State Department awards $18.5M contract for facility services, with 2 bidders competing

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,499 ($18.5K)

Contractor: Centerra Facility Services Gmbh

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2026-04-02

End Date: 2026-06-29

Contract Duration: 88 days

Daily Burn Rate: $210/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: F-FAC-SVC&MAT-REPLACE END LIFECYCLE FLOOR@PLIENINGER 20-1

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $18,498.84 to CENTERRA FACILITY SERVICES GMBH for work described as: F-FAC-SVC&MAT-REPLACE END LIFECYCLE FLOOR@PLIENINGER 20-1 Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the scope of facility maintenance and repair services. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a moderately competitive environment with two bidders. 3. Risk indicators are low, suggesting a standard service contract with predictable outcomes. 4. Performance context is for ongoing facility operations and maintenance. 5. Sector positioning is within general building services and maintenance.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $18.5 million over approximately 2.75 years for facility services appears to be within a reasonable range for the scope of work. Benchmarking against similar contracts for building maintenance and repair services by the State Department or other federal agencies would provide a more precise value assessment. However, the presence of two bidders suggests some level of market interest and potential for competitive pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which typically involves a limited number of bidders. With two bidders identified, the competition level is moderate for this type of procurement. While not a full and open competition, it suggests that multiple vendors were aware of and able to respond to the requirement.

Taxpayer Impact: A limited competition under SAP generally leads to fair market pricing, but may not achieve the absolute lowest prices possible compared to a broader, full-and-open competition.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of State personnel and operations at the facility requiring maintenance. Services delivered include general building finishing, maintenance, and repair. The geographic impact is localized to the specific facility managed by the State Department. Workforce implications include employment for skilled trades and maintenance personnel employed by the contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Positive Signals

Contract awarded to a single entity, indicating clear lines of responsibility.
Firm Fixed Price contract type helps control costs and provides budget certainty.
Contract duration is relatively short, allowing for periodic re-evaluation of services and pricing.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader building services and maintenance sector, which is a significant part of the federal procurement landscape. Agencies like the Department of State require continuous facility support to maintain operational readiness. Spending in this sector is generally stable, driven by the need to preserve government infrastructure.

Small Business Impact

Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans was not explicitly provided in the data. Given the nature of the services and the competition level, it's possible that larger firms were the primary participants. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses had opportunities to participate either as prime contractors or subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within the Department of State. Performance monitoring and quality assurance would be key accountability measures. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases, though specific performance details may not be publicly disclosed.

Related Government Programs

Department of State Facilities Management
General Services Administration (GSA) Building Operations
Federal Building Maintenance Contracts

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $18,498.84 to CENTERRA FACILITY SERVICES GMBH. F-FAC-SVC&MAT-REPLACE END LIFECYCLE FLOOR@PLIENINGER 20-1

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CENTERRA FACILITY SERVICES GMBH.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18,498.84.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-02. End: 2026-06-29.

What is the track record of CENTERRA FACILITY SERVICES GMBH with the Department of State?

A review of federal procurement data would be necessary to fully assess CENTERRA FACILITY SERVICES GMBH's track record with the Department of State. This would involve examining past contract awards, performance evaluations (if available), and any history of disputes or contract modifications. Understanding their past performance on similar contracts, particularly those involving facility services and maintenance, would provide insight into their reliability and capability to fulfill the current contract requirements. Without specific historical data on this contractor's performance with the State Department, it is difficult to provide a detailed assessment.

How does the awarded price compare to similar facility services contracts?

To benchmark the awarded price of $18.5 million, a comparative analysis with similar facility services contracts awarded by the Department of State or other federal agencies for comparable services and facility sizes would be required. Factors such as geographic location, scope of services (e.g., janitorial, HVAC, electrical, plumbing), contract duration, and the level of competition can significantly influence pricing. If this contract's per-square-foot maintenance cost or hourly labor rates fall within the typical range observed in similar procurements, it would suggest fair market value. Conversely, significant deviations could indicate either exceptional value or potential overpricing.

What are the primary risks associated with this facility services contract?

The primary risks associated with this facility services contract are generally related to service delivery and contractor performance. These include potential disruptions to facility operations due to contractor staffing issues, inadequate maintenance leading to equipment failures or safety hazards, and cost overruns if the firm fixed-price structure is not managed effectively. There's also a risk of scope creep if additional services are required beyond the original contract terms without proper modification. The relatively short duration of the contract (88 days) mitigates some long-term performance risks but necessitates efficient onboarding and service initiation.

How effective is the current competition level in ensuring optimal pricing for taxpayers?

The current competition level, with two bidders under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), offers a moderate level of price discovery for taxpayers. While two bidders are better than one, it does not represent the robust competition typically seen in full-and-open procurements, which often drives prices down further. The effectiveness in ensuring optimal pricing depends on the specific market dynamics for these services and the bidders' strategies. It's possible that a more extensive competition could have yielded even more competitive bids, but the current level likely prevents egregious overpricing.

What is the historical spending trend for similar facility services at this Department of State location?

To determine historical spending trends for similar facility services at this specific Department of State location, one would need to access and analyze past contract awards for facility maintenance and repair at that site. This analysis would involve identifying previous contracts, their values, durations, and the services provided. Comparing the current $18.5 million award against these historical figures would reveal whether spending has increased, decreased, or remained stable over time. Understanding these trends can help identify potential cost efficiencies or areas where spending may be escalating, providing context for the current procurement's value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Building Finishing Contractors › Other Building Finishing Contractors

Product/Service Code: INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT › INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: VON-MILLER-STR. 13, KAISERSLAUTERN

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $18,499

Exercised Options: $18,499

Current Obligation: $18,499

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 19GE2125A0105

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline