DO for $501.8K to Westwind Computer Products, Inc. for IT Services by Doj's Federal Prison System

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $501,800 ($501.8K)

Contractor: Westwind Computer Products, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-04-03

End Date: 2027-04-02

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: FY26-NMB-SUSE

Place of Performance

Location: ALBUQUERQUE, BERNALILLO County, NEW MEXICO, 87109

State: New Mexico Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $501,800 to WESTWIND COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC. for work described as: FY26-NMB-SUSE Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the firm-fixed-price contract type and duration. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 3. Risk indicators are low with a firm-fixed-price contract and a single delivery order. 4. Performance context is within IT services for the Federal Prison System. 5. Sector positioning is in IT services, specifically 'Other Computer Related Services'.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

This delivery order is for IT services with a firm-fixed-price contract, which generally provides good cost control. Benchmarking against similar contracts for 'Other Computer Related Services' would be necessary for a precise value assessment. However, the single delivery order nature suggests a specific, defined need rather than a broad, potentially over-priced requirement. The total value of $501.8K for a one-year duration is moderate.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating that while the initial solicitation was broad, specific exclusions were made before the final award. This suggests a competitive process was intended, but the exact number of bidders and the nature of the exclusions are not detailed here. The 'full and open' aspect implies multiple potential bidders were considered.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging multiple vendors to bid, driving down prices through market forces and ensuring the government receives competitive rates.

Public Impact

The Federal Prison System benefits from IT services to support its operations. Services delivered likely include computer maintenance, support, or related IT solutions. The geographic impact is focused on New Mexico, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications are primarily for the contractor's employees in New Mexico.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics for this specific delivery order.
Potential for scope creep if not managed tightly, despite fixed price.
Dependence on a single vendor for this specific IT service requirement.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract type limits cost uncertainty for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process.
Contract duration is for one year, allowing for reassessment of needs.

Sector Analysis

The IT services sector is vast and highly competitive. This contract falls under 'Other Computer Related Services' (NAICS 541519), which encompasses a broad range of IT support and consulting. Spending in this category by federal agencies is substantial, supporting everything from network maintenance to specialized software implementation. Benchmarking this contract's value would involve comparing it to similar service contracts awarded by agencies like the Department of Justice or other federal entities for comparable IT support needs.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it indicate any specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses. The contractor, WESTWIND COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC., is not identified as a small business in the provided data. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears minimal for this specific award, though the overall competition may have involved small businesses as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Justice's Federal Prison System contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is facilitated by contract databases, though detailed performance reports are not publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Department of Justice IT Services Contracts
Federal Bureau of Prisons IT Support
IT Services for Correctional Facilities
General Services Administration (GSA) IT Schedule Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition if exclusions were overly broad.
Vendor performance risk, though mitigated by fixed price.
Lack of detailed performance metrics in award data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $501,800 to WESTWIND COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC.. FY26-NMB-SUSE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WESTWIND COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $501,800.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-03. End: 2027-04-02.

What is the track record of WESTWIND COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC. with federal contracts?

WESTWIND COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC. has received federal contracts, including this delivery order from the Department of Justice's Federal Prison System. A comprehensive review would require examining historical contract awards, performance evaluations (if available), and any past performance issues or commendations across various agencies. The data provided focuses on a single, recent award, offering limited insight into the company's broader federal contracting history. Further analysis would involve searching databases like FPDS or SAM.gov for all awards to this entity, noting contract types, values, agencies served, and any associated performance feedback or disputes to build a complete picture of their reliability and experience.

How does the value of this delivery order compare to similar IT services contracts?

The value of this $501.8K delivery order for 'Other Computer Related Services' over one year is moderate within the federal IT services landscape. To benchmark effectively, comparisons should be made against contracts with similar scope, duration, and service type (e.g., IT support, maintenance, consulting) awarded by agencies like the Department of Justice or Bureau of Prisons. Factors such as geographic location (New Mexico), specific technical requirements, and the level of competition influence pricing. Without access to a detailed database of comparable contract pricing, a precise value-for-money assessment is difficult, but the firm-fixed-price structure and full and open competition suggest a reasonable market-based price was sought.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract?

The primary risks associated with this contract are relatively low due to its nature as a single delivery order with a firm-fixed-price structure. Potential risks include vendor performance issues, where WESTWIND COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC. might fail to deliver the agreed-upon IT services adequately or on time, impacting the Federal Prison System's operations. Another risk is vendor lock-in if the services are highly specialized and difficult to transition to another provider, although the one-year duration mitigates this. Scope creep, where the requirements expand beyond the initial agreement, could also pose a risk if not managed carefully, potentially leading to cost overruns or delays, though the fixed price aims to prevent this. Finally, cybersecurity risks are inherent in any IT service contract.

How effective is the competition level in ensuring good pricing for taxpayers?

The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' designation suggests a robust competitive process was intended, which generally benefits taxpayers by fostering price discovery and encouraging vendors to offer their best pricing. When multiple qualified bidders vie for a contract, the government is more likely to secure services at competitive market rates. The effectiveness hinges on the number of actual bids received and the specific reasons for excluding other sources. If the exclusions were justified and a sufficient number of strong bidders participated, the competition should have driven a favorable price. Conversely, if the exclusions significantly limited the pool of potential bidders, the price discovery might be less optimal.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar IT services by the Federal Prison System?

Historical spending patterns for IT services by the Federal Prison System (FPS) would reveal trends in contract types, service categories, vendor relationships, and overall expenditure levels. Analyzing past awards for 'Other Computer Related Services' (NAICS 541519) or broader IT support contracts would indicate whether FPS relies heavily on external vendors, the typical contract values, and the duration of these engagements. Understanding these patterns helps contextualize the current $501.8K delivery order, showing if it aligns with historical norms or represents a deviation. It also informs whether FPS has consistently sought competitive bids or utilized sole-source awards, impacting overall cost-effectiveness over time.

What are the implications of the 'Exclusion of Sources' clause on this contract's value?

The 'Exclusion of Sources' clause in a 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' award means that while the initial solicitation was broad, certain potential sources were deliberately excluded before the final award decision. The implications for taxpayer value depend heavily on the justification for these exclusions. If sources were excluded based on objective criteria related to capability, past performance, or specific technical requirements, and a sufficient number of qualified bidders remained, the competition could still yield good value. However, if exclusions were arbitrary or significantly reduced the competitive pool, it could lead to higher prices than a truly unrestricted full and open competition. The specific reasons for exclusion are critical to assessing the impact on price discovery and overall value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 15BPCC26Q00000011

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5655 JEFFERSON STREET NE SUITE B, ALBUQUERQUE, NM, 87109

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $501,800

Exercised Options: $501,800

Current Obligation: $501,800

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: NNG15SD04B

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline