GSA awards $112K for office furniture in Alaska, with a 290-day duration

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $112,235 ($112.2K)

Contractor: Teknion LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-08-15

End Date: 2026-06-01

Contract Duration: 290 days

Daily Burn Rate: $387/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ANCHORAGE AK FO CYBER OPEN PLAN INITIAL AWARD

Place of Performance

Location: ANCHORAGE, ANCHORAGE County, ALASKA, 99501

State: Alaska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $112,235.01 to TEKNION LLC for work described as: ANCHORAGE AK FO CYBER OPEN PLAN INITIAL AWARD Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the contract type and duration, but specific performance metrics are not detailed. 2. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 3. Risk indicators are low, with a firm fixed-price contract and a defined period of performance. 4. Performance context is limited to the supply of office furniture, with no specific service delivery details. 5. Sector positioning is within the office furniture manufacturing and supply chain. 6. The contract's modest value suggests it is likely for a specific project or office setup.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $112,235.01 for office furniture is relatively small in the context of federal procurement. Without detailed specifications or comparison to similar large-scale office outfitting contracts, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm fixed-price structure generally provides cost certainty. Benchmarking against market rates for similar office furniture would be necessary for a more definitive assessment of pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. This typically leads to a more robust price discovery process and potentially better pricing for the government. The number of bidders is not specified, but the competitive nature suggests multiple entities vied for this award.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a market where contractors are incentivized to offer competitive prices to win awards.

Public Impact

Federal employees in Alaska will benefit from new or updated office furniture. The services delivered involve the procurement and likely delivery of office furniture. The geographic impact is specific to Alaska, likely serving a federal facility within the state. Workforce implications are minimal, primarily related to the installation or setup of the furniture.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for delays in delivery or installation impacting office readiness.
Quality of furniture may not meet long-term durability expectations if not adequately specified.
Limited scope for customization or specialized furniture needs under a standard award.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a fair market price.
Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Defined period of performance limits the government's exposure to cost overruns.

Sector Analysis

The office furniture sector is a mature market with numerous manufacturers and distributors. Federal spending in this area supports various government agencies' needs for workspace outfitting. This contract, valued at $112,235.01, represents a small portion of overall federal spending on office furnishings, likely catering to a specific office or facility upgrade within Alaska.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary contractor, TEKNION LLC, is likely a large business. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this award, though it is possible the prime contractor may engage small businesses for specific services like delivery or installation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, requiring delivery of specified goods within the agreed-upon timeframe and budget. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance monitoring details are not publicly available.

Related Government Programs

GSA Federal Supply Schedule Contracts
Office and Administrative Equipment Procurement
Government Furniture Contracts
Alaska Federal Procurement

Risk Flags

Potential for delivery delays
Quality assurance of furniture materials and construction
Adequacy of specifications for intended use

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $112,235.01 to TEKNION LLC. ANCHORAGE AK FO CYBER OPEN PLAN INITIAL AWARD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TEKNION LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $112,235.01.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-08-15. End: 2026-06-01.

What is the track record of TEKNION LLC in fulfilling federal contracts for office furniture?

TEKNION LLC has a history of receiving federal contracts, primarily through GSA schedules, for office furniture. Analyzing their past performance data, including on-time delivery rates, quality of goods provided, and any past disputes or contract modifications, would offer insight into their reliability. While this specific award is for a modest amount, their broader federal contracting history can indicate their capacity and experience in meeting government requirements. Further investigation into contract close-out data and any performance evaluations would provide a more comprehensive picture of their track record.

How does the price per unit for the office furniture compare to market rates or similar federal contracts?

The provided data does not include specific unit costs for the office furniture. To benchmark the value, one would need to compare the prices of individual furniture items (e.g., desks, chairs, filing cabinets) against GSA schedule pricing, commercial price lists, or data from recently awarded, comparable federal contracts for similar furniture. Given the firm fixed-price nature, the government has locked in a total cost, but understanding the underlying unit economics is crucial for assessing true value for money. Without itemized pricing, this comparison remains speculative.

What are the primary risks associated with this specific contract award?

The primary risks for this contract are relatively low due to its firm fixed-price nature and defined scope. Potential risks include delays in delivery or installation, which could impact the operational readiness of the affected federal office. There's also a risk related to the quality and durability of the furniture not meeting long-term needs if specifications were not sufficiently detailed or if the chosen products are not of the expected standard. However, the short duration (290 days) mitigates long-term performance risks. The contractor's financial stability and supply chain reliability are also implicit risks, though typically vetted during the procurement process.

How effective is full and open competition in ensuring competitive pricing for office furniture contracts of this size?

Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring competitive pricing, regardless of contract size. For a contract of this value ($112,235.01), it signals that multiple vendors were willing and able to compete, likely driving down prices compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario. The effectiveness is amplified when the solicitation clearly defines requirements and evaluation criteria, allowing vendors to accurately bid. While the number of bidders isn't specified, the process itself creates a pressure for competitive offers, benefiting the government's budget.

What is the historical spending pattern for office furniture by the General Services Administration in Alaska?

Historical spending data for office furniture by GSA specifically in Alaska would require a detailed analysis of past contract awards within that geographic region. GSA procures a vast range of goods and services, and office furniture is a recurring need. Examining prior awards for similar furniture needs, their values, contract types, and durations would reveal trends. This specific award suggests ongoing or recurring needs for furnishing federal spaces in Alaska. Understanding historical patterns can help GSA forecast future requirements and budget allocations more accurately.

Are there any specific performance metrics or deliverables outlined in this contract?

The provided data summary does not detail specific performance metrics or deliverables beyond the general description of 'Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing' and the award value. A full review of the contract document itself would be necessary to ascertain the exact specifications, delivery schedules, installation requirements, and any associated performance standards or quality assurance provisions. Typically, federal contracts include clauses for acceptance of goods, delivery timelines, and potentially warranties, which serve as implicit performance indicators.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QSMA25Q0032

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 350 FELLOWSHIP RD, MOUNT LAUREL, NJ, 08054

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $112,235

Exercised Options: $112,235

Current Obligation: $112,235

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSMA22A0005

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline