DOJ's $1.75M Judicial Security Contract Awarded to Securityhunter, Inc. for Physical Courthouse Protection

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $174,947 ($174.9K)

Contractor: Securityhunter, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-08-04

End Date: 2026-10-15

Contract Duration: 437 days

Daily Burn Rate: $400/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: NEW NPSP ORDER - MISSION CRITICAL: SAFEGUARDING FEDERAL JUDICIAL PROCESS, PROTECTING JUDGES, ATTORNEYS, AND COURT PERSONNEL BY PROVIDING PHYSICAL SECURITY IN COURTHOUSES.

Place of Performance

Location: WINDSOR MILL, BALTIMORE County, MARYLAND, 21244

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $174,946.94 to SECURITYHUNTER, INC. for work described as: NEW NPSP ORDER - MISSION CRITICAL: SAFEGUARDING FEDERAL JUDICIAL PROCESS, PROTECTING JUDGES, ATTORNEYS, AND COURT PERSONNEL BY PROVIDING PHYSICAL SECURITY IN COURTHOUSES. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on safeguarding federal judicial processes and personnel. 2. Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding environment. 3. Firm-fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 4. Performance period spans over a year, indicating a sustained need for these services. 5. The contract is a BPA Call, suggesting it leverages an existing agreement. 6. Securityhunter, Inc. is the sole awardee for this specific task order.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $1.75 million for physical security in courthouses appears reasonable given the critical nature of the services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for courthouse security, especially those managed by the U.S. Marshals Service, would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure is a positive indicator for cost control. Without specific details on the scope of services and locations covered, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the amount aligns with the essential protective functions required.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competitive process was intended. This approach generally leads to better price discovery and ensures the government receives offers from a wide range of qualified contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it is designed to foster a competitive environment, potentially driving down costs and ensuring the government secures services at the most advantageous prices available in the market.

Public Impact

Federal judges, attorneys, and court personnel are the primary beneficiaries, ensuring their safety and the continuity of judicial operations. The services delivered include physical security measures within federal courthouses. The geographic impact is focused on federal courthouses, likely within the jurisdiction of the U.S. Marshals Service. Workforce implications may include the deployment of security personnel and the use of security technology, potentially creating or sustaining jobs in the security sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific bidder count limits assessment of actual competition intensity.
Scope of physical security measures not detailed, making precise value assessment difficult.
Performance metrics and success criteria for the security services are not publicly available.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a commitment to market-based pricing.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Contract supports a critical government function: safeguarding the judicial process.
The U.S. Marshals Service, a specialized agency, is overseeing this contract.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically engineering services (NAICS 541330). The market for security services, particularly for government facilities, is substantial, driven by national security and public safety requirements. This award represents a small portion of overall federal spending on security and protective services, which often includes physical security, cybersecurity, and investigative services. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within the U.S. Marshals Service's historical procurement data for courthouse security.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (sb: false) and does not specify any small business subcontracting requirements. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears minimal for this specific award. However, the prime contractor, Securityhunter, Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors, though this is not detailed in the provided information. Further analysis of subcontracting plans would be needed to fully assess the impact on small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the U.S. Marshals Service, a division of the Department of Justice. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's performance work statement, requiring adherence to specific security protocols and standards. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed operational plans and performance reports are typically not public. The Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General may have jurisdiction for audits and investigations if any issues arise.

Related Government Programs

Federal Protective Service Contracts
Department of Justice Security Services
U.S. Marshals Service Protective Operations
Courthouse Security Modernization Programs
Physical Security Services for Government Facilities

Risk Flags

Potential for contractor performance issues impacting critical security functions.
Reliance on a single awardee for this specific task order.
Scope of services not fully detailed, limiting precise value and risk assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $174,946.94 to SECURITYHUNTER, INC.. NEW NPSP ORDER - MISSION CRITICAL: SAFEGUARDING FEDERAL JUDICIAL PROCESS, PROTECTING JUDGES, ATTORNEYS, AND COURT PERSONNEL BY PROVIDING PHYSICAL SECURITY IN COURTHOUSES.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SECURITYHUNTER, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (U.S. Marshals Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $174,946.94.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-08-04. End: 2026-10-15.

What is the track record of Securityhunter, Inc. in providing similar physical security services to federal agencies, particularly the U.S. Marshals Service?

Assessing Securityhunter, Inc.'s track record requires a review of their past performance on federal contracts. This would involve examining contract databases like SAM.gov for previous awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any documented history of successful service delivery. Specifically, their experience with the U.S. Marshals Service is crucial, as this agency has unique and stringent security requirements for federal courthouses. A positive track record would indicate familiarity with operational needs, compliance standards, and the ability to manage complex security operations effectively. Conversely, any history of performance issues, contract disputes, or failures to meet security standards would raise concerns about their suitability for this critical mission.

How does the awarded value of $1.75 million compare to similar courthouse security contracts managed by the U.S. Marshals Service?

To benchmark the $1.75 million award, one would need to compare it against historical contracts for physical security services at federal courthouses awarded by the U.S. Marshals Service. Key comparison points include the duration of the contract, the scope of services (e.g., personnel, technology, specific security measures), the number of facilities covered, and the geographic location. For instance, if similar contracts for comparable-sized courthouses over a similar period have ranged from $1 million to $2.5 million, then this award appears to be within a reasonable market range. However, if comparable contracts are significantly lower or higher, it would warrant further investigation into the specific requirements and market conditions that might justify the difference. The firm-fixed-price nature of this contract also suggests a degree of cost certainty.

What are the primary risk indicators associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Primary risk indicators for this contract include the potential for security breaches, contractor performance failures, cost overruns (though mitigated by fixed-price), and the critical nature of the services which means any disruption has significant consequences. The reliance on a single awardee for this task order (BPA Call) could also be a risk if the contractor underperforms. Mitigation strategies likely involve rigorous performance monitoring by the U.S. Marshals Service, clearly defined performance standards in the contract, contingency planning for security incidents, and potentially pre-qualification of the contractor's personnel and systems. The firm-fixed-price contract type helps mitigate financial risks for the government. Regular security audits and compliance checks would also be essential.

What is the expected effectiveness of the physical security measures to be provided under this contract in safeguarding federal judicial processes?

The effectiveness of the physical security measures hinges on the specific services Securityhunter, Inc. will provide, which are not detailed in the summary. Generally, effective courthouse security involves a multi-layered approach including access control, surveillance, trained security personnel, and potentially advanced screening technologies. The U.S. Marshals Service, as the contracting agency, has extensive experience in defining and overseeing these measures. Assuming the contract outlines robust protocols and the contractor meets performance expectations, the measures should significantly enhance the safety of judges, attorneys, and court personnel, thereby protecting the integrity of judicial proceedings. The 'mission critical' designation underscores the high expectation for effectiveness.

How has federal spending on courthouse security evolved over the past five years, and does this contract align with historical trends?

Analyzing federal spending on courthouse security over the past five years would involve examining aggregate data from agencies like the U.S. Marshals Service, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, and potentially the General Services Administration. Trends might reflect increasing security needs due to evolving threats, investments in new technologies, or shifts in contracting strategies (e.g., more task orders under existing agreements like BPAs). This $1.75 million award, as a single task order, needs to be viewed within the context of the overall annual budget allocated for courthouse security. If historical spending has been in the tens or hundreds of millions annually for such services, this contract aligns as one component. Significant deviations from historical spending patterns for similar scopes of work would warrant scrutiny.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: ALARM, SIGNAL, SECURITY DETECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 7249 AMBASSADOR RD, WINDSOR MILL, MD, 21244

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $174,947

Exercised Options: $174,947

Current Obligation: $174,947

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15M10624AA47NS05E

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline