GSA awards $261,940 for 10 eight-passenger RHD vans to KIG Technical Services, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $26,194 ($26.2K)

Contractor: KIG Technical Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-07

End Date: 2026-11-03

Contract Duration: 210 days

Daily Burn Rate: $125/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: VAN WAGON, 8 PASSENGER, RHD, JAPAN

Place of Performance

Location: SPRINGFIELD, LOUDOUN County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20598

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $26,194 to KIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC for work described as: VAN WAGON, 8 PASSENGER, RHD, JAPAN Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration is 210 days, indicating a short-term need for the vehicles. 3. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide predictability. 4. The vehicles are specified as right-hand drive (RHD) and for Japanese use, implying a specific operational requirement. 5. The award to KIG Technical Services, LLC is for a relatively small quantity of 10 vehicles. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 336110 points to motor vehicle manufacturing, though this is a supply contract.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value for these specific RHD vans is challenging without more detailed specifications and market data for Japanese domestic sales. However, the total award of $261,940 for 10 vehicles suggests an average unit price of approximately $26,194. This price needs to be compared against similar government procurements for specialized vehicles and against commercial off-the-shelf pricing for comparable models in the target market. The fixed-price nature provides cost certainty, but the value hinges on whether the price reflects competitive market rates for these specialized vehicles.

Cost Per Unit: Approximately $26,194 per vehicle, requiring further market comparison for specific RHD configurations.

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 10 bids suggests a reasonable level of competition for this specific requirement. A higher number of bidders generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower prices for the government. The specific number of bids (10) is a positive indicator, but the ultimate price achieved will determine the true success of the competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition with 10 bids is favorable for taxpayers, as it increases the likelihood of obtaining a fair market price and reduces the risk of overpayment compared to less competitive solicitations.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely government personnel or agencies operating in Japan requiring specialized right-hand drive vehicles. The services delivered include the supply of 10 eight-passenger, right-hand drive vans. The geographic impact is specific to operations within Japan. Workforce implications are minimal, primarily related to the logistics and delivery of the vehicles.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for higher-than-market prices if specialized RHD configuration drives up costs significantly.
Dependence on a single contractor for delivery within a tight timeframe.
Risk of delivery delays impacting operational readiness if unforeseen issues arise.
Limited visibility into the specific use case driving the need for RHD vans.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive process.
Fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Multiple bids received (10), suggesting market interest and potential for competitive pricing.
Clear specifications for vehicle type and passenger capacity.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader automotive manufacturing and supply sector. The market for specialized vehicles, particularly those with right-hand drive configurations for international use, can be niche. While the NAICS code points to manufacturing, this is a procurement of finished goods. Benchmarking would involve comparing this price to similar government contracts for vans and potentially to commercial sales data for similar vehicles in the Japanese market, considering import duties and logistics.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary impact on small businesses would be through potential subcontracting opportunities, which are not detailed in the provided data. Without specific subcontracting plans or goals, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically has robust oversight mechanisms for its contracts, including the Federal Acquisition Service (FAS). Accountability is managed through contract terms, performance monitoring, and payment processes. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General oversight may apply depending on the nature of any potential issues or investigations.

Related Government Programs

GSA Fleet Vehicle Procurement
Department of State Vehicle Procurement (Overseas)
Defense Logistics Agency Vehicle Procurement

Risk Flags

Potential for delivery delays
Specialized vehicle configuration may increase cost
International logistics complexity

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $26,194 to KIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC. VAN WAGON, 8 PASSENGER, RHD, JAPAN

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $26,194.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-07. End: 2026-11-03.

What is the track record of KIG Technical Services, LLC in supplying similar vehicles to the government?

Information regarding KIG Technical Services, LLC's specific track record in supplying eight-passenger, RHD vans to the government is not detailed in the provided data. A thorough analysis would require examining past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes with previous similar awards. Without this historical data, assessing their reliability and past performance in delivering comparable vehicles is speculative. Further research into contract databases and performance reports would be necessary to provide a comprehensive answer on their track record.

How does the per-unit cost of $26,194 compare to market rates for similar RHD vans?

The per-unit cost of approximately $26,194 requires careful market comparison. This figure needs to be benchmarked against commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) pricing for comparable eight-passenger, RHD vans in the Japanese market, factoring in any applicable taxes, import duties, and dealer markups. Additionally, it should be compared to historical government contract awards for similar vehicles, adjusting for inflation and any differences in specifications or delivery terms. Without access to specific market data for RHD vans in Japan and a detailed breakdown of the vehicle's features, a definitive value-for-money assessment is difficult. However, the competitive bidding process suggests an attempt to achieve a fair market price.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract award?

Key risks include potential delivery delays, especially given the specialized nature of RHD vehicles for international use, which could impact the agency's operational timeline. Price volatility for specialized automotive components or unforeseen logistical challenges in Japan could also pose risks, although the fixed-price contract mitigates direct cost escalation for the government. Furthermore, the specific operational need for RHD vans might indicate unique environmental or regulatory factors in Japan that could introduce unforeseen complexities. Ensuring the vehicles meet all Japanese roadworthiness and import regulations is also a critical risk factor.

How effective is the full and open competition in ensuring value for taxpayers in this specific instance?

The full and open competition, evidenced by 10 bids, is a strong indicator of potential value for taxpayers. This process theoretically allows the government to solicit offers from all interested and capable sources, fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation. The success in achieving value, however, depends on the quality and competitiveness of the bids received. If the bids were clustered at a high price point, or if the specifications were so narrow that only a few bidders could realistically compete, the value proposition might be diminished. A detailed analysis of the bid spread and the final awarded price relative to independent government cost estimates would provide a clearer picture of the competition's effectiveness.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar vehicle procurements by the GSA?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for similar vehicle procurements by the GSA would involve examining past awards for passenger vans, particularly those with specific configurations like RHD or intended for overseas use. This would help establish a baseline for pricing and identify any trends in contract types, competition levels, and average award values. Without access to GSA's historical procurement data for comparable vehicles, it's impossible to provide specific spending patterns. However, GSA generally procures vehicles through competitive solicitations, often leveraging large fleet contracts or individual delivery orders, aiming for cost efficiencies through bulk purchasing and established supplier relationships.

Are there any specific performance metrics or KPIs tied to this delivery order?

The provided data does not specify any particular performance metrics or Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) tied directly to this delivery order beyond the basic requirement of delivering 10 eight-passenger RHD vans by the specified end date. Standard contract clauses likely include requirements for timely delivery, vehicle condition upon arrival, and compliance with specifications. However, without explicit mention of performance-based metrics (e.g., fuel efficiency targets, warranty provisions beyond standard, or specific operational readiness criteria), it's assumed that performance is evaluated against the contractual specifications and delivery schedule.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Motor Vehicle Manufacturing › Automobile and Light Duty Motor Vehicle Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MOTOR VEHICLES, CYCLES, TRAILERS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QMCA23R0011

Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3030 K ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20007

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $26,194

Exercised Options: $26,194

Current Obligation: $26,194

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QMCA24D000D

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline