VA awards $25M MATOC to Williams Building Company for construction services in Massachusetts

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,500,358 ($2.5M)

Contractor: Williams Building Company, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2022-06-01

End Date: 2026-03-16

Contract Duration: 1,384 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: MATOC

Place of Performance

Location: WEST ROXBURY, SUFFOLK County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02132

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $2.5 million to WILLIAMS BUILDING COMPANY, INC. for work described as: MATOC Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 2. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 3. Duration of 1384 days indicates a long-term need for construction services. 4. The award is a Delivery Order under a MATOC, implying a pre-competed base contract. 5. No small business set-aside was utilized, potentially limiting direct opportunities for small businesses. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to commercial and institutional building construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The total award amount of $25,003,581.16 for a MATOC delivery order appears reasonable given the 1384-day duration and the scope of commercial and institutional building construction. Benchmarking against similar large-scale construction contracts awarded by the VA or other federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract helps control costs for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' which is a specific type of full and open competition. This indicates that the solicitation was made available to all responsible sources, and any responsible source was permitted to submit a bid. The fact that it was competed suggests that multiple bidders likely vied for the opportunity, leading to price discovery and potentially more favorable pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down prices and encourage innovation from a wider pool of contractors.

Public Impact

The Department of Veterans Affairs is the primary beneficiary, receiving construction services to support its facilities. Services delivered include commercial and institutional building construction, likely encompassing repairs, renovations, and new construction projects. The geographic impact is focused on Massachusetts, where the construction projects will be physically located. Workforce implications include job creation for construction workers, project managers, and support staff in the Massachusetts area.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The construction industry is a significant sector for federal spending, encompassing a wide range of activities from infrastructure development to facility maintenance and upgrades. This contract falls under commercial and institutional building construction, a segment that includes building new facilities, renovating existing ones, and performing repairs. Federal agencies like the VA are major clients, requiring construction services to maintain and expand their operational footprint. Benchmarks for similar construction contracts can vary widely based on project scope, location, and complexity, but a $25 million award for a multi-year delivery order is substantial within this sector.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it appear to have specific small business subcontracting goals explicitly stated in the provided data. This means that large businesses were eligible to compete and win, and there is no direct mandate for subcontracting to small businesses through this specific award. The impact on the small business ecosystem is neutral to potentially negative if small businesses were unable to compete directly or indirectly for this significant contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Veterans Affairs' contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the Firm Fixed Price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though specific project details under the MATOC delivery order may require further inquiry. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

construction, department-of-veterans-affairs, massachusetts, matoc, delivery-order, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, commercial-building, institutional-building, large-contract, multi-year

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $2.5 million to WILLIAMS BUILDING COMPANY, INC.. MATOC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WILLIAMS BUILDING COMPANY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-06-01. End: 2026-03-16.

What is the track record of Williams Building Company, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of Veterans Affairs?

A review of federal procurement data indicates that Williams Building Company, Inc. has a history of receiving federal contracts. To provide a comprehensive assessment of their track record, further analysis would be needed to examine the number, value, and types of contracts they have been awarded previously, as well as their performance ratings on those contracts. Specifically, their past performance with the Department of Veterans Affairs would be a key indicator of their suitability for this current award. Examining contract modifications, past performance evaluations (if publicly available), and any history of disputes or terminations would offer deeper insights into their reliability and capability as a federal contractor.

How does the awarded price of $25,003,581.16 compare to similar construction contracts for institutional buildings in Massachusetts?

Benchmarking this $25 million award requires comparing it to similar construction projects in Massachusetts, considering factors like project scope (new construction vs. renovation), building type (hospital, office, educational), size (square footage), and complexity. Without specific details on the individual projects to be undertaken under this MATOC delivery order, a precise comparison is challenging. However, for large-scale institutional construction projects in the region, this award amount appears within a reasonable range, especially given the 1384-day duration. A detailed analysis would involve identifying comparable projects awarded over the past few years, adjusting for inflation and market conditions, and assessing the unit costs (e.g., cost per square foot) if available.

What are the primary risks associated with a multi-year MATOC delivery order for construction services, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with a multi-year MATOC delivery order for construction services include potential cost escalation over the long duration, unforeseen site conditions, contractor performance issues, and delays in project completion. Mitigation strategies are embedded within the contract structure and oversight. The Firm Fixed Price (FFP) nature of this award shifts significant cost risk to Williams Building Company, Inc. The Department of Veterans Affairs will likely employ robust project management and oversight to monitor progress, quality, and adherence to schedule. Contract clauses addressing unforeseen conditions and performance standards also serve as mitigation tools. Regular progress reviews and clear communication channels are crucial for proactive risk management.

What is the expected program effectiveness and impact of these construction services on VA facilities in Massachusetts?

The expected program effectiveness hinges on the successful completion of construction projects that enhance or maintain the functionality and safety of VA facilities in Massachusetts. This could translate to improved patient care environments, updated infrastructure, expanded capacity, or enhanced operational efficiency. The impact is directly tied to the specific needs addressed by the construction projects undertaken. If these projects address critical infrastructure deficiencies or support new service lines, the effectiveness will be high. Conversely, if projects are delayed or do not meet quality standards, effectiveness will be diminished. The long-term impact should be measured by the sustained utility and condition of the upgraded or newly constructed facilities.

How has federal spending on commercial and institutional building construction, specifically by the Department of Veterans Affairs, trended in recent years?

Federal spending on commercial and institutional building construction, particularly by the Department of Veterans Affairs, has generally been substantial, driven by the need to maintain and modernize a vast network of healthcare facilities and administrative buildings. Recent years have likely seen continued investment, potentially increasing due to aging infrastructure, evolving healthcare needs, and specific legislative funding initiatives aimed at facility upgrades. Analyzing historical spending data for NAICS code 236220 awarded by the VA would reveal specific trends, including fluctuations in annual obligations, average contract values, and the prevalence of different contract types (e.g., MATOCs, design-build). This context helps in evaluating whether the current $25 million award is consistent with historical spending patterns or represents a significant shift.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTYMAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 36C24121R0019

Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 259A N ST STE 2, HYANNIS, MA, 02601

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,500,358

Exercised Options: $2,500,358

Current Obligation: $2,500,358

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 36C24118D0105

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2022-06-01

Current End Date: 2026-03-16

Potential End Date: 2026-03-16 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-01-07

More Contracts from Williams Building Company, Inc.

View all Williams Building Company, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Veterans Affairs Contracts

View all Department of Veterans Affairs contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending