Justice Department awards $68.3M contract for critical judicial security services to Securityhunter, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $68,300 ($68.3K)

Contractor: Securityhunter, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-08-27

End Date: 2026-08-28

Contract Duration: 366 days

Daily Burn Rate: $187/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: MISSION CRITICAL: SAFEGUARDING THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL PROCESS, INCLUDING PROTECTING JUDGES, ATTORNEYS, AND COURT PERSONNEL. PROVIDING PHYSICAL SECURITY IN COURTHOUSES. NEW ORDER

Place of Performance

Location: WINDSOR MILL, BALTIMORE County, MARYLAND, 21244

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $68,300.43 to SECURITYHUNTER, INC. for work described as: MISSION CRITICAL: SAFEGUARDING THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL PROCESS, INCLUDING PROTECTING JUDGES, ATTORNEYS, AND COURT PERSONNEL. PROVIDING PHYSICAL SECURITY IN COURTHOUSES. NEW ORDER Key points: 1. Contract supports vital mission of safeguarding federal judicial process and personnel. 2. Securityhunter, Inc. selected through full and open competition. 3. Contract value of $68.3M over 366 days indicates significant investment in judicial security. 4. Firm-fixed-price contract type suggests predictable cost structure. 5. Performance period spans over one year, ensuring continuity of essential security services. 6. The contract falls under Engineering Services (NAICS 541330), indicating a focus on technical security solutions.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $68.3M for a 366-day period, while substantial, needs to be benchmarked against similar judicial security contracts to fully assess value for money. The firm-fixed-price structure is generally favorable for cost control. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the competitive award process suggests a reasonable price was sought.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through a full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This process is designed to foster price discovery and ensure the government receives competitive pricing. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the open nature of the competition is a positive indicator for market responsiveness.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down costs through vendor rivalry, ensuring that public funds are used efficiently for essential security services.

Public Impact

Federal judges, attorneys, and court personnel across the nation will benefit from enhanced physical security. The contract ensures the continued provision of physical security services within federal courthouses. Services are critical for maintaining the integrity and safety of the federal judicial process. This contract supports the operational readiness and safety of the U.S. Marshals Service. Workforce implications include potential employment opportunities for security personnel and related technical staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurs despite fixed-price contract.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical security functions could pose risks.
Ensuring consistent service quality across all locations may be challenging.
Cybersecurity risks associated with integrated security systems need careful management.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
Contract duration allows for stable service provision.
Focus on safeguarding the judicial process aligns with core government functions.

Sector Analysis

The federal judicial security sector involves specialized services focused on protecting government personnel and facilities. This contract, valued at $68.3M, falls within the broader engineering and security services market. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically consider the scale of operations, the level of threat, and the specific technologies deployed. The U.S. Marshals Service is a primary agency responsible for judicial security, and contracts of this nature are essential for their mission.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was awarded through full and open competition and does not specify any small business set-aside. Therefore, direct benefits to small businesses through this specific award are not apparent. However, the prime contractor, Securityhunter, Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors, depending on their subcontracting plan and the nature of the services required.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the U.S. Marshals Service, with specific contract officers and technical monitors responsible for performance and compliance. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award process itself. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract terms, including performance standards and reporting requirements. The Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General may also provide oversight.

Related Government Programs

Federal Protective Service Contracts
Department of Homeland Security Security Services
Department of State Diplomatic Security
General Services Administration (GSA) Schedule Contracts for Security

Risk Flags

Mission Critical Service
Potential for High Impact Security Breach
Reliance on Single Contractor for Essential Services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $68,300.43 to SECURITYHUNTER, INC.. MISSION CRITICAL: SAFEGUARDING THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL PROCESS, INCLUDING PROTECTING JUDGES, ATTORNEYS, AND COURT PERSONNEL. PROVIDING PHYSICAL SECURITY IN COURTHOUSES. NEW ORDER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SECURITYHUNTER, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (U.S. Marshals Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $68,300.43.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-08-27. End: 2026-08-28.

What is the track record of Securityhunter, Inc. in providing similar judicial security services to federal agencies?

Securityhunter, Inc. has a history of providing security services to government entities. While specific details on their performance with the U.S. Marshals Service or in direct judicial security roles require deeper investigation, their presence in the federal contracting space suggests experience. A thorough review would involve examining past performance evaluations, any contract disputes or awards, and their specialized certifications relevant to high-security environments. Understanding their past performance is crucial for assessing their capability to meet the critical demands of safeguarding the federal judicial process, ensuring they possess the necessary expertise, reliability, and security clearances.

How does the $68.3M contract value compare to historical spending on judicial security by the U.S. Marshals Service?

The $68.3 million contract value represents a significant investment in judicial security over its 366-day duration. To contextualize this, historical spending data from the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) for similar security services would be needed. Analyzing past annual budgets and contract awards for physical security, personnel protection, and courthouse security systems would provide a benchmark. If this contract represents a substantial increase or decrease compared to previous years, it could indicate shifts in threat assessments, policy changes, or evolving security needs. Without direct comparative data, it's difficult to definitively state if this is higher or lower than average, but its scale suggests a comprehensive security requirement.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Key risks include potential service disruptions if the contractor fails to perform, security breaches due to system failures or human error, and cost overruns if the fixed-price contract doesn't adequately account for unforeseen circumstances. Mitigation strategies likely involve rigorous contractor vetting, performance monitoring by the USMS, clear service level agreements, and contingency planning. The firm-fixed-price nature aims to control costs, but effective oversight is crucial to ensure the contractor meets all security and performance standards. Cybersecurity risks associated with integrated security systems also require proactive management and regular audits.

How effective are the current security measures provided under this contract in deterring threats to the federal judiciary?

Assessing the effectiveness of security measures is complex and often relies on threat intelligence and incident rates, which are not publicly detailed for security reasons. The contract's focus on safeguarding judges, attorneys, and courthouses suggests a proactive approach to threat deterrence. Effectiveness can be indirectly gauged by the absence of major security incidents, the successful implementation of security protocols, and positive feedback from protected personnel. Continuous evaluation by the USMS, potentially incorporating threat assessments and post-incident analyses, would inform ongoing adjustments to security strategies to maintain high levels of protection.

What is the typical duration and value range for similar engineering and security service contracts awarded by the Department of Justice?

Contracts for engineering and security services within the Department of Justice can vary significantly in duration and value, depending on the scope and criticality of the mission. Typical durations might range from one to five years, with values potentially spanning from a few million to tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars for large-scale, long-term requirements. The $68.3M value for a 366-day contract suggests a substantial, focused requirement for specialized security solutions. Benchmarking against similar contracts would involve examining awards for courthouse security, protective services, and security system integration across various DOJ components.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: ALARM, SIGNAL, SECURITY DETECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 7249 AMBASSADOR RD, WINDSOR MILL, MD, 21244

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $68,300

Exercised Options: $68,300

Current Obligation: $68,300

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15M10624AA47NS05E

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline