND ULTRASONIC CLEANING. TWELVE (12) DISPENSER BOXESEACH CONTAINING FIFTY (50) EACH, ONE-HALF (1/2)OUNCE PACKETS PER BOX).

Place of Performance

Location: NEW YORK, NEW YORK County, NEW YORK, 10001

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $12,930 to PREMIER & COMPANIES, INC. for work described as: DETERGENT,GENERAL PSE: CORROSION INHIBITEDCONCENTRATED, ANIONIC DETERGENT FOR MANUAL AND ULTRASONIC CLEANING. TWELVE (12) DISPENSER BOXESEACH CONTAINING FIFTY (50) EACH, ONE-HALF (1/2)OUNCE PACKETS PER BOX). Key points: 1. The contract value is relatively small, suggesting a specific, limited requirement rather than a broad-scale procurement. 2. Competition dynamics appear favorable given the contract was competed, though the number of bidders is not specified. 3. The short duration of the contract (30 days) indicates an immediate or short-term need. 4. The product is a specialized, concentrated detergent for manual and ultrasonic cleaning, suggesting a specific application. 5. The packaging specifies dispenser boxes with individual packets, indicating a focus on controlled usage and ease of distribution. 6. The award to Premier & Companies, Inc. suggests a market with established suppliers for such specialized chemical products.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $12,930 for a 30-day supply of specialized detergent is difficult to benchmark without more detailed product specifications and market data. However, the unit cost for the 1/2 ounce packets can be inferred. Given the small quantity and specialized nature, the pricing is likely fair for the specific application, but a broader market comparison is not feasible with the provided data. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was competed under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating that it was open to a broad range of potential offerors. While the exact number of bidders is not provided, the use of SAP generally encourages competition for procurements below certain dollar thresholds. This method aims to ensure fair and reasonable pricing through market forces.

Taxpayer Impact: Competition under SAP for this procurement helps ensure that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by obtaining the best possible price for the required specialized detergent.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring specialized cleaning solutions for sensitive equipment or specific industrial processes will benefit from this contract. The contract delivers concentrated, corrosion-inhibited detergent in pre-portioned packets, ensuring consistent application and reducing waste. The primary geographic impact is likely within the New York region, where the contractor is located, but the supplies may be distributed nationally. The contract supports a niche segment of the chemical supply industry, potentially involving specialized manufacturing and distribution roles.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed product specifications makes it hard to assess if this is the most cost-effective solution available.
The limited contract duration might necessitate frequent re-procurement, increasing administrative burden.
No information on environmental impact or biodegradability of the detergent is provided.
The specific application for 'corrosion inhibited' detergent suggests a need that might be addressed by multiple chemical formulations.

Positive Signals

The contract was competed, indicating an effort to achieve a fair price.
The use of pre-portioned packets suggests efficient usage and waste reduction.
The firm fixed-price contract provides budget certainty.
The supplier, Premier & Companies, Inc., is likely experienced in providing such specialized chemical products.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader chemical manufacturing and distribution sector, specifically for industrial cleaning agents. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 332216 (Saw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing) appears to be a misclassification for a chemical product; a more appropriate code might be in the chemical manufacturing or wholesale trade categories. The market for industrial cleaning supplies is competitive, with various suppliers offering specialized formulations for different applications. Benchmarking this specific product's value is challenging without detailed chemical composition and application requirements.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract included a small business set-aside. The value of the contract is within the simplified acquisition threshold, making it accessible to small businesses. However, without specific subcontracting plans or set-aside provisions, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is not explicitly defined, though it provides an opportunity for small businesses to compete.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is a purchase order issued by the General Services Administration (GSA), which is a primary federal agency for procurement. Oversight is typically managed through GSA's Federal Acquisition Service. Transparency is provided through federal procurement databases where contract awards are recorded. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud or mismanagement were suspected.

Related Government Programs

General Services Administration (GSA) Supply Schedules
Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative (FSSI)
Chemical and Cleaning Supplies Procurement
Industrial Maintenance and Operations Supplies

Risk Flags

NAICS Code Misclassification
Potentially High Unit Cost
Short Contract Duration

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $12,930 to PREMIER & COMPANIES, INC.. DETERGENT,GENERAL PSE: CORROSION INHIBITEDCONCENTRATED, ANIONIC DETERGENT FOR MANUAL AND ULTRASONIC CLEANING. TWELVE (12) DISPENSER BOXESEACH CONTAINING FIFTY (50) EACH, ONE-HALF (1/2)OUNCE PACKETS PER BOX).

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PREMIER & COMPANIES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12,930.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2026-05-09.

What is the specific application and required performance standard for this concentrated detergent?

The data indicates the detergent is 'DETERGENT,GENERAL PSE: CORROSION INHIBITED CONCENTRATED, ANIONIC DETERGENT FOR MANUAL AND ULTRASONIC CLEANING.' This suggests it is intended for cleaning sensitive equipment or surfaces where corrosion prevention is critical, likely in industrial or laboratory settings. The 'PSE' designation might refer to a specific government standard or product series. The requirement for manual and ultrasonic cleaning implies versatility in application methods. Without further details on the specific materials being cleaned or the environmental conditions, the precise performance standard remains undefined, but the 'corrosion inhibited' aspect is a key performance indicator.

How does the unit cost of the 1/2 ounce packets compare to similar industrial cleaning agents?

The total contract value is $12,930 for 12 dispenser boxes, each containing 50 packets, totaling 600 packets. This means each packet costs approximately $21.55 ($12,930 / 600 packets). This unit cost appears exceptionally high for a single-use packet of detergent. Typical industrial cleaning solutions, even specialized ones, are usually priced much lower per unit volume. This high unit cost suggests either a very potent or highly specialized formulation, extremely small packet size relative to concentration, or potentially an inflated price. Further investigation into the chemical composition and competitive market pricing for similar concentrated, corrosion-inhibited anionic detergents is warranted.

What is the track record of Premier & Companies, Inc. in supplying federal agencies?

Information on Premier & Companies, Inc.'s specific track record with federal agencies is not detailed in the provided data. However, their ability to win this contract, even if competed under SAP, suggests they are a registered vendor capable of meeting federal procurement requirements. A deeper dive into federal procurement databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov) would be necessary to assess their past performance, contract history, value of awards, and any performance feedback or disputes. Without this, it's difficult to gauge their reliability and experience beyond this single award.

What is the potential risk associated with the misclassification of the NAICS code?

The provided data lists NAICS code 332216 (Saw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing) for this contract, which is clearly a misclassification for a chemical detergent product. This error could indicate a lack of diligence in the procurement process or data entry. While it may not directly impact the delivery of the detergent itself, it can obscure the true nature of the procurement in government spending databases, making it harder to analyze spending patterns within the correct industry sector (e.g., chemical manufacturing or wholesale trade). It could also affect future market research and competition if agencies rely on inaccurate NAICS codes for outreach.

How does the short 30-day duration impact the overall value and efficiency of this procurement?

The 30-day contract duration suggests an urgent or short-term need for the specialized detergent. While a firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for this period, the short duration may lead to inefficiencies. It could necessitate frequent re-solicitation processes, increasing administrative overhead for the GSA. Furthermore, it limits the opportunity for the government to potentially negotiate better pricing through longer-term commitments or larger volume orders, which might be possible if the need were more enduring. This suggests the requirement might be for a specific, time-bound project or an interim solution.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Cutlery and Handtool Manufacturing › Saw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: HAND TOOLS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 525 WINDSOR DR, SECAUCUS, NJ, 07094

Business Categories: Category Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,930

Exercised Options: $12,930

Current Obligation: $12,930

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline