DOJ's $7.67M COMSEC Support Contract Awarded to ENPROVERA CORP Amidst Limited Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $7,673,049 ($7.7M)

Contractor: Enprovera Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2022-09-30

End Date: 2026-09-29

Contract Duration: 1,460 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.3K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: COMSEC SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20530

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $7.7 million to ENPROVERA CORP for work described as: COMSEC SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the fixed-price nature and duration, but detailed benchmarking is needed. 2. Competition was limited, raising questions about potential price overruns and optimal resource allocation. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with contract duration and sole-source award being key areas for scrutiny. 4. Performance context is within the FBI's critical cybersecurity operations, demanding high reliability. 5. Sector positioning is in IT services, specifically computer-related services, a growing area of federal spending.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's total value of $7.67 million over approximately four years suggests a moderate annual spend. Without specific deliverables or comparable contract data, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government, but the lack of competition could mean the price is not as competitive as it could be. Benchmarking against similar COMSEC support contracts for agencies of the FBI's size and scope would be necessary for a more definitive evaluation.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was awarded under a 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' basis, indicating a limited competition scenario. The specific reasons for this limitation, such as a critical need or lack of qualified sources, are not detailed. With only one awardee, it's difficult to assess the full spectrum of market pricing and service offerings. The limited competition may have resulted in a higher price than if multiple vendors had vied for the contract.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition means taxpayers may not have benefited from the cost savings typically achieved through a robust bidding process. This could translate to a less efficient use of federal funds.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which receives essential COMSEC support. Services delivered include crucial cybersecurity measures to protect sensitive government information. The geographic impact is centered in Washington D.C., where the contract is managed and likely services are rendered. Workforce implications may involve specialized cybersecurity personnel employed by ENPROVERA CORP.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition may lead to higher costs for taxpayers.
Lack of detailed performance metrics makes assessing contractor effectiveness difficult.
The 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status warrants further investigation into the justification.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Long-term contract (approx. 4 years) allows for sustained support and potential efficiency gains.
Award to a single entity can foster a strong working relationship and specialized expertise.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically under 'Other Computer Related Services.' The federal IT services market is substantial, with agencies increasingly relying on specialized support for cybersecurity, data management, and network infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks for COMSEC support services can vary widely based on scope, duration, and security requirements, but this contract represents a significant investment in maintaining the FBI's operational security.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this award (ss: false, sb: false). As a sole-source or limited competition award, there were likely no subcontracting opportunities specifically set aside for small businesses. This contract does not appear to contribute to the federal small business contracting goals.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Federal Bureau of Investigation's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price structure, requiring ENPROVERA CORP to deliver services within the agreed budget. Transparency is limited due to the non-competitive award, but contract details should be publicly available through federal procurement databases. The Inspector General for the Department of Justice would have jurisdiction for audits and investigations if any irregularities were suspected.

Related Government Programs

FBI Information Technology Services
Department of Justice Cybersecurity Initiatives
COMSEC Support Contracts
Federal IT Services Procurement

Risk Flags

Limited competition procurement
Potential for non-optimal pricing
Lack of detailed performance metrics in summary data

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $7.7 million to ENPROVERA CORP. COMSEC SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENPROVERA CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Bureau of Investigation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $7.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-09-30. End: 2026-09-29.

What specific COMSEC services are being provided under this contract?

The contract is for 'COMSEC SUPPORT SERVICES,' which broadly refers to Communications Security. This typically encompasses a range of services aimed at protecting classified and sensitive information transmitted or stored electronically. Specific services could include cryptographic key management, secure communication system maintenance, vulnerability assessments, security policy development and implementation, and incident response related to communications security. Without more granular details from the contract award documentation, the precise scope of services remains general. However, given the FBI's mission, these services are critical for safeguarding national security information and operational integrity.

How does the $7.67 million contract value compare to similar COMSEC support contracts awarded by the FBI or other agencies?

Benchmarking this $7.67 million contract requires access to detailed data on comparable COMSEC support services. Factors like contract duration (1460 days, approx. 4 years), specific security clearances required, the number of personnel involved, and the exact technical services rendered significantly influence pricing. Generally, contracts of this magnitude for specialized IT security support are not uncommon for large federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies. However, the 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status suggests that direct price comparisons with competitively awarded contracts might not be entirely appropriate, as competitive bidding often drives prices down. A thorough analysis would involve identifying contracts with similar scopes of work, agency types, and contract lengths to establish a reasonable market rate.

What are the primary risks associated with a 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' award for critical COMSEC support?

The primary risk associated with a 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' award for critical COMSEC support is the potential for inflated costs due to the lack of competitive pressure. Without multiple bidders vying for the contract, the government may not secure the most cost-effective solution. Another risk is the potential for reduced innovation or service quality, as the contractor may face less incentive to exceed expectations. Furthermore, it raises questions about whether a sufficient market analysis was conducted to ensure no other qualified vendors could meet the requirement. This procurement approach necessitates strong government oversight to mitigate these risks and ensure the contractor delivers necessary services effectively and efficiently.

What is ENPROVERA CORP's track record in providing COMSEC or similar IT security services to the federal government?

Information regarding ENPROVERA CORP's specific track record in providing COMSEC or similar IT security services to the federal government is not detailed in the provided data snippet. To assess their performance history, one would need to consult federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS-NG for past contract awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any reported issues or successes. Understanding their experience with similar agencies, the scale of previous contracts, and client feedback is crucial for evaluating their capability to fulfill this critical FBI requirement effectively.

What are the implications of the contract's duration (1460 days) on cost and service continuity?

The contract duration of 1460 days, approximately four years, offers significant benefits for both service continuity and potential cost efficiencies. For the FBI, a longer contract ensures a stable and uninterrupted provision of essential COMSEC support, which is vital for maintaining ongoing security operations without frequent transitions. From a cost perspective, longer-term contracts can sometimes allow the contractor to achieve economies of scale and invest in specialized resources, potentially leading to a more favorable overall price compared to multiple shorter-term contracts. It also reduces the administrative burden and cost associated with repeatedly soliciting and awarding new contracts. However, it also locks the government into a specific vendor for an extended period, emphasizing the importance of thorough initial vetting and performance monitoring.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - SECURITY AND COMPLIANCE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 410 S WARE BLVD STE 404, TAMPA, FL, 33619

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,369,514

Exercised Options: $9,359,864

Current Obligation: $7,673,049

Actual Outlays: $6,337,935

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline