DOJ's $66.7K food service contract awarded to H Schrier & Co Inc for 90 days

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $66,734 ($66.7K)

Contractor: H Schrier & CO Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 90 days

Daily Burn Rate: $741/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 31

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FY26 3RD QTR FOOD H. SCHRIER FOOD SERVICE

Place of Performance

Location: BROOKLYN, KINGS County, NEW YORK, 11234

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $66,734.3 to H SCHRIER & CO INC for work described as: FY26 3RD QTR FOOD H. SCHRIER FOOD SERVICE Key points: 1. Contract awarded via a competitive process, suggesting potential for fair pricing. 2. The contract duration is short-term, limiting long-term financial exposure. 3. Awarded as a Purchase Order, typically used for simpler, lower-value acquisitions. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 311999 indicates a broad category for miscellaneous food manufacturing. 5. The contract is firm fixed price, providing cost certainty for the government. 6. The small business set-aside flag is false, indicating no specific preference for small businesses in this procurement.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $66,734.30 for a 90-day period appears reasonable for food services, especially within a correctional facility setting. Without specific details on the quantity and type of food items, a direct comparison to similar contracts is challenging. However, the price is fixed, which offers predictability. The award amount is below the typical threshold for extensive benchmarking, suggesting it may be a routine procurement.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which implies a competitive process was utilized. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, SAP is designed to encourage competition for acquisitions below certain dollar thresholds. This method generally leads to price discovery and ensures that multiple vendors have an opportunity to bid, potentially resulting in a more favorable price for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of competitive procedures, even under SAP, is beneficial for taxpayers as it helps ensure that the government is not overpaying for goods and services.

Public Impact

Inmates within the Federal Prison System will benefit from the provision of food services. The services delivered include the supply of miscellaneous food items. The geographic impact is localized to New York, where H Schrier & Co Inc is based. This contract supports the operational needs of the Bureau of Prisons by ensuring food availability for inmates.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed specifications on food items could lead to quality variations.
Short contract duration may not incentivize long-term supplier relationship building.
Reliance on a single Purchase Order for a critical service like food provision.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty.
Competitive award process suggests potential for value for money.
Short contract term limits financial risk exposure.

Sector Analysis

The food service industry within the federal sector is a significant market, encompassing a wide range of needs from general supplies to specialized catering for various agencies and facilities. This contract falls under the broader category of food manufacturing and distribution, serving the specific requirements of the Federal Prison System. Comparable spending benchmarks for food services in correctional facilities can vary widely based on inmate population, dietary needs, and geographic location.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This means that the competition was open to all eligible offerors, regardless of size. The absence of a small business set-aside does not necessarily imply a negative impact on the small business ecosystem, as it may reflect the nature of the procurement or the availability of large business capabilities.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) within the Department of Justice. Standard procurement regulations and contract administration procedures would apply. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Federal Prison System Food Services
Bureau of Prisons Procurement
Department of Justice Supply Contracts
Miscellaneous Food Manufacturing Contracts

Risk Flags

Short contract duration may limit long-term supplier stability.
Lack of detailed performance metrics requires careful monitoring.
NAICS code is broad, potentially encompassing a wide range of products.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $66,734.3 to H SCHRIER & CO INC. FY26 3RD QTR FOOD H. SCHRIER FOOD SERVICE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is H SCHRIER & CO INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $66,734.3.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the historical spending pattern for food services by the Federal Prison System in New York?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for food services by the Federal Prison System in New York requires access to detailed procurement data over multiple fiscal years. This would involve identifying all contracts awarded for food supplies and services to correctional facilities within the state, noting the awarded amounts, contract types, and durations. A trend analysis could reveal fluctuations in spending due to changes in inmate populations, food cost inflation, or shifts in procurement strategies. For instance, a consistent increase in spending might indicate rising food prices or an expanding inmate population, while a decrease could suggest efficiency improvements or reduced needs. Without specific historical data for this NAICS code and agency in New York, it is difficult to provide a precise pattern, but such an analysis would be crucial for budget forecasting and identifying potential cost-saving opportunities.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar food service contracts in the New York region?

Benchmarking the awarded price of $66,734.30 against market rates for similar food service contracts in the New York region requires detailed information on the specific food items, quantities, delivery schedules, and service levels. Given that this is a Purchase Order for miscellaneous food manufacturing, it likely covers a range of items rather than a comprehensive meal service. To perform an accurate comparison, one would need to consult industry pricing guides, analyze recent solicitations for comparable goods in the region, or review data from other federal or state correctional facilities. Factors such as volume discounts, specialized dietary requirements (e.g., kosher, halal), and delivery logistics significantly influence pricing. Without these specifics, a precise comparison is not feasible, but the fixed-price nature of the award suggests the government sought cost certainty.

What is the track record of H Schrier & Co Inc in fulfilling federal contracts, particularly for food services?

Assessing the track record of H Schrier & Co Inc requires reviewing their past performance on federal contracts. This involves examining contract databases for previous awards, including the type of goods or services provided, contract values, performance ratings (if available), and any instances of contract disputes or terminations. For food service contracts specifically, it would be important to note their experience with government agencies, adherence to delivery schedules, product quality, and compliance with relevant regulations. A positive track record would indicate reliability and capability, while a history of issues might raise concerns about performance risk. Information on past performance is crucial for understanding the contractor's reliability and suitability for fulfilling the current requirement.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Potential risks associated with this food service contract include supply chain disruptions, quality control issues with the food items, and potential price volatility if the contract were not fixed-price. Given it's a short-term Purchase Order, the risk of long-term non-performance is limited. Mitigation strategies typically involve clear contract terms and conditions, performance monitoring by the contracting officer's representative (COR), and established procedures for addressing non-conforming goods or services. The competitive award process itself acts as a risk mitigation tool by selecting a vendor presumed to be capable. However, the lack of detailed performance metrics in the provided data makes a thorough risk assessment challenging.

How does this contract align with the Department of Justice's broader objectives for correctional facility operations?

This contract directly aligns with the Department of Justice's (DOJ) core objective of operating federal correctional facilities safely and efficiently. Ensuring a consistent supply of necessary food items is fundamental to maintaining the well-being of the inmate population and supporting the daily operations of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). By procuring these services through a competitive process, the DOJ aims to achieve value for taxpayer money while meeting the essential needs of the facilities. The specific nature of the contract (miscellaneous food manufacturing) suggests it supports the broader food service infrastructure within the prisons, potentially covering ingredients or specialized food products required for meal preparation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Food Manufacturing › All Other Miscellaneous Food Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: SUBSISTENCE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: 15BFTD26Q00000004

Offers Received: 31

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4901 GLENWOOD RD, BROOKLYN, NY, 11234

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $66,734

Exercised Options: $66,734

Current Obligation: $66,734

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline