GSA awards $40,520 for 4x2 vans, highlighting potential for competitive pricing in vehicle acquisition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $40,520 ($40.5K)

Contractor: KIG Technical Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-10

End Date: 2026-11-06

Contract Duration: 210 days

Daily Burn Rate: $193/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 4X2 VAN WAGON, FULL SIZE, 8 PASSENGER, EURO

Place of Performance

Location: SPRINGFIELD, LOUDOUN County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20598

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $40,520 to KIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC for work described as: 4X2 VAN WAGON, FULL SIZE, 8 PASSENGER, EURO Key points: 1. Vehicle acquisition demonstrates a competitive market with multiple bids. 2. Contract type is firm fixed price, offering cost certainty. 3. Delivery order structure suggests a need for specific, time-bound vehicle procurement. 4. Contract duration is relatively short, indicating a focus on immediate operational needs. 5. The award to KIG Technical Services, LLC, is one of ten delivery orders under a larger contract. 6. Geographic focus on Washington D.C. may reflect agency operational requirements.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $40,520 for a 4x2 van appears reasonable given the specifications (full size, 8 passenger, Euro). Benchmarking against similar government vehicle procurements would provide a more definitive value assessment. The firm fixed-price structure helps control costs for this specific acquisition.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. With ten delivery orders issued, it suggests a robust underlying contract vehicle that has attracted significant interest and participation from multiple vendors. This level of competition is generally favorable for price discovery and achieving competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically leads to better pricing for taxpayers by ensuring a wide range of offers are considered, driving down costs through market forces.

Public Impact

Federal agencies operating in the Washington D.C. area benefit from the availability of these vehicles. The services delivered include the provision of essential transportation assets. The geographic impact is concentrated in the District of Columbia. Workforce implications are minimal, primarily related to the operation and maintenance of the vehicles.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for price creep if underlying contract terms are not closely managed across multiple delivery orders.
  • Dependence on a single contractor for multiple delivery orders could introduce supply chain risks if not diversified.
  • Ensuring vehicle specifications precisely match evolving agency needs requires ongoing vigilance.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a healthy market and competitive pricing.
  • Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for this specific acquisition.
  • Multiple delivery orders indicate a successful and utilized contract vehicle.

Sector Analysis

The acquisition of vehicles falls under the broader automotive manufacturing and sales sector. The General Services Administration (GSA) plays a crucial role in procuring vehicles for federal agencies, often leveraging large, competitively awarded contracts to achieve economies of scale. Spending in this category is consistent with the operational needs of government entities requiring transportation assets.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Further analysis of the master contract under which this delivery order was placed would be needed to determine the overall impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is provided by the General Services Administration (GSA) through its Federal Acquisition Service. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract offers a degree of financial oversight. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though detailed performance metrics may not be publicly available.

Related Government Programs

  • GSA Fleet Vehicle Purchasing
  • Federal Vehicle Acquisition Programs
  • General Services Administration Contracts

Risk Flags

  • Potential for non-compliance with U.S. vehicle standards if 'Euro' designation implies European-specific configurations.
  • Supply chain risks associated with automotive manufacturing and delivery timelines.
  • Need for robust contract management to ensure quality and timely delivery across multiple orders.

Tags

vehicle-acquisition, gsa, general-services-administration, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, automobile-manufacturing, district-of-columbia, kig-technical-services-llc, van

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $40,520 to KIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC. 4X2 VAN WAGON, FULL SIZE, 8 PASSENGER, EURO

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $40,520.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-10. End: 2026-11-06.

What is the track record of KIG Technical Services, LLC in fulfilling federal vehicle contracts?

Information regarding KIG Technical Services, LLC's specific track record with federal vehicle contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing their past performance ratings, contract history, and any reported issues or successes on similar awards. Federal procurement databases and contractor performance systems (like CPARS) would be the primary sources for this information. Understanding their experience with similar vehicle types, delivery volumes, and contract types (e.g., firm fixed-price) is crucial for evaluating their reliability and capability in fulfilling this specific delivery order.

How does the price of $40,520 for a 4x2 van compare to market rates for similar vehicles?

The price of $40,520 for a 4x2 van (full size, 8 passenger, Euro) needs to be benchmarked against current market rates for comparable commercial vehicles and other government procurements. Factors such as specific trim levels, optional equipment, and manufacturer incentives can influence pricing. While the firm fixed-price nature provides cost certainty for this order, a detailed comparison with dealership pricing, fleet purchase programs, and other GSA schedule awards for similar vehicles would be necessary to definitively assess value for money. Without this comparative data, it's difficult to ascertain if the price is highly competitive or represents a premium.

What are the primary risks associated with this specific delivery order?

The primary risks associated with this delivery order include potential delays in vehicle delivery if the contractor faces supply chain issues or production backlogs, which are common in the automotive industry. There's also a risk that the specified 'Euro' configuration might have unique maintenance or parts availability challenges in the U.S. market. Furthermore, if this is one of many orders under a larger contract, ensuring consistent quality and adherence to specifications across all orders is a potential risk. Finally, the short delivery window (210 days) increases the risk of non-performance if unforeseen circumstances arise.

How effective is the Federal Acquisition Service in managing vehicle procurements like this one?

The Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) generally employs robust processes for vehicle procurement, leveraging large-scale contracts and competitive bidding to achieve efficiency and cost savings. The use of firm fixed-price contracts and full and open competition, as seen here, are standard best practices aimed at maximizing value and minimizing risk. The existence of multiple delivery orders under a single contract vehicle suggests a functional framework for meeting agency needs. However, the overall effectiveness can vary based on specific contract management, oversight, and the responsiveness of contractors to evolving agency requirements.

What are the historical spending patterns for similar 4x2 vans by the General Services Administration?

Historical spending patterns for similar 4x2 vans by the GSA would typically show significant volume, as vehicles are a core requirement for many federal agencies. GSA often procures vehicles through large, multi-year contracts awarded via competitive bidding to secure favorable pricing. Annual spending can fluctuate based on agency needs, fleet modernization cycles, and budget allocations. Analyzing past awards for similar vehicle types (e.g., passenger vans, specific wheelbase/engine configurations) would reveal trends in pricing, quantities, and the primary contractors utilized, providing context for the current $40,520 award.

Does the 'Euro' designation imply specific safety or emissions standards that might affect cost or availability?

The 'Euro' designation in vehicle specifications typically refers to European standards for emissions and safety. If this van is intended for use in the U.S., it implies either that the vehicle is manufactured to meet these specific European standards (which may differ from U.S. DOT/EPA standards) or that it is a model primarily designed for the European market. This could potentially impact its compliance with U.S. regulations, require modifications, affect parts availability, or influence maintenance procedures and costs. Clarification on whether the vehicle is U.S.-compliant or requires specific adaptations is essential for a full understanding of its implications.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingMotor Vehicle ManufacturingAutomobile and Light Duty Motor Vehicle Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MOTOR VEHICLES, CYCLES, TRAILERS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QMCA23R0011

Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3030 K ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20007

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $40,520

Exercised Options: $40,520

Current Obligation: $40,520

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QMCA24D000D

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-04-10

Current End Date: 2026-11-06

Potential End Date: 2026-11-06 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-12

More Contracts from KIG Technical Services, LLC

View all KIG Technical Services, LLC federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending