GSA awards $13,264 contract for urethane foam cushioning material to FP WOLL & CO

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,265 ($13.3K)

Contractor: FP Woll & CO

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-10

End Date: 2026-05-01

Contract Duration: 21 days

Daily Burn Rate: $632/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CUSHIONING MATERIAL, PACKAGING: IAW PPP-C-1120C, DATED JULY 20, 1993. CUSHIONING MATERIAL, UNCOMPRESSED BOUND FIBER FOR PKG ITEM NAME CUSHIONING MATERIAL, PKG I.A.W. TYPE: III - MEDIUM FIRM CLASS: A - WATER RESISTANT MATERIAL GRADE: 3 - STANDARD MATE

Place of Performance

Location: PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA County, PENNSYLVANIA, 19116

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $13,264.56 to FP WOLL & CO for work described as: CUSHIONING MATERIAL, PACKAGING: IAW PPP-C-1120C, DATED JULY 20, 1993. CUSHIONING MATERIAL, UNCOMPRESSED BOUND FIBER FOR PKG ITEM NAME CUSHIONING MATERIAL, PKG I.A.W. TYPE: III - MEDIUM FIRM CLASS: A - WATER RESISTANT MATERIAL GRADE: 3 - STANDARD MATE Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive market for the specified cushioning material. 2. The contract is a delivery order under a larger agreement, indicating ongoing procurement needs for packaging supplies. 3. Fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. 4. The material specified (urethane and other foam) is a standard industrial product, likely with established market pricing. 5. The short duration of 21 days for delivery suggests an immediate or urgent need for the cushioning material. 6. The contract is not set aside for small businesses, implying larger firms participated or were eligible.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $13,264.56 for cushioning material appears reasonable for a specific delivery order. Benchmarking against similar GSA procurements for packaging materials would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm fixed-price structure is a positive indicator for cost control. Without detailed specifications on quantity and quality, a definitive value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the competitive award process suggests fair market pricing was sought.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' which typically means that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This indicates a healthy level of competition for this particular requirement. The specific details of 'after exclusion of sources' might warrant further investigation to understand if any specific types of vendors were initially excluded before the broader competition was opened.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process generally leads to better pricing for taxpayers by encouraging multiple vendors to offer their best terms.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring packaging and cushioning materials for shipping sensitive items will benefit from this contract. The contract ensures the availability of specific types of urethane and foam cushioning material (Type III, Medium Firm, Class A, Grade 3). The delivery is specified for Pennsylvania, indicating a localized geographic impact for this particular order. The manufacturing of urethane and foam products supports the industrial sector and associated workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific quantity and detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to fully assess value for money.
The 'after exclusion of sources' clause requires clarification to ensure maximum competition was achieved.
Limited duration of the contract might indicate a reactive procurement rather than strategic planning.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive marketplace.
Firm fixed-price contract type limits government financial risk.
The material specified is a standard industrial product, likely readily available.
The contract is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), a reputable procurement agency.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Urethane and Other Foam Product Manufacturing sector, a segment of the broader chemical and materials industry. The market for packaging materials is substantial, driven by e-commerce and the need for product protection during transit. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing GSA's historical data on similar packaging material procurements and broader federal spending on industrial supplies.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, as indicated by 'sb': false. This suggests that the competition was open to all responsible bidders, including large corporations. There is no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses within the provided data. The impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless small businesses are key suppliers to the prime contractor, FP WOLL & CO.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), which has established oversight mechanisms for federal procurement. Oversight would typically involve contract administration, performance monitoring, and compliance checks. Transparency is facilitated through public contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

GSA Federal Acquisition Service
Packaging and Packing Supplies
Urethane Foam Products
Industrial Supplies Procurement

Risk Flags

Potential for supply chain disruption due to short delivery window.
Quality assurance of material specifications (IAW PPP-C-1120C) needs verification.
Limited contract duration may not reflect full program needs.
Clarity needed on 'after exclusion of sources' to ensure maximum competition.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $13,264.56 to FP WOLL & CO. CUSHIONING MATERIAL, PACKAGING: IAW PPP-C-1120C, DATED JULY 20, 1993. CUSHIONING MATERIAL, UNCOMPRESSED BOUND FIBER FOR PKG ITEM NAME CUSHIONING MATERIAL, PKG I.A.W. TYPE: III - MEDIUM FIRM CLASS: A - WATER RESISTANT MATERIAL GRADE: 3 - STANDARD MATE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FP WOLL & CO.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13,264.56.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-10. End: 2026-05-01.

What is the track record of FP WOLL & CO. with federal contracts?

Information regarding FP WOLL & CO.'s specific track record with federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data snippet. A comprehensive analysis would require querying federal procurement databases (like FPDS-NG) to identify past awards, contract performance history, any reported issues, and the types of goods or services they have previously supplied to the government. Understanding their past performance, including on-time delivery, quality compliance, and any disputes, is crucial for assessing reliability on this current contract.

How does the price of this cushioning material compare to market rates for similar products?

The provided data does not include specific unit pricing or quantity, making a direct price comparison difficult. However, the contract type (Firm Fixed Price) and the competitive award process suggest that the price was determined through market mechanisms. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify comparable urethane foam cushioning materials (e.g., Type III, Medium Firm, Class A, Grade 3) procured by other federal agencies or commercial entities around the same period. Analyzing GSA's historical data for similar packaging materials would also provide valuable context for assessing whether $13,264.56 represents a fair market value for the specified quantity and quality.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract?

Key risks include potential supply chain disruptions affecting FP WOLL & CO.'s ability to deliver within the short timeframe, quality control issues with the cushioning material not meeting the IAW PPP-C-1120C standard, and potential price volatility if this is part of a larger, longer-term need not fully captured by this delivery order. The 'after exclusion of sources' clause, while indicating competition, could also mask a risk if it unnecessarily limited the pool of potential bidders, potentially leading to suboptimal pricing or fewer innovative solutions.

How effective is the GSA in managing contracts for packaging materials?

The General Services Administration (GSA) is a primary agency for federal procurement and has extensive experience managing contracts for a wide range of supplies, including packaging materials. Their effectiveness is generally considered high due to established procurement processes, contract administration standards, and oversight mechanisms. However, the effectiveness for any specific contract, like this one for cushioning material, depends on factors such as the clarity of the statement of work, the diligence of contract officers, and the performance of the contractor. GSA's use of competitive bidding and fixed-price contracts aims to maximize effectiveness and value.

What is the historical spending pattern for urethane and foam product manufacturing by the GSA?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for urethane and foam product manufacturing by the GSA would require accessing and processing extensive procurement data over several fiscal years. This would involve filtering contracts by NAICS code (e.g., 326150), agency (GSA), and potentially by specific product descriptions or PSC codes related to foam and cushioning materials. Such an analysis could reveal trends in contract values, award volumes, dominant contractors, and average prices paid, providing context for the current $13,264.56 award.

Does the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' clause indicate potential issues with market availability?

The clause 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' typically means that after an initial phase where certain sources might have been excluded (perhaps due to specific requirements or initial market research), the competition was then opened broadly to all responsible sources. This is often used when there's a need for specialized products or services where only a limited number of vendors can meet the criteria, but the agency still wants to ensure the widest possible competition among those capable vendors. It doesn't necessarily indicate a fundamental market availability issue, but rather a structured approach to competition for specific needs, aiming to balance specialization with broad access.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Plastics Product Manufacturing › Urethane and Other Foam Product (except Polystyrene) Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: CONTAINERS/PACKAGING/PACKING SUPPL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 10060 SANDMEYER LN, PHILADELPHIA, PA, 19116

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,265

Exercised Options: $13,265

Current Obligation: $13,265

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSEA22D002X

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline