General Services Administration awards $31,254 per AWD SUV to RRDS INC under full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $31,254 ($31.3K)

Contractor: Rrds Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2026-08-06

Contract Duration: 120 days

Daily Burn Rate: $260/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: AWD SUV, CROSSOVER, COMPACT, 4 DR, 5 PASS, MIN 4500 LBS GVWR

Place of Performance

Location: IRVINE, ORANGE County, CALIFORNIA, 92618

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $31,254 to RRDS INC for work described as: AWD SUV, CROSSOVER, COMPACT, 4 DR, 5 PASS, MIN 4500 LBS GVWR Key points: 1. The contract value per unit appears competitive for a new AWD SUV with a minimum 4500 lbs GVWR. 2. Full and open competition suggests a robust market engagement, potentially leading to favorable pricing. 3. The short duration of 120 days for delivery indicates a focus on immediate fleet needs. 4. The contract is a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 336111 points to the automobile manufacturing sector. 6. The contract's fixed-price nature transfers risk to the contractor, RRDS INC.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The awarded price of $31,254 per AWD SUV is within a reasonable range for this type of vehicle, considering its specifications (4-door, 5-passenger, minimum 4500 lbs GVWR). Benchmarking against similar government procurements for comparable vehicles suggests this price point is competitive. The firm fixed-price contract structure further supports value by locking in costs and shifting performance risk to the contractor.

Cost Per Unit: $31,254

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of 10 bids suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement. A competitive bidding process typically drives down prices and encourages contractors to offer their best value propositions to secure the award.

Taxpayer Impact: The extensive competition for this vehicle procurement is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a lower overall cost compared to a sole-source or limited competition award. This process ensures that government funds are used efficiently by leveraging market forces.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring AWD SUVs for operational or logistical support will benefit from the availability of these vehicles. The delivery of these vehicles supports the operational readiness and mobility of various government departments. The contract is being executed within California, potentially impacting local dealerships or distribution networks. The procurement supports the automobile manufacturing sector, contributing to industry output and employment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for price escalation on future delivery orders if market conditions change significantly.
Dependence on RRDS INC's ability to meet the delivery timeline of 120 days.
Limited scope of this specific delivery order, with broader contract terms not detailed here.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating strong market interest and potential for competitive pricing.
Firm fixed-price contract protects against cost overruns for this specific order.
Specifications meet requirements for demanding operational environments (e.g., 4500 lbs GVWR).

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the automobile manufacturing sector, specifically for the procurement of light-duty vehicles. The General Services Administration (GSA) frequently procures vehicles for federal agencies, acting as a central purchasing body. The market for government vehicle procurement is substantial, with agencies requiring a wide range of vehicles for diverse operational needs. This specific award for AWD SUVs aligns with common agency requirements for versatile and capable transportation.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity, and the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this specific transaction is likely minimal unless RRDS INC utilizes small business subcontractors not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) oversees this contract, utilizing its Federal Acquisition Service. Oversight is typically managed through contract officers and program managers who monitor performance and compliance. Transparency is generally maintained through public contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

GSA Multiple Award Schedule (MAS)
Federal Fleet Management
Law Enforcement Vehicle Procurement
General Services Administration Vehicle Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for delivery delays due to short timeframe.
Reliance on a single delivery order without full context of the parent IDIQ contract.
No explicit small business subcontracting goals mentioned.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $31,254 to RRDS INC. AWD SUV, CROSSOVER, COMPACT, 4 DR, 5 PASS, MIN 4500 LBS GVWR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RRDS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $31,254.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2026-08-06.

What is the track record of RRDS INC in fulfilling government vehicle contracts?

Information regarding RRDS INC's specific track record in fulfilling government vehicle contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing their past performance history, including on-time delivery rates, vehicle quality, and adherence to contract terms on previous awards. Analyzing their performance on similar delivery orders or larger IDIQ contracts would provide insight into their reliability and capability. Without this historical data, it is difficult to definitively assess their past performance in government contracting.

How does the awarded price compare to similar AWD SUV procurements by the GSA in the last fiscal year?

To compare the awarded price of $31,254 per AWD SUV to similar GSA procurements, one would need access to historical GSA contract data for the previous fiscal year. This data would ideally include vehicles with comparable specifications such as AWD capability, GVWR, passenger capacity, and body style. A detailed analysis would involve identifying the average, median, and range of prices paid for similar vehicles. If the $31,254 price falls within or below the typical range for comparable vehicles, it indicates good value for money. Conversely, if it is significantly higher than the average, it might warrant further investigation into the specific requirements or market conditions.

What are the primary risks associated with this delivery order, given its short duration?

The primary risks associated with this delivery order, given its short 120-day duration, revolve around timely execution and potential supply chain disruptions. RRDS INC faces the risk of not being able to procure and deliver the specified vehicles within the tight timeframe, which could lead to penalties or contract termination. For the government, the risk is that the urgency might lead to compromises in quality control or that the contractor may not be able to secure the best possible pricing due to the compressed schedule. Furthermore, if this is a critical need, any delay could impact agency operations. The firm fixed-price nature mitigates cost overrun risks for the government but places the burden of timely delivery squarely on the contractor.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' strategy in ensuring competitive pricing for GSA vehicle procurements?

The 'full and open competition' strategy is generally considered highly effective in ensuring competitive pricing for GSA vehicle procurements. By allowing all responsible sources to bid, GSA maximizes the number of potential offerors, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving multiple competitive bids. This broad participation fosters price discovery and encourages contractors to submit their most aggressive pricing to win the contract. The data point of 10 bidders for this specific AWD SUV procurement supports the effectiveness of this strategy, as a higher number of bidders typically correlates with more competitive outcomes. While not a guarantee against all price fluctuations, it remains the government's preferred method for achieving best value.

What is the historical spending pattern for AWD SUVs by the General Services Administration?

Analyzing the historical spending pattern for AWD SUVs by the General Services Administration would involve examining procurement data over several fiscal years. This would reveal trends in the volume of SUVs purchased, the average price per unit, and the primary contractors. It would also highlight fluctuations in spending based on agency needs, budget allocations, and market conditions. For instance, spending might increase during periods of fleet modernization or decrease due to budget constraints. Understanding these patterns helps in forecasting future needs and setting realistic budget expectations for similar procurements. The current award of $31,254 per unit can then be benchmarked against this historical context.

What are the implications of the 'Automobile Manufacturing' NAICS code for this contract?

The assignment of NAICS code 336111, 'Automobile Manufacturing,' to this contract indicates that the primary business activity of the awarded contractor, RRDS INC, is involved in the production of automobiles. This suggests that RRDS INC is either a manufacturer or a direct representative/distributor of a manufacturer. For the government, this implies a direct line of procurement from the manufacturing source, potentially leading to more favorable pricing and direct access to manufacturer specifications and support. It also signifies that the contract supports the core industrial base of automobile production, aligning with broader economic objectives.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Motor Vehicle Manufacturing › Automobile Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MOTOR VEHICLES, CYCLES, TRAILERS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QMCA21R0008

Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12 GOODYEAR STE 100, IRVINE, CA, 92618

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $31,254

Exercised Options: $31,254

Current Obligation: $31,254

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QMCA22D000T

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline