GSA awards $3,022 contract for cafe hood and grease trap cleaning at Akron federal building

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,022 ($3.0K)

Contractor: CMC & Maintenance Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-09

End Date: 2026-08-31

Contract Duration: 144 days

Daily Burn Rate: $21/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CLEANING SERVICES FOR THE CAFE HOOD AND GREASE TRAP AT THE JOHN SEIBERLING FEDERAL BUILDING IN AKRON, OHIO.

Place of Performance

Location: AKRON, SUMMIT County, OHIO, 44308

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $3,022.24 to CMC & MAINTENANCE INC for work described as: CLEANING SERVICES FOR THE CAFE HOOD AND GREASE TRAP AT THE JOHN SEIBERLING FEDERAL BUILDING IN AKRON, OHIO. Key points: 1. Contract value is relatively small, suggesting a localized service need. 2. Service type falls under facilities support, a common government function. 3. Fixed-price contract type limits cost overruns for the government. 4. Contract duration is short, allowing for frequent re-evaluation of needs. 5. No small business set-aside indicates a focus on best value regardless of business size. 6. The award was made via a BPA Call, suggesting pre-negotiated terms and streamlined ordering.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3,022.24 is modest, typical for specialized cleaning services at a single federal facility. Benchmarking against similar contracts for cafe hood and grease trap cleaning at federal buildings of comparable size would likely show this price to be within a reasonable range. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government, and the short duration allows for market testing and potential renegotiation if prices increase.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, this method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value. The use of a BPA Call suggests that a competitive process was likely used to establish the underlying Blanket Purchase Agreement.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down prices through market forces.

Public Impact

The John Seiberling Federal Building in Akron, Ohio, will benefit from improved sanitation and safety. This contract ensures compliance with health and safety regulations for food service areas. The services provided will maintain the operational readiness of the federal building's facilities. Local businesses specializing in industrial cleaning services may have had the opportunity to bid.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific bidder count limits assessment of competitive intensity.
Limited contract value may not attract a wide range of specialized service providers.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Full and open competition promotes market-driven pricing.
Award via BPA Call suggests efficient procurement processes.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, which encompasses a broad range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of government buildings. This specific service addresses critical hygiene and safety requirements for food service areas. Spending in this sector is consistent across federal agencies, with significant annual outlays for building operations, maintenance, and repair.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements. This suggests that the procurement focused on obtaining the best value from any qualified offeror, regardless of size. While this specific award may not directly benefit small businesses through a set-aside, the overall federal contracting landscape often includes opportunities for small businesses in facilities maintenance.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing federal building operations and maintenance. Contracts awarded through BPA Calls are typically subject to the terms and conditions established during the initial BPA competition. Oversight would involve ensuring that CMC & MAINTENANCE INC performs the services according to the contract specifications and that payments are processed correctly. Transparency is generally maintained through public contract databases.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
Janitorial and Cleaning Services
Facilities Management Services
General Services Administration Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract value is very low, potentially limiting the pool of highly specialized bidders.
Specific performance metrics and quality assurance details are not provided.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $3,022.24 to CMC & MAINTENANCE INC. CLEANING SERVICES FOR THE CAFE HOOD AND GREASE TRAP AT THE JOHN SEIBERLING FEDERAL BUILDING IN AKRON, OHIO.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CMC & MAINTENANCE INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3,022.24.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2026-08-31.

What is the track record of CMC & MAINTENANCE INC in performing federal contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of CMC & MAINTENANCE INC in performing federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes with previous government engagements. The General Services Administration (GSA) maintains performance records for its contractors, which can be accessed through various federal procurement portals. Without this specific data, it is difficult to definitively assess their reliability and past performance on similar federal projects. However, the award of this contract, especially via a BPA Call, suggests they met the basic qualifications and were deemed a responsible source at the time of award.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar services for federal facilities?

The contract value of $3,022.24 for cleaning services at the John Seiberling Federal Building is relatively low, suggesting a localized and specific service requirement. Benchmarking this price against similar contracts for cafe hood and grease trap cleaning at federal buildings of comparable size and complexity would be necessary for a thorough value assessment. Factors such as the frequency of service, the specific scope of work (e.g., size of hoods, depth of grease traps), and regional labor costs would influence pricing. Given the firm fixed-price nature and full and open competition, it is presumed that the price reflects a competitive market rate for the defined services. However, without comparative data on similar contracts, a definitive statement on whether this represents excellent or merely fair value is challenging.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract are relatively low due to its small value and specific scope. Potential risks include inadequate service quality, contractor non-performance, or minor cost overruns if unforeseen issues arise (though mitigated by fixed-price). Mitigation strategies include the firm fixed-price contract type, which caps the government's liability. The General Services Administration (GSA) also has oversight mechanisms to ensure performance standards are met. The short contract duration allows for early identification and correction of any performance issues, and the option to not renew or re-compete provides flexibility. The use of a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call implies that the contractor has already been vetted and deemed capable.

How effective is the General Services Administration (GSA) in managing contracts for facilities support services?

The General Services Administration (GSA) is a major federal agency responsible for managing a vast portfolio of federal real estate and associated support services. Its effectiveness in managing contracts for facilities support services is generally considered robust, given its extensive experience and established procurement processes. GSA utilizes various contract vehicles, including Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs), to streamline the acquisition of recurring services like cleaning. They employ performance management systems and oversight protocols to ensure contractors meet service level agreements. While specific contract performance can vary, GSA's overall framework aims for efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and compliance across its diverse range of facilities and services.

What are the historical spending patterns for cleaning and maintenance services at federal buildings managed by GSA?

Historical spending patterns for cleaning and maintenance services at federal buildings managed by the GSA are substantial, reflecting the vast inventory of government properties. GSA consistently allocates significant portions of its budget to facilities operations and maintenance, which includes janitorial services, HVAC maintenance, plumbing, electrical repairs, and specialized cleaning like grease trap maintenance. Spending varies based on the size and age of buildings, geographic location, and the specific services required. Contracts are often awarded through competitive bidding processes, including IDIQs (Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity) and BPAs, to ensure cost efficiency. While this specific $3,022 contract is a small component, it represents a typical micro-purchase or call-order within a larger framework of facilities support spending.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4 UNION ST, BANGOR, ME, 04401

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,022

Exercised Options: $3,022

Current Obligation: $3,022

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PF0023A0008

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline