DOD Awards $11.95M for Facilities Support Services, Extending Contract for 7-12 Months

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,887,766 ($20.9M)

Contractor: TC & S/F-W LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2015-02-01

End Date: 2016-01-31

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $57.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 12

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF DELIVERY ORDER 3000-PROVIDE FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,954,439.26 FOR THIRD OPTION PERIOD. --7 MONTHS FUNDING FOR SUBCLINS 0005AA, AC, AE,&AH --12 MONTHS FUNDING FOR SUBCLINS 0005AB, AD, AF,&AJ

Place of Performance

Location: FORT LEONARD WOOD, PULASKI County, MISSOURI, 65473

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $20.9 million to TC & S/F-W LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF DELIVERY ORDER 3000-PROVIDE FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,954,439.26 FOR THIRD OPTION PERIOD. --7 MONTHS FUNDING FOR SUBCLINS 0005AA, AC, AE,&AH --12 MONTHS FUNDING FOR SUBCLINS 0005AB, AD, AF,&AJ Key points: 1. Contract value of $11,954,439.26 for a 7-12 month period. 2. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, indicating a structured procurement process. 3. Risk appears moderate given the cost-plus award fee structure, which incentivizes performance. 4. Sector is Facilities Support Services, a critical component of government operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $11.95M for a 12-month period suggests a reasonable price for facilities support services. Benchmarking against similar contracts would provide a more precise assessment of value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources.' This method allows for broad participation while addressing specific source limitations, aiming for competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is intended to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently for essential facilities support.

Public Impact

Ensures continued operation and maintenance of critical facilities. Supports military readiness and personnel by providing essential services. Potential for job creation within the facilities support sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Award Fee structure can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
Exclusion of sources in competition may limit ultimate price discovery.
Contract duration of 7-12 months for option period may indicate ongoing need and potential for future extensions.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition aims for best value.
Facilities support is a core government function.
Award fee structure incentivizes contractor performance.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services are essential for government operations, encompassing maintenance, repair, and management of physical infrastructure. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on agency needs and infrastructure age.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate if small businesses were involved in this specific delivery order. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'exclusion of sources' clause warrants scrutiny to ensure it was justified and did not unduly restrict competition. Robust oversight is needed to manage the cost-plus award fee structure effectively.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Support Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns with CPAF structure.
Justification for 'exclusion of sources' needs verification.
Limited duration of option period may indicate ongoing uncertainty or need for re-competition.
Lack of detail on specific services provided.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $20.9 million to TC & S/F-W LLC. IGF::OT::IGF DELIVERY ORDER 3000-PROVIDE FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,954,439.26 FOR THIRD OPTION PERIOD. --7 MONTHS FUNDING FOR SUBCLINS 0005AA, AC, AE,&AH --12 MONTHS FUNDING FOR SUBCLINS 0005AB, AD, AF,&AJ

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TC & S/F-W LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2015-02-01. End: 2016-01-31.

What specific facilities and services are covered under this contract, and how does their scope align with the awarded amount?

The contract covers facilities support services for specific sub-clinics (0005AA, AC, AE, AH for 7 months and 0005AB, AD, AF, AJ for 12 months). The exact nature of these services (e.g., maintenance, janitorial, security) and the facilities they pertain to are not detailed. A precise alignment of scope with the $11.95M award requires a detailed breakdown of service requirements and their associated costs.

What were the justifications for excluding certain sources in the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' award method?

The justification for excluding sources typically relates to specific technical capabilities, past performance, or unique requirements that only a limited number of contractors can meet. For this contract, the exclusion might be due to specialized knowledge of the facilities, existing infrastructure, or security clearances required. A thorough review of the procurement documentation is necessary to confirm the validity and necessity of these exclusions.

How effectively does the Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure incentivize performance and control costs for these facilities support services?

The CPAF structure aims to incentivize contractor performance by linking a portion of the fee to achieving specific performance objectives. However, it also carries a risk of cost growth if the base fee is too high or if award criteria are not stringent. Effective management and clear, measurable performance metrics are crucial to ensure this structure delivers value and controls costs for facilities support.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W911S709R0004

Offers Received: 12

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 346 EAGLE DR, SAN JUAN PUEBLO, NM, 87566

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Government, Native American Tribal Government, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $20,887,766

Exercised Options: $20,887,766

Current Obligation: $20,887,766

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W911S712D0002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline