DoD's $19.7M Facilities Support Services Contract Awarded to TC & S/F-W LLC Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,668,787 ($19.7M)

Contractor: TC & S/F-W LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2013-01-18

End Date: 2014-12-18

Contract Duration: 699 days

Daily Burn Rate: $28.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FIRST OPTION PERIOD - LEVEL I SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: FORT LEONARD WOOD, PULASKI County, MISSOURI, 65473

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $19.7 million to TC & S/F-W LLC for work described as: FIRST OPTION PERIOD - LEVEL I SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value of $19.7M for Level I services. 2. Awarded to TC & S/F-W LLC. 3. Competition method was 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources'. 4. Services fall under Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210). 5. Contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF).

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $19.7M for Level I services appears reasonable for facilities support. However, without specific service details or benchmarks for similar contracts, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. The CPAF structure allows for performance-based adjustments.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources', indicating a competitive process. This method aims to ensure fair pricing and access for qualified vendors, though the exclusion clause warrants further review for its necessity and impact on broader competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for essential facilities support services. The competitive award process aims to ensure value for money, but the CPAF structure requires careful monitoring to control costs and ensure performance.

Public Impact

Ensures operational readiness of facilities through essential support services. Supports military personnel and operations by maintaining infrastructure. Potential for cost savings or overruns depending on performance and award fee structure. Impacts local economy through contractor employment and resource utilization.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
The 'Exclusion of Sources' clause in the competition method needs justification.
Lack of detailed service scope makes direct cost comparison challenging.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a full and open competitive process.
Contract duration provides stability for service delivery.
Focus on Level I services suggests essential operational support.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) is a broad category encompassing maintenance, operation, and management of facilities. Government spending in this sector is substantial, driven by the need to maintain extensive infrastructure for various agencies. Benchmarks vary widely based on the scope and complexity of services.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation in this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is crucial for CPAF contracts to ensure performance targets are met and award fees are justified. The Department of the Army's contracting officers are responsible for monitoring contractor performance and managing the award fee process to ensure accountability.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Support Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost creep due to CPAF structure.
Lack of transparency regarding excluded sources.
Limited insight into specific service deliverables and performance metrics.
No clear indication of small business participation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $19.7 million to TC & S/F-W LLC. FIRST OPTION PERIOD - LEVEL I SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TC & S/F-W LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-01-18. End: 2014-12-18.

What specific Level I services are included in this contract, and how do they compare to industry standards for cost-effectiveness?

The specific Level I services are not detailed in the provided data. To assess cost-effectiveness, a breakdown of services such as janitorial, security, maintenance, and groundskeeping would be needed. Comparing these to industry benchmarks for similar government or commercial contracts would reveal if the $19.7M award represents good value or if there's potential for cost savings through renegotiation or improved service delivery.

What is the justification for excluding certain sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method, and what was the impact on pricing?

The justification for excluding sources is not provided. Typically, such exclusions are based on specific technical capabilities, security requirements, or prior performance issues. Without this justification, it's difficult to assess if the exclusion limited competition unnecessarily, potentially leading to higher prices than a truly open competition might have yielded. The impact on pricing is unknown without comparative bids.

How effectively does the Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure incentivize TC & S/F-W LLC to deliver high-quality facilities support services within budget?

The CPAF structure incentivizes performance by allowing for award fees based on achieving specific metrics. Its effectiveness hinges on well-defined performance standards and objective evaluation criteria. If these are robust, it can drive quality. However, CPAF also carries a risk of cost overruns if the base fee is high or if the award fee structure doesn't sufficiently penalize cost inefficiencies, requiring diligent oversight from the Army.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W911S709R0004

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 346 EAGLE DR, SAN JUAN PUEBLO, NM, 87566

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Government, Native American Tribal Government, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,668,787

Exercised Options: $19,668,787

Current Obligation: $19,668,787

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W911S712D0002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline