Interior Department awards $3.18M for EACSS Improvement Project to Trofholz Technologies, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,175,882 ($3.2M)

Contractor: Trofholz Technologies, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2022-08-23

End Date: 2026-04-30

Contract Duration: 1,346 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.4K/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: EACSS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Place of Performance

Location: DENVER, JEFFERSON County, COLORADO, 80225

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $3.2 million to TROFHOLZ TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for work described as: EACSS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Key points: 1. The contract value of $3.18 million for the EACSS Improvement Project appears reasonable given the scope of security systems services. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a single award under a Small Acquisition Procedure (SAP), suggesting a streamlined process for smaller procurements. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with a fixed-price contract type generally transferring risk to the contractor. 4. Performance context is tied to the Bureau of Reclamation's need for enhanced security systems. 5. Sector positioning is within the IT and security services industry, specifically focusing on security systems installation and maintenance.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The award of $3.18 million for the EACSS Improvement Project to Trofholz Technologies, Inc. is a purchase order under a Small Acquisition Procedure. While direct comparisons to similar large-scale EACSS projects are limited due to the specific nature of the 'EACSS Improvement Project,' the contract type (Firm Fixed Price) suggests a defined scope and budget. The pricing is benchmarked against the contractor's ability to deliver the specified security systems services within the allocated funds. Without more granular data on the specific improvements and system components, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the fixed-price nature implies a degree of cost control.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was competed under a Small Acquisition Procedure (SAP), which is a streamlined process for procurements below a certain threshold, typically allowing for broader competition than sole-source awards. While the data indicates 3 offers were received, the specific details of the solicitation and the extent of outreach to potential bidders are not fully detailed. The SAP process aims to balance efficiency with fair competition, and the receipt of multiple offers suggests that the market was responsive.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of SAP for this procurement likely resulted in a more efficient process for taxpayers, potentially reducing administrative overhead compared to larger, more complex solicitations. The competition among three bidders suggests that taxpayer funds were used to secure a competitive price for the required security systems services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Interior and its Bureau of Reclamation, which will receive enhanced security systems. The services delivered include the installation, maintenance, and improvement of security systems, contributing to operational safety and asset protection. The geographic impact is centered in Colorado, where the Bureau of Reclamation's facilities or operations requiring these security upgrades are located. Workforce implications may include the need for specialized technicians and security personnel for the installation and ongoing support of the new systems.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for scope creep if 'improvement' is not clearly defined, leading to cost overruns.
  • Reliance on a single contractor for a critical security function could pose long-term risks if performance degrades.
  • The specific nature of 'EACSS' is not detailed, making it difficult to assess the full technical complexity and associated risks.

Positive Signals

  • Firm Fixed Price contract type transfers cost overrun risk to the contractor.
  • Competition, even under SAP, suggests an effort to obtain market-based pricing.
  • The award to an established entity like Trofholz Technologies, Inc. may indicate a level of confidence in their capability.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the Information Technology and Security Services sector, specifically focusing on security systems (NAICS 561621). This sector is characterized by rapid technological advancements and a constant need for updated security solutions. The market size for security systems services is substantial, driven by both government and private sector demand for physical and cybersecurity. This contract represents a specific investment by the Department of the Interior to upgrade its security infrastructure, fitting within the broader trend of federal agencies modernizing their facilities and systems.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). While Trofholz Technologies, Inc. is the prime contractor, there is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether the prime contractor engages small businesses for specialized services or supplies related to the EACSS improvement project. Without this information, it's difficult to assess the direct benefit to small businesses from this particular award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are embedded in the Firm Fixed Price contract terms, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics and ongoing oversight activities are not publicly detailed. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

  • Federal Protective Service Contracts
  • Department of Interior IT Modernization Initiatives
  • Bureau of Reclamation Infrastructure Upgrades
  • Physical Security Systems Procurement

Risk Flags

  • Potential for undefined scope in 'improvement' leading to cost overruns.
  • Reliance on a single vendor for critical security systems.
  • Lack of detailed technical specifications in summary data.

Tags

it, security-systems-services, department-of-the-interior, bureau-of-reclamation, purchase-order, competed-under-sap, firm-fixed-price, colorado, medium-value-contract, information-technology

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $3.2 million to TROFHOLZ TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. EACSS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TROFHOLZ TECHNOLOGIES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Bureau of Reclamation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-08-23. End: 2026-04-30.

What is the specific nature of the 'EACSS Improvement Project' and what are the key security systems being upgraded or installed?

The provided data abbreviates the project as 'EACSS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT' and categorizes the services under NAICS code 561621 (Security Systems Services, except Locksmiths). However, the specific functionalities of 'EACSS' and the exact security systems involved (e.g., access control, surveillance, alarm systems, intrusion detection) are not detailed in the summary data. Understanding the technical scope is crucial for a comprehensive assessment of the project's value, risks, and performance expectations. Further details would likely be found in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS), which would outline the specific requirements, deliverables, and technical specifications for the security systems being improved or implemented.

How does the $3.18 million contract value compare to similar security systems improvement projects within the federal government or specifically within the Department of the Interior?

Benchmarking the $3.18 million contract value requires comparing it to similar projects involving the upgrade or installation of comprehensive security systems. While specific project details are limited, federal spending on security systems can range widely based on scale, technology, and geographic scope. For instance, large-scale facility security overhauls can cost tens of millions, while smaller, targeted upgrades might be in the hundreds of thousands. The 'EACSS Improvement Project' being awarded as a Purchase Order under SAP suggests it might be a moderately sized project. Without knowing the exact scope (e.g., number of facilities, types of systems, duration of work), a precise comparison is difficult. However, the value appears within a plausible range for significant security system enhancements for a specific operational need or facility set within the Bureau of Reclamation.

What is Trofholz Technologies, Inc.'s track record with the Department of the Interior and similar federal security contracts?

Trofholz Technologies, Inc. has a history of performing federal contracts, including those related to security systems. Analyzing their past performance with the Department of the Interior and other agencies is key to assessing their reliability for this EACSS Improvement Project. Information on their prior contract values, performance ratings (if available), and any past issues or successes would provide valuable context. A review of federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) would reveal the extent and nature of their previous work. A strong track record with similar projects, especially those involving security systems for federal facilities, would increase confidence in their ability to successfully execute this contract. Conversely, any history of performance issues or disputes could be a risk indicator.

What are the primary performance metrics and success criteria for the EACSS Improvement Project, and how will they be measured?

The success criteria for the EACSS Improvement Project would typically be defined in the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) or Statement of Work (SOW). These metrics are crucial for ensuring the government receives the intended value and that the security systems function as required. Common performance metrics for security systems projects include system uptime, response times for alerts, successful integration of new components, adherence to security protocols, and timely completion of installation and testing phases. The contracting officer's representative (COR) or technical point of contact would be responsible for monitoring these metrics and ensuring the contractor meets the agreed-upon standards. The Firm Fixed Price nature of the contract implies that meeting these performance standards is a condition of full payment.

How has federal spending on security systems services (NAICS 561621) trended over the past five years, and where does this $3.18 million award fit within that trend?

Federal spending on security systems services (NAICS 561621) has generally seen a steady increase over the past five years, driven by evolving security threats, modernization efforts across agencies, and increased emphasis on physical security at federal facilities. While the total annual federal expenditure in this category can fluctuate based on major program initiatives and budget allocations, it represents a significant and consistent area of government procurement. The $3.18 million award for the EACSS Improvement Project is a single, moderately sized contract within this broader spending trend. It reflects a specific investment by the Department of the Interior to address its security needs, rather than a large-scale, agency-wide initiative. Its placement within the overall trend would depend on the total annual spending in this category, but it represents a typical procurement for enhancing specific security capabilities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesInvestigation and Security ServicesSecurity Systems Services (except Locksmiths)

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSIT AND TELECOM - SECURITY AND COMPLIANCE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: 140R8122Q0056

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1014 N MARKET BLVD STE 50, SACRAMENTO, CA, 95834

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,175,882

Exercised Options: $3,175,882

Current Obligation: $3,175,882

Actual Outlays: $1,346,606

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline

Start Date: 2022-08-23

Current End Date: 2026-04-30

Potential End Date: 2026-04-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-03-18

More Contracts from Trofholz Technologies, Inc.

View all Trofholz Technologies, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of the Interior Contracts

View all Department of the Interior contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending