GSA awards $118M task order to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL for computer systems design services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $118,266,251 ($118.3M)

Contractor: Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2024-05-01

End Date: 2026-04-30

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $162.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: CDM DEFEND GROUP E BRIDGE TASK ORDER

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22203

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $118.3 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. for work described as: CDM DEFEND GROUP E BRIDGE TASK ORDER Key points: 1. The contract's cost-plus-award-fee structure allows for flexibility but requires careful monitoring of performance against award criteria. 2. Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process, potentially leading to competitive pricing. 3. The contract duration of 729 days indicates a significant commitment for ongoing services. 4. The task order is part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract, suggesting a framework for ongoing needs. 5. The services fall under computer systems design, a critical area for federal IT infrastructure. 6. The awardee, MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, will be assessed on performance to determine award fees, linking payment to outcomes.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

Benchmarking the $118.2 million cost-plus-award-fee task order against similar computer systems design services contracts is challenging without more specific service details. However, the full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment. The cost-plus-award-fee (CPAF) pricing model, while offering flexibility, necessitates rigorous oversight to ensure value for money is achieved, as award fees are tied to performance metrics. The total value over the 729-day period averages approximately $162,231 per day, which needs to be evaluated against the scope and complexity of the services provided.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which is beneficial for price discovery and potentially leads to more favorable pricing for the government. The GSA's use of this method suggests a commitment to maximizing competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is the most taxpayer-friendly approach, as it maximizes the pool of potential offerors, driving down costs through market forces and ensuring the government receives the best possible value.

Public Impact

Federal agencies utilizing GSA's Federal Acquisition Service will benefit from enhanced computer systems design and support. The contract supports the modernization and efficiency of federal IT infrastructure. The services are likely to impact various federal departments and agencies that rely on GSA's IT support. The contract may indirectly support a workforce skilled in computer systems design and related IT fields.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The cost-plus-award-fee structure requires diligent oversight to ensure performance targets are met and costs remain controlled.
Lack of specific details on the services rendered makes it difficult to fully assess value for money.
The duration of the contract implies a long-term dependency on the contractor's services.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
The task order is part of a larger IDIQ contract, indicating a strategic approach to IT procurement.
The CPAF structure incentivizes contractor performance through award fees.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Computer Systems Design Services sector, a vital component of the federal IT landscape. This sector encompasses a wide range of services, including IT consulting, systems integration, and custom software development. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services, with spending often driven by the need to modernize legacy systems, enhance cybersecurity, and improve operational efficiency. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within GSA's IT Schedule or other agency-specific IT procurement vehicles, reflecting the broad demand for these capabilities across government.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a small business set-aside. The prime contractor, MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, is likely a large business, and any subcontracting opportunities would be at their discretion.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this task order will likely be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) through its Federal Acquisition Service. The contract's cost-plus-award-fee (CPAF) structure necessitates performance monitoring against defined metrics to justify award fees, providing a degree of accountability. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

GSA IT Schedule
CIO-SP3
Alliant 2
IT Professional Services

Risk Flags

Cost-Plus-Award-Fee (CPAF) requires robust performance monitoring.
Potential for scope creep in complex IT projects.
Dependence on contractor performance for critical IT functions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $118.3 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.. CDM DEFEND GROUP E BRIDGE TASK ORDER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $118.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-05-01. End: 2026-04-30.

What is the track record of MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL with the federal government, particularly in computer systems design services?

MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL has a history of federal contracting. A review of federal procurement data would reveal the extent and nature of their past performance. Specifically for computer systems design services, it's important to examine prior contracts awarded to them, their performance ratings on those contracts, and any past performance issues or commendations. Understanding their experience with similar task orders, contract types (like CPAF), and agencies can provide insight into their capability to successfully execute this $118 million award. Analyzing their financial stability and any past disputes or litigation would also be part of a comprehensive track record assessment.

How does the average daily cost of this task order compare to similar federal contracts for computer systems design services?

The average daily cost for this task order is approximately $162,231 ($118,266,250.93 / 729 days). To benchmark this effectively, one would need to compare it against contracts with similar scope, complexity, and service levels within the computer systems design domain. Factors such as the specific services rendered (e.g., cloud integration, cybersecurity architecture, software development), the level of expertise required, and the geographic location of service delivery significantly influence pricing. A comparison would ideally involve analyzing data from GSA's IT Schedule, other IDIQ vehicles, or agency-specific IT procurements to determine if this daily rate is within the expected market range for comparable federal services.

What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract of this magnitude?

The primary risks associated with a $118 million CPAF contract include potential cost overruns if performance metrics are not clearly defined or rigorously monitored, leading to higher-than-expected award fees. There's also a risk that the contractor may focus on achieving award fee criteria at the expense of other critical, but unmeasured, aspects of performance. For the government, effective oversight is paramount to ensure that award fees are earned based on genuine superior performance and not simply on meeting minimum requirements. Contractor performance management and robust quality assurance are essential to mitigate these risks and ensure value for taxpayer dollars.

How does the 'full and open competition' procurement method impact the government's ability to achieve program effectiveness?

Full and open competition generally enhances program effectiveness by ensuring that the government selects the most capable contractor from the widest possible pool of offerors. This competitive pressure incentivizes contractors to propose innovative solutions and efficient methodologies to win the contract. By allowing all responsible sources to compete, the government increases its chances of finding a contractor with the best technical expertise, management capabilities, and understanding of the program's requirements. This can lead to better service delivery, higher quality outcomes, and a greater likelihood of achieving the program's intended objectives.

What are the historical spending patterns for computer systems design services by the General Services Administration?

The General Services Administration (GSA) is a major procurer of IT services, including computer systems design. Historical spending patterns show a consistent and significant investment in this category, driven by the need to support federal agencies' IT modernization efforts, cloud migrations, and cybersecurity enhancements. GSA often utilizes vehicles like the IT Schedule and various IDIQ contracts to facilitate these procurements. Analyzing GSA's historical spending data would reveal trends in contract types (e.g., FFP, T&M, CPAF), average contract values, and the distribution of awards among large and small businesses, providing context for current spending levels.

What are the potential implications of this contract award on federal IT modernization efforts?

This $118 million task order for computer systems design services awarded to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL has significant implications for federal IT modernization. Such contracts are crucial for agencies seeking to upgrade legacy systems, implement new technologies (like AI or cloud computing), enhance cybersecurity postures, and improve overall IT infrastructure efficiency. The services provided under this contract will likely contribute directly to projects aimed at making federal IT systems more agile, secure, and cost-effective, ultimately supporting the government's digital transformation goals and improving service delivery to citizens.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFRA24R0004

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Mantech International Corporation

Address: 2251 CORPORATE PARK DRIVE, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $197,151,927

Exercised Options: $133,645,878

Current Obligation: $118,266,251

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 75

Total Subaward Amount: $75,057,321

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QTCK18D0031

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline